Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

A guy would have to be on a marvelous, magical, delusion-filled trip to fantasyland to think there is a 40 lb-ft difference in peak torque between these cams.
-dulcich

---

Simply put I answered the members post, with a
non bias answer and WITHOUT criticism. 40 ft/lbs
of torque is enough you can feel. Depending on the equipment used you can make that much or more
over the stocker. So before you start your personal opinion on someone's elses project, think
how you wouldn't want someone else "clowninig" your choices. Put yourself in their shoes for a
change. Help, don't or IT MAY RETURN
THE "FAVOR" BACK AT YOU!!

---

Dude! The guy you're bumping heads with (Steve Dulcich) writes technical articles for Mopar Muscle and other major car magazines.
He's paid to do engine builds, dyno testing, and equipment/component performance test comparisons just to name a few.
It's safe to say that his past articles and advice have helped others to achieve successful projects, solve tuning/performance problems, and saved us from throwing away good money. He has more real world knowledge/experience in his little pinky than you would ever have in your lifetime.

---

Yes, Steve has a very good reputation as a
world renouned Mopar journalist. None that I
dare to question. He has helped me quite a bit
with his excellent tech articles, too!! There is
no question about that, either!! No harm done. I
simply voiced my opinion about the remark he made.
I understand he gets "the brunt" sometimes in his
replies to his articles, and as an automotive
journalist, it shouldn't matter. Criticism is part
of journalism. And as I had said before, I may not
agree with you, but I WOULD NEVER DISRESPECT YOU.
The idea of me bumping heads with Steve is what
YOU say! Read my post you quoted carefully, it
refers to the REMARKS, not Steves technical expertise! That's why I replied the way I DID!
Steve, no harm done man. Just expressing myself on
the negative comments NOT your tech buddy!