Quote:

---

It must be, because 360-318 = 42 cubes, not 32.

---

yeah got that - argument is still valid -

Cubes has always been the "pitch" the 360 boys bring to the mound - but when the 318/392 combo gets mentioned torque per cui is suddenly "relegated to the minors".

I prefer this equation:

392 cu. in. ...1 hp per cu. in....392 hp (4" stroke)(torque Monster)

360 cu. in. ...1.08 hp per cu. in. 392 hp (3.580 Stroke)(medium Torque)

340 cu. in. ...1.152 hp per cu. in 392 hp (3.310 Stroke)(no torque)

318 cu in. ...1.23 hp per cu. in. 392 hp (3.310 Stroke)(no torque)

Which is most streetable to run and easiest to achieve ?

Batter up!