Re: Flowmaster vs. Magnaflow vs. Borla
[Re: Coronet-R/T-Rag]
#994363
05/17/11 08:02 PM
05/17/11 08:02 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,170 Central NC
gch
master
|
master
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,170
Central NC
|
Quote:
I just pulled the 50 series delta flow flowmasters off my 440 powered Coronet because they were just to loud! The Flowmaster "drone" at cruise just drove me crazy. I installed Dynomax turbos and LOVE THEM. They are much quiter and flow better as well. Get the turbos, they rock. PS. Get the 20 inchers.
This with an x-pipe for a little less drone and more growl when you hammer it.
The magnaflow or dynomax ultraflow sound great but are still a bit loud at cruise rpm for me. The Hooker aero chamber is anothe good option that doesent get a lot of ink.
|
|
|
Re: Flowmaster vs. Magnaflow vs. Borla
[Re: gch]
#994364
05/17/11 08:06 PM
05/17/11 08:06 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 212 Mid Michigan
Coronet-R/T-Rag
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 212
Mid Michigan
|
Quote:
Quote:
I just pulled the 50 series delta flow flowmasters off my 440 powered Coronet because they were just to loud! The Flowmaster "drone" at cruise just drove me crazy. I installed Dynomax turbos and LOVE THEM. They are much quiter and flow better as well. Get the turbos, they rock. PS. Get the 20 inchers.
This with an x-pipe for a little less drone and more growl when you hammer it.
I forgot the x-pipe. I've got one as well and it did make a big difference. Get one of those too.
The magnaflow or dynomax ultraflow sound great but are still a bit loud at cruise rpm for me. The Hooker aero chamber is anothe good option that doesent get a lot of ink.
|
|
|
Re: Flowmaster vs. Magnaflow vs. Borla
[Re: 67coronetman]
#994370
05/18/11 07:20 AM
05/18/11 07:20 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 21,345 Marysville, O-H-I-O
70Cuda383
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 21,345
Marysville, O-H-I-O
|
my Dakota 5.2L with intake, headers and cam had a magnaflow on it. sounded ok, but it muffled the lope of the cam quite a bit, and droned at cruise RPM.
I'm using some powersticks now, 2 welded together for 60 inches of "muffler" it's not bad at idle, but has some drone at cruise that I need to tune out. I'm going to first, get the exhaust out from under the truck because I just dumped it infront of the rear axle for now. then I'll try putting a short, straight through glass packed muffler to help absorb some of the sound.
I love the sound of the powersticks, especially at WOT as it's pulling through 6,000 rpm. I just need to tone it down a bit to make cruise tolerable!
**Photobucket sucks**
|
|
|
Re: Flowmaster vs. Magnaflow vs. Borla
[Re: Moparfanatic]
#994373
05/18/11 07:26 PM
05/18/11 07:26 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,116 Irving, TX
feets
Senior Management
|
Senior Management
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,116
Irving, TX
|
None of them!
I've never met a Flowmaster or Borla that I liked. I can't stand the sound and the drone can be excessive.
We are brothers and sisters doing time on the planet for better or worse. I'll take the better, if you don't mind. - Stu Harmon
|
|
|
Re: Flowmaster vs. Magnaflow vs. Borla
[Re: feets]
#994374
05/18/11 07:53 PM
05/18/11 07:53 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 15,134 Kelowna, B.C. Canada
DPelletier
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 15,134
Kelowna, B.C. Canada
|
FWIW, 2 1/2" mufflers tested at 15" WC; - Flowmaster 249 CFM - Magnaflow 284 CFM - Borla 373 CFM Straight 2 1/4" pipe - 365 CFM Straight 2 1/2" pipe - 521 CFM .....Dynomax Ultraflow - 512CFM.....AND it's significantly quieter than the Flowmasters. Dave
1970 Super Bee 440 Six Pack
1974 'Cuda
2008 Ram 3500 Diesel
2006 Ram 3500 Diesel
2004.5 Ram 2500 Diesel
2003 Ram 3500 Diesel
2006 Durango Limited
[url] http://1970superbee.piczo.com [/url]
|
|
|
|
|