Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Steering Angle modifications. #986913
05/05/11 08:53 PM
05/05/11 08:53 PM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 229
Augusta, GA
Lightning Offline OP
enthusiast
Lightning  Offline OP
enthusiast

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 229
Augusta, GA
I'm one of those guys that's into drifting, 'fore ya'll ask.....anyways.....

Hey guys, got a question for ya:



think this would be achieveable with our cars? (I'm meaning A-'s, B-'s and M-'s when I ask this)



that's about the most that all of the Nissan kids are getting from their cars.

they're cutting the mount for the tie rod on their spindles and moving them closer to the hub. But since our steering arms and the lower ball joint mount on the same piece of steel, the strength of the part has me worried a little bit.

Last edited by Lightning; 05/05/11 08:54 PM.
Re: Steering Angle modifications. [Re: Lightning] #986914
05/05/11 09:01 PM
05/05/11 09:01 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,456
Out West
4
408strokerdart Offline
master
408strokerdart  Offline
master
4

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,456
Out West
I think you have good reason to be worried with those angles.

Re: Steering Angle modifications. [Re: Lightning] #986915
05/05/11 10:01 PM
05/05/11 10:01 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 415
Peru
cbarracuda Offline
mopar
cbarracuda  Offline
mopar

Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 415
Peru
Move the front crossmember 1 1/2 inch forward. No need to cut the rod. You will get 10 degrees caster perfetc for drifting

Re: Steering Angle modifications. [Re: Lightning] #986916
05/05/11 10:40 PM
05/05/11 10:40 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,591
Canton, Ohio
S
Sport440 Offline
master
Sport440  Offline
master
S

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,591
Canton, Ohio
If the angle of the rack steering tierod connection point gets closer to a parallel line to the outer steering arm . It looses control of the wheel. That wheel will be able to clock back and forth up to a few inches or so at that point.

In your pic, facing the screen, thats nearly exactly whats happening, or about to happen.

It seems the drifters are messing with ackerman to assist drift. With True correct ackerman the Front end steering turns like Butter in corners and offers little resistance.

Binding up the frontend in turns with poor ackerman will assist the rear to slide around.

I say a real man Drifts with Power

A Boy drifts with Frontend binding

Re: Steering Angle modifications. [Re: Sport440] #986917
05/05/11 11:01 PM
05/05/11 11:01 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,664
IN
A
ahy Offline
master
ahy  Offline
master
A

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,664
IN
Another thing to consider is frame rails. With extreme lock as pictured, I'd think the tires would be on the rails.

Re: Steering Angle modifications. [Re: cbarracuda] #986918
05/05/11 11:22 PM
05/05/11 11:22 PM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 229
Augusta, GA
Lightning Offline OP
enthusiast
Lightning  Offline OP
enthusiast

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 229
Augusta, GA
Quote:

Move the front crossmember 1 1/2 inch forward. No need to cut the rod. You will get 10 degrees caster perfetc for drifting




well, there's a small problem with that: the rules for competitions don't allow for moving the crossmember.

I did find some control arms from a random company that are built for 10 degrees of caster though initially.


they're pretty much pushing things to the limit as far as binding of the rack is concerned. And in order to carry the angle that the crowd and the judge like to see, they have to do so. Which is why I posed my question.

as far as the M-body portion of the question is concerned though: I'm worried about hitting the torsion bars before hitting the frame rails. I figure finding a wheel with low backspacing should help a little bit.

Re: Steering Angle modifications. [Re: Lightning] #986919
05/05/11 11:50 PM
05/05/11 11:50 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY Offline
Master
MR_P_BODY  Offline
Master

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
Quote:

Quote:

Move the front crossmember 1 1/2 inch forward. No need to cut the rod. You will get 10 degrees caster perfetc for drifting




well, there's a small problem with that: the rules for competitions don't allow for moving the crossmember.

I did find some control arms from a random company that are built for 10 degrees of caster though initially.


they're pretty much pushing things to the limit as far as binding of the rack is concerned. And in order to carry the angle that the crowd and the judge like to see, they have to do so. Which is why I posed my question.

as far as the M-body portion of the question is concerned though: I'm worried about hitting the torsion bars before hitting the frame rails. I figure finding a wheel with low backspacing should help a little bit.




How many degrees of caster do most of the drifters run,
more caster makes the car to TRY and run straight
so I would think you only want a minimum caster...
you could cut the steering arms and make them shorter
to turn more BUT you have a frame rail thats going
to get close.... I lengthen mine on a drag car so
I dont over steer

Re: Steering Angle modifications. [Re: MR_P_BODY] #986920
05/05/11 11:55 PM
05/05/11 11:55 PM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 229
Augusta, GA
Lightning Offline OP
enthusiast
Lightning  Offline OP
enthusiast

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 229
Augusta, GA
most of them are running about 7-8 degrees of caster. (They try to max it out as much as possible, since they're running strut suspension in the front)

they say it helps when the car is transitioning because it speeds up the wheel when they countersteer. Apparently (if I remember right) since the amount of caster they run helps with the direction the car is going in, even when sideways.

Re: Steering Angle modifications. [Re: Lightning] #986921
05/06/11 12:08 AM
05/06/11 12:08 AM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY Offline
Master
MR_P_BODY  Offline
Master

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
Quote:

most of them are running about 7-8 degrees of caster. (They try to max it out as much as possible, since they're running strut suspension in the front)

they say it helps when the car is transitioning because it speeds up the wheel when they countersteer. Apparently (if I remember right) since the amount of caster they run helps with the direction the car is going in, even when sideways.




Are they running power steering

Re: Steering Angle modifications. [Re: Lightning] #986922
05/06/11 12:41 AM
05/06/11 12:41 AM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 415
Peru
cbarracuda Offline
mopar
cbarracuda  Offline
mopar

Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 415
Peru
If you have factory bushings in your lower control arm(not urethane), machine the strut rod 1/2 inch shorter and align the upper for more caster and I´m sure you will get close to 8 degrees

Re: Steering Angle modifications. [Re: Lightning] #986923
05/06/11 01:03 AM
05/06/11 01:03 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,591
Canton, Ohio
S
Sport440 Offline
master
Sport440  Offline
master
S

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,591
Canton, Ohio
IMO, dont bind up the front suspension with poor Akerman. Witch your original question is inferring to by the Pics.

For frontal push resistance do it with extra caster and if need be, extra steering inclination angle.

Re: Steering Angle modifications. [Re: MR_P_BODY] #986924
05/06/11 10:53 AM
05/06/11 10:53 AM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 229
Augusta, GA
Lightning Offline OP
enthusiast
Lightning  Offline OP
enthusiast

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 229
Augusta, GA
Quote:

Quote:

most of them are running about 7-8 degrees of caster. (They try to max it out as much as possible, since they're running strut suspension in the front)

they say it helps when the car is transitioning because it speeds up the wheel when they countersteer. Apparently (if I remember right) since the amount of caster they run helps with the direction the car is going in, even when sideways.




Are they running power steering





yes sir, with an PS Fluid cooler too.

Re: Steering Angle modifications. [Re: Lightning] #986925
05/06/11 11:05 AM
05/06/11 11:05 AM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY Offline
Master
MR_P_BODY  Offline
Master

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

most of them are running about 7-8 degrees of caster. (They try to max it out as much as possible, since they're running strut suspension in the front)

they say it helps when the car is transitioning because it speeds up the wheel when they countersteer. Apparently (if I remember right) since the amount of caster they run helps with the direction the car is going in, even when sideways.




Are they running power steering





yes sir, with an PS Fluid cooler too.




They can get away running lots of caster because
they are running PS... if you shorten the steering
arm the effort goes up... if you notice the imports
have a narrower frame rail to get a tighter turn
radius

Re: Steering Angle modifications. [Re: Lightning] #986926
05/06/11 11:24 AM
05/06/11 11:24 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,394
Pikes Peak Country
T
TC@HP2 Offline
master
TC@HP2  Offline
master
T

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,394
Pikes Peak Country
Quote:


they're cutting the mount for the tie rod on their spindles and moving them closer to the hub. But since our steering arms and the lower ball joint mount on the same piece of steel, the strength of the part has me worried a little bit.




You could try this same trick, if you have a taper reamer. Remove the tie rod ends from the steering arm, move the tire/rim to the location you want. mark tie rod intersection location on the steering arm, drill and taper ream, adjust tie re-install end, rinse, repeat for other side.

Now, I'm assuming this is a for a track only car so when your steering arm breaks, you only risk hurting yourself and you car by sliding in to the wall. I do not think this is a safe mod to perform on a street car not only for the compromise of structral integrity, but also for the geometric issues it is going to cause in suspension cyling and the resulting tire wear.

Re: Steering Angle modifications. [Re: TC@HP2] #986927
05/11/11 01:45 PM
05/11/11 01:45 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,394
Pikes Peak Country
T
TC@HP2 Offline
master
TC@HP2  Offline
master
T

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,394
Pikes Peak Country
Another option might be to convert to the post '73 style lower control arm and ball joint and make a fabricated steering arm in whatever length you want. This would require a different offset rim though as these arms are longer.







Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1