|
Re: Allowable crank journal taper and out-of-round specs?
[Re: MoparforLife]
#866607
11/29/10 05:38 PM
11/29/10 05:38 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439 Val-haul-ass... eventually
BradH
OP
Taking time off to work on my car
|
OP
Taking time off to work on my car
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439
Val-haul-ass... eventually
|
Quote:
0
Yes, Mr Callies, I understand that's what we'd all LIKE to see. But for those of us who may not be living in that world, how 'bout some realistic #s by which to base things? ![](/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/tonguue.gif)
|
|
|
Re: Allowable crank journal taper and out-of-round specs?
[Re: BradH]
#866608
11/29/10 05:57 PM
11/29/10 05:57 PM
|
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 511 Temperance, MI
68 HEMI GTS
mopar
|
mopar
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 511
Temperance, MI
|
its pretty common to have 0.0003 or so. how much do you have??
68 Dart GTS "HEMI" 10.30 @ 131 pump gas street car 3780# 69 Roadrunner 511 six pack 10.92 drive to track street car
|
|
|
Re: Allowable crank journal taper and out-of-round specs?
[Re: BradH]
#866610
11/29/10 06:19 PM
11/29/10 06:19 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,091 Delray beach, Florida
Performance Only
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,091
Delray beach, Florida
|
i can tell you that the industry standard is .0002 allowance for taper and less than .0001 out of round. that .0001 is really splitting hairs IMO. on the stuff we grind i typically see 0 out of round and less than .0001 taper, which is basically immeasurable with the human touch.
machine shop owner and engine builder
|
|
|
|
|
|