|
|
Re: latest ideas on head flow
[Re: Adobedude]
#1321681
10/17/12 08:23 PM
10/17/12 08:23 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 21,345
Marysville, O-H-I-O
70Cuda383
OP
Too Many Posts
|
OP
Too Many Posts
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 21,345
Marysville, O-H-I-O
|
Quote:
Tom...I don't think those are heads Aluminum Magnum heads, only a few sets of those made it out of MOPAR alive, his heads are what some guys call small port Commandos, Indy was blowing them out awhile back.
whatever they are, he's asking me what port job he should go with  my gut tells me that for what he wants, a 300CFM port job is overkill and money wasted on his stock stroke 360 in a 4,000 lb truck. but then we've got you know who saying that he can make them flow 300 cfm, maintain velocity, AND only increases the port by "around 1 cc" 
Thought I'd come over here and see what everyone here thought. maybe I'm mistaken in what I believed about port velocity for lower RPM drivability of a street motor vs all out flow numbers for high rpm race and chasing ETs
**Photobucket sucks**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
