Re: small block spead port head
[Re: FIREGUY12]
#989501
05/11/11 09:16 AM
05/11/11 09:16 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 12,039 Finally a HUSKER again
Moparnut426
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 12,039
Finally a HUSKER again
|
Sounds like they will make power, but also sound expensive to an already expensive engine combo. The canted valves and special valve train just makes an added expence. Ill stick with a mopar WEDGE head design which we all know works. Leave the Chevy valve design to the bowties. Not hating on what your doing, just not cup of tea. Kasey
|
|
|
Re: small block spead port head
[Re: Moparnut426]
#989503
05/11/11 09:50 AM
05/11/11 09:50 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,277 Canada
WO23Coronet
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,277
Canada
|
I wouldn't hate on it to much, let's not forget that this isn't a Chevy design, it's a Mopar design as far as I'm concerned, just like the original small block was (the polysphere's, 318 "A" engines, etc). Even the blocks in our beloved wedge small blocks were originaly designed for canted valve IEIEIEIE design heads (59 degree lifter angle which was kept but is a compromise for a wedge design). It suprises me that it took someone so long to do this cause if you look at it, it really is just a spin off of the original 50's design. Now I'm sure that there will be absolutely no parts interchange and it's probably a clean sheet of paper design, but the similarities, by the sounds of it, are there. Look at the latest and greatest Big Block Chevy heads. Alot of them have no parts interchange with factory stuff and are basically a clean sheet design if you compared them directly, but you don't see Chevy guys belly aching that they aren't "Chevy". I think that as Mopar guys we should be doing back flips that these will be available and can still be considered "Mopar" by design
|
|
|
Re: small block spead port head
[Re: WO23Coronet]
#989504
05/11/11 09:58 AM
05/11/11 09:58 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,506 Az
Crizila
master
|
master
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,506
Az
|
I'm reserving my "back Flips" for the time being.
Fastest 300
|
|
|
Re: small block spead port head
[Re: Moparnut426]
#989506
05/11/11 11:19 AM
05/11/11 11:19 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 32,394
Quicktree
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 32,394
|
Quote:
Sounds like they will make power, but also sound expensive to an already expensive engine combo. The canted valves and special valve train just makes an added expence.
Ill stick with a mopar WEDGE head design which we all know works. Leave the Chevy valve design to the bowties.
Not hating on what your doing, just not cup of tea.
Kasey
if you keep that logic we will be stuck in the 70s forever. these is nothing chevy about canted valves. it's a race piece for racing. if you want to go fast it costs no matter which brand.
|
|
|
Re: small block spead port head
[Re: Quicktree]
#989507
05/11/11 11:29 AM
05/11/11 11:29 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 12,039 Finally a HUSKER again
Moparnut426
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 12,039
Finally a HUSKER again
|
if you keep that logic we will be stuck in the 70s forever. these is nothing chevy about canted valves. it's a race piece for racing. if you want to go fast it costs no matter which brand.
Thats is true. everything costs money. Whats wrong with the 70s maaaan?
I wish I grew up in the 70s
Kasey
|
|
|
Re: small block spead port head
[Re: sixpackgut]
#989511
05/11/11 11:41 AM
05/11/11 11:41 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,578 sweden
1Fast340
master
|
master
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,578
sweden
|
here we go again with the crap where alot of people wants cheap. speed costs money,how fast do you want to go? dont think this deal has to be real expensive plenty of cantedvalve parts out there that wont cost an arm and a leg. if rockers are anything close to ford 385series or cleveland or chevy bigblock based it wont cost more than mopars shaftmount stuff.
|
|
|
|
|