Re: '06 Durango Distance to Empty Went from 384 to 303 Mi.
[Re: michaelphbarnett]
#125355
09/24/08 04:16 PM
09/24/08 04:16 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 15,134 Kelowna, B.C. Canada
DPelletier
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 15,134
Kelowna, B.C. Canada
|
Don't put too much stock into what that computer says; the DTE function is a novelty at best. Hand calculate your mileage and if you see a real drop of 23% THEN get concerned. Dave
1970 Super Bee 440 Six Pack
1974 'Cuda
2008 Ram 3500 Diesel
2006 Ram 3500 Diesel
2004.5 Ram 2500 Diesel
2003 Ram 3500 Diesel
2006 Durango Limited
[url] http://1970superbee.piczo.com [/url]
|
|
|
Re: '06 Durango Distance to Empty Went from 384 to 303 Mi.
[Re: DPelletier]
#125357
09/25/08 09:59 PM
09/25/08 09:59 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,174 Costa Mesa, California
michaelphbarnett
OP
top fuel
|
OP
top fuel
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,174
Costa Mesa, California
|
Quote:
Don't put too much stock into what that computer says; the DTE function is a novelty at best. Hand calculate your mileage and if you see a real drop of 23% THEN get concerned.
Dave
The problem is that I didn't hand calculate the mileage when it was new. I just remember the DTE being 384 miles when I'd fill it up and now the DTE is down to 303 miles.
|
|
|
Re: '06 Durango Distance to Empty Went from 384 to 303 Mi.
[Re: ademon]
#125362
11/07/12 10:27 PM
11/07/12 10:27 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,174 Costa Mesa, California
michaelphbarnett
OP
top fuel
|
OP
top fuel
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,174
Costa Mesa, California
|
Quote:
Did you get new tires? changing to a taller tire will knock it down
it has gotten new tires from the same manufacturer, the same model and the same size. This didn't change the DTE.
|
|
|
|
|