Rockers were loose. uh oh or DOH! PICS added

Print Thread

Re: Rockers were loose. uh oh or DOH! [Re: aarcuda] #211730 02/02/09 01:53 PM 02/02/09 01:53 PM
Joined: Mar 2006 Posts: 9,847 MI, usa dvw master
dvw master Joined: Mar 2006 Posts: 9,847 MI, usa	No way it wore the intake cam lobes only,and exactly .038"-.042". My bet is that during lash the intake lobes were not positioned at the base circle of the cam when lashed. Doug

Entire Thread
Subject	Posted By	Posted
Rockers were loose. uh oh or DOH! PICS added	aarcuda	02/02/09 03:33 PM
Re: Rockers were loose. uh oh or DOH!	MR_P_BODY	02/02/09 03:40 PM
Re: Rockers were loose. uh oh or DOH!	aarcuda	02/02/09 03:47 PM
Re: Rockers were loose. uh oh or DOH!	Twostick	02/02/09 04:29 PM
Re: Rockers were loose. uh oh or DOH!	Cab_Burge	02/02/09 05:34 PM
Re: Rockers were loose. uh oh or DOH!	dvw	02/02/09 05:53 PM
Re: Rockers were loose. uh oh or DOH!	aarcuda	02/02/09 06:24 PM
Re: Rockers were loose. uh oh or DOH!	69charger440_6pa	02/02/09 09:09 PM
Re: Rockers were loose. uh oh or DOH!	RonP	02/02/09 09:20 PM
Re: Rockers were loose. uh oh or DOH!	dvw	02/02/09 09:26 PM
Re: Rockers were loose. uh oh or DOH!	aarcuda	02/03/09 01:11 AM
Re: Rockers were loose. uh oh or DOH!	Hyper Henry	02/03/09 01:32 AM
Re: Rockers were loose. uh oh or DOH!	69charger440_6pa	02/03/09 01:52 AM
Re: Rockers were loose. uh oh or DOH!	dartman366	02/03/09 02:06 AM
Re: Rockers were loose. uh oh or DOH!	aarcuda	02/03/09 02:22 AM
Re: Rockers were loose. uh oh or DOH!	JohnRR	02/03/09 02:32 PM
Re: Rockers were loose. uh oh or DOH!	aarcuda	02/03/09 03:12 PM
Re: Rockers were loose. uh oh or DOH!	MR_P_BODY	02/03/09 03:24 PM

Hop To