Re: 1st time on track little dissapointed
[Re: T-bar]
#1229129
05/07/12 11:07 PM
05/07/12 11:07 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 164 Savannah, GA
mopar400
member
|
member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 164
Savannah, GA
|
Congrat on getting to run your car! The 60ft seems a little slow. What is done to the suspension? What does the car weigh? I'm guessing you're giving up a good amount of time with the wrong torque converter (in the 60ft). Kevin
1965 Fury II
1970 Challenger 440, 509 cam, 11:1 w/ 452 iron heads, 6.99 1/8, 11.29@ 120mph 1/4
(1999 Magnolia Drag strip track champion)
1992 Jeep XJ Crawler
|
|
|
Re: 1st time on track little dissapointed
[Re: T-bar]
#1229131
05/07/12 11:13 PM
05/07/12 11:13 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,698 NE Oklahoma
Von
master
|
master
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,698
NE Oklahoma
|
Unless you have alot of glass components....too much cam for a heavy car...
Not enough gear, converter or compression for that cam...
4.10s at a minimum, 5k flash at a minimum and IMO 11.0-11.5 comp.
4.10s and a quality 8inch WILL drive fine and dandy on the street....Although IMO with 500 cubes the gear isnt the deal breaker w 28 inch tire...with 30 inch tires 4.10s-4.30s.
Your combo (when right and if the heads are decent to good) should go 10s...
72 RR, Pump gas 440, 452s, 3800 lbs, Corked, ET Radials,. 11.33@117.72.
Same car, bone stock 346s, 9.5 comp, baby solid. 12.24@110.
|
|
|
Re: 1st time on track little dissapointed
[Re: T-bar]
#1229132
05/07/12 11:14 PM
05/07/12 11:14 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,260 Las Vegas NV
moparmanjames
pro stock
|
pro stock
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,260
Las Vegas NV
|
Quote:
Thanks for the reply, i don't really want to get lower gears but i was thinking of a 28" tall tyre would that get the gearing down enough? Was also trying to get a higher stall but don't want to buy new just yet because thinking of upgrading the cam.
You might want to go with a little less duration at .050" and a tighter lobe separation, say 265* at .050" and a 106 to 108 lca advanced 4* to really provide some grunt for those gears and converter.
|
|
|
Re: 1st time on track little dissapointed
[Re: T-bar]
#1229135
05/07/12 11:31 PM
05/07/12 11:31 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,544 Syracuse,NY
CompWedgeEngines
master
|
master
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,544
Syracuse,NY
|
1) 60' is too slow ( gear and converter plus.....) 2) carb is too big 3) I dont think the cam is that big of a problem ( at this point, albeit a 496 could handle more cam, but you dont have a lot of compression, so there is a compromise going on there)
Work on 60' first, then the rest will come around. Your MPH indicates low 11's, but wont get there with that 60'
Make one change at a time. Dont overcam the heads, if they havent really been ported.
What LSA is the cam, and how is it installed?
RIP Monte Smith
Your work is a reflection of yourself, autograph it with quality.
WD for Diamond Pistons,Sidewinder cylinder heads, Wiseco, K1 rods and cranks,BAM lifters, Morel lifters, Molnar Technologies, Harland Sharp, Pro Gear, Cometic, King Engine Bearings and many others.
|
|
|
Re: 1st time on track little dissapointed
[Re: T-bar]
#1229136
05/07/12 11:34 PM
05/07/12 11:34 PM
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
What kind of distributor/ignition and curve do you have in it? I've seen guys drop loads of money on engine, trans and a gear only to put a stock advance distributor in the hole.
|
|
|
Re: 1st time on track little dissapointed
[Re: T-bar]
#1229137
05/07/12 11:39 PM
05/07/12 11:39 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972 Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY
Master
|
Master
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
|
Quote:
Hay Kevin, yes it's been two years since i got the car and had a ball racing again as it's been about twenty years between runs. The car weighs 3630 with me in, standard springs that have been reset down, with kyb gas adjustable shocks on rear and standard shocks on the front. It launched fairly even and straight.
I agree on the duration being big for you...get the front loose so it will lift and transfer the weight.. that will help your 60'(your probably spinning with a 1.72)
|
|
|
Re: 1st time on track little dissapointed
[Re: T-bar]
#1229138
05/07/12 11:39 PM
05/07/12 11:39 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 6,257 acworth / N. georgia - south e...
cheapstreetdustr
master
|
master
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 6,257
acworth / N. georgia - south e...
|
yes a gear will be easy and make a huge difference, have you gotten alot of wheel spin? on that 1.76 launch? its a heavy car but at the cubes your using...it should go faster for sure..
365" Iron J heads,,3480lbs best 1.39 60ft on SS springs.10.54,124 mph ...6.67 1/8th et.average 60fts 1.46 w/ small cam &.063 no2 pill tagged & insured [image][/image]
|
|
|
Re: 1st time on track little dissapointed
[Re: CompWedgeEngines]
#1229140
05/07/12 11:49 PM
05/07/12 11:49 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 164 Savannah, GA
mopar400
member
|
member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 164
Savannah, GA
|
Quote:
1) 60' is too slow ( gear and converter plus.....) 2) carb is too big 3) I dont think the cam is that big of a problem ( at this point, albeit a 496 could handle more cam, but you dont have a lot of compression, so there is a compromise going on there)
Work on 60' first, then the rest will come around. Your MPH indicates low 11's, but wont get there with that 60'
Make one change at a time. Dont overcam the heads, if they havent really been ported.
What LSA is the cam, and how is it installed?
I was thinking the same thoughts by comparing his times to my car. My car weighs the same and just has a mild 440 with 11:1 comp., iron 452 heads and a 509 purple shaft, 4.30 gears and 29.5 slicks. It would run 7.20's pretty consistant (best 6.99). I would think he would be making a good deal more power. His 1/8 MPH is pretty good. I think he should be doing atleast low 1.6's in the 60ft. I would do some suspension tweaking and maybe some 28" slicks to start.
1965 Fury II
1970 Challenger 440, 509 cam, 11:1 w/ 452 iron heads, 6.99 1/8, 11.29@ 120mph 1/4
(1999 Magnolia Drag strip track champion)
1992 Jeep XJ Crawler
|
|
|
Re: 1st time on track little dissapointed
[Re: T-bar]
#1229142
05/08/12 12:11 AM
05/08/12 12:11 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972 Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY
Master
|
Master
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
|
Quote:
The info of the internals of the motor are what the bloke i bought it off said it was so i can only go on this but the cam is degreed at -3.0 and with 114lc thats all i got in that regards. The ignition is an electronic msd unit with 6a box and blaster 2 coil. I did have the car on a chassis dyno before i raced it and the a/f ratio was good but it did only manage 385 rwhp at it's best.
With the specs you said, that cam is for a blower engine... you dont want a 114 LSA cam and with that duration your cylinder pressure is WAY down... the piston is up to far in the bore when the intake valve closes
|
|
|
|
|