Re: Dampner age / effectiveness ??????
[Re: Joshs68]
#824890
10/08/10 10:26 AM
10/08/10 10:26 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,172 Ohio
theclutcher
OP
top fuel
|
OP
top fuel
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,172
Ohio
|
Stupid question but how could you tell that. Rubber ring show evidence of tearing? Sounds like I need to look at timing mark and keyway closer. Thanks all.
Last edited by theclutcher; 10/08/10 10:29 AM.
|
|
|
Re: Dampner age / effectiveness ??????
[Re: theclutcher]
#824891
10/08/10 11:06 AM
10/08/10 11:06 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,080 U.S.S.A.
JohnRR
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,080
U.S.S.A.
|
Quote:
Stupid question but how could you tell that. Rubber ring show evidence of tearing? Sounds like I need to look at timing mark and keyway closer. Thanks all.
Look at the rubber ring they dry rot just like any other rubber part with age. there is a service that can rebuild them if you desire to reuse your stock one otherwise I would get an SFI rated piece for a Race engine or something that sees alot of RPM
|
|
|
Re: Dampner age / effectiveness ??????
[Re: JohnRR]
#824893
10/08/10 02:40 PM
10/08/10 02:40 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,210 New York
polyspheric
master
|
master
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,210
New York
|
Yup. The damper’s rubber ring will naturally decay with age, mileage, exposure to hot chemicals, vibration, ozone, and ultra-violet light, and become unsuitable for even a stock engine, let alone high performance or racing use. Visible signs of damage and potential failure include: » rubber is missing » rubber is discolored gray or “chalky” » rubber has surface cracking » rubber has been partially extruded » damper rim is dented or bent » damper is loose on its hub or on the crankshaft nose » damper rim has excessive runout (“wobble”) » “squeaking” noise that defies detection If you have any doubts about the integrity of a factory damper, remove it (and rebuild it, if you wish). Even a high-mileage (but apparently undamaged) damper has lost some effectiveness due to hardening of the rubber parts, which also changes its frequency range. Even if not damaged, it’s not doing the job if it doesn’t “float” the inertia ring as it was designed to do, which is at specific RPM points (not continuously). The bad ones I’ve seen that we know slipped (the engine won’t run with the ignition timing marks aligned, but seems OK if you tune it “by ear” and check for pinging) all look damaged, but this obviously only catches them when they’re toast. If you can rotate it with a big strap wrench or a seat belt, or wiggle it front to back, it’s gone. It’s important that this be fixed, because the harmonics occur in narrow RPM ranges, and cruising in exactly that speed for an hour might throw the outer ring right off (into the belt, fan, radiator, &c.). Do not make this your last purchase. Do not “just to run it for a while like this”. It may not last a while.
Boffin Emeritus
|
|
|
Re: Dampner age / effectiveness ??????
[Re: polyspheric]
#824894
10/08/10 02:45 PM
10/08/10 02:45 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 699 Cooperstown, NY
jrlegacy23
mopar
|
mopar
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 699
Cooperstown, NY
|
put a line of paint on the dampner from the outside to the inside piece, across the rubber section. If the line shifts at all, the dampner is bad.
[color:"#00FF00"]68 Fastback Barracuda with some stuff[/color]
|
|
|
|
|