Quote:

S/ST 3040-What did you mean by your comment???



82.8 CFM @ .100" is not even in the ball park.

I've been through this before and I've never seen a 2.02"
valve flow more than 66 CFM @ .100" Being that far off at
.100" lift, only makes me question the 284+ at higher lifts.

I've seen similar flow numbers before, posted here.

Contrary to popular belief, this is a subject I know a little about.