|
Re: A/C removal
[Re: IMGTX]
#861637
11/24/10 09:54 AM
11/24/10 09:54 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 582 PA
BTTG
OP
mopar
|
OP
mopar
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 582
PA
|
Had the system charged over the summer (3.5 pounds of R12). Was told the compressor was weak based on high to low side pressure differential, but didn't want to deal with it then. my project to replace the front bumper has now progressed to me pulling the motor gettign teh underhood area in great shape. My initial thought was to replace the compressor now ($120) since opening the system up and pulling the lines back at the expansion valve will help getting the motor out and not risk damaging any of the A/C components back there.
However, now I am unsure. When I pushed the shrader yesterday all the pressure was relived very rapidly with the valve BARELY pushed in (10-20 seconds). I barely pushed the valve as I was worried about getting oil/dye everywhere. Thought it would of taken minutes to bleed off the pressure. To me this suggests I have a leak somewhere as the system was charged less than 6 months ago. don't see an oily mess anywhere and don't have a UV light.
What are my options (the system is/was still R12)? I had emailed classic auto air a few weeks back before knowing the system may have a leak and got the impression that they would go to R134, but that would be pricey. Ss there some way in which I could keep the present system in a "preserved" state (i.e., don't recharge with freon, but seal to keep system viable)?......without an option like this it would appear that converting to R134 now (update hoses, replace compressor, drier, and expansion valve, flush system and charge.....pretty much guaranteed to run over $1,000+ though!) and swallowing a huge bill is my only option. I honestly do not see myself using the A/C, but want/need the system to remain viable as this is a nice car (69 Coronet R/T). fear would be that in a few years i will have done tons of damage to the system if i don't address things now.
Any Thoughts????
Thanks
|
|
|
Re: A/C removal
[Re: BTTG]
#861638
11/24/10 10:51 AM
11/24/10 10:51 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 53 Jensen Beach, Florida
pressureangle
member
|
member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 53
Jensen Beach, Florida
|
http://www.freeze12.com/This is good stuff and a lot less expensive than R-12. The only problem will be finding an A/C shop that still has R-12 equipment, and is willing to mix the two or purge their machine. They should all be going to Freeze-12 anyway since R-12 is expensive. The big problem with converting to R-134 is that the molecules are much smaller than R-12 and the 134 leeches through the walls of the hoses. To do a thorough conversion, you need to upgrade the hoses to R-134 compatible.
Why do I torture myself so?
|
|
|
Re: A/C removal
[Re: pressureangle]
#861640
11/24/10 12:32 PM
11/24/10 12:32 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,344 Central TX
roe
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,344
Central TX
|
how hard is it to find an a/c shop that still uses R-12. I want my daily driver to keep air and was going to stay with stock replacement parts. i figure a fully functionong/maintenanced stock system would keepe cool in Fl and Tx. Been suffering through brutal summers with no a/c since 2003.
1971 Plymouth Satellite 408/904 8 3/4 3.23 SG
|
|
|
Re: A/C removal
[Re: BTTG]
#861642
11/24/10 12:52 PM
11/24/10 12:52 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,344 Central TX
roe
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,344
Central TX
|
any substitutes that don't require all those hose/drier changes? I only ask because if i do need to make those changes then can i order compatible stuff from the parts stores like autozone like i do with stock stuff, or would i need to have someplace make me some usable hoses?
1971 Plymouth Satellite 408/904 8 3/4 3.23 SG
|
|
|
|
|
|