What is wrong with my alignment? HELP PLEASE?? Long!
#814075
09/25/10 05:49 PM
09/25/10 05:49 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,016 Cumberland, MD
Moparguy383
OP
super stock
|
OP
super stock
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,016
Cumberland, MD
|
First some background, '72 Charger, power steering, everything in front end new. Moog offset upper control arm bushings, new 1 inch torsion bars, etc. This is the second time I have had the car at the alignment shop, the first time the tech put everything into the specs "as close as he could get them". These are the specs I got out of the tech archives. (Camber: -.50 to 0 degrees, Caster: As much positive as you can get up to 3 degrees, Toe-in: 1/16th-1/8th inch). Car wandered all over the place. Took the car back yesterday, different tech worked on it, (he has done 2 other old mopars for me). He said there was no way he could even come close getting it set to the specs out of the archive. He said he did the best he could. I had him print out the specs, here they are. Left front caster 1.2 degrees, Right front caster 1.0 degrees. Left front camber 0.2 degrees, Right front camber -0.2 degrees. Left front toe 0.02", Right front toe -0.00". Now the car is more stable than it was before, but still not right. It turns "in" very quickly, and at speeds above 60 m.p.h. it wants to wander. Not as bad as before, but still enough to bother me. Can anyone tell me what might be the problem. The tech suggested that the machine shop might have pressed the offset upper control arm bushings in wrong. When I sent the control arms to the machine shop, I included instructions I printed off of this site or maybe another site that showed how they should be pressed in. Any help would be most appreciated. Thank you in advance. Reid. ![](/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smilie_help.gif)
|
|
|
Re: What is wrong with my alignment? HELP PLEASE?? Long!
[Re: express]
#814077
09/25/10 07:44 PM
09/25/10 07:44 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,577 Long Island, NY USA
BergmanAutoCraft
master
|
master
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,577
Long Island, NY USA
|
I don't know why this comes up so often..The second set of specs needs a little more pos caster. My guess is that the offsets that need to be installed backwards for more caster, were installed as per the directions.
Remember, these bushings were intended to compensate for sagging frames, not to increase caster, hence the directions.
The toe is also a little off, as its going to need a 1/16 total, or very close to that. You can run less toe if as you solidfy the strut rod connection to the frame, ie urethane bushing or solid bushing/heim arrangement.
Hope this helps.
|
|
|
Re: What is wrong with my alignment? HELP PLEASE?? Long!
[Re: Moparguy383]
#814078
09/25/10 07:55 PM
09/25/10 07:55 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 9,316 SoCal
68HemiB
master
|
master
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 9,316
SoCal
|
Individual cars differ, and there is a limit to how well you will ever get an old mass-produced Mopar to track, compared to the behavior of modern samples. That being said, you should pursue increasing your caster to improve things. The higher the caster (balanced side-to-side), the less the tendency to wander. Note that if you set one side significantly different than the other, the car will tend to pull towards the side with the lower reading. As the tech alluded to, the upper control arm eccentrics have a limit to their travel. As a former alignment mechanic, I suggest you look into two areas:
1. Is there anything you can compromise on in the area of ride height?
2. Were the offset bushings really installed in a manner to increase caster?
1. Ride height
Many people prefer the looks of a car that has the tail in the air and/or the nose dropped. If your car is that way (with a significant downward rake rear-to-front), be aware that every additional degree of rake is reducing your caster one degree. I am not suggesting that you raise the car's nose into the sky, but if you lowered the T-bars any, that contributed to your situation. Disclaimer: Any ride height change now will require yet another trip to the alignment rack.
2. "Problem solver" bushings.
The "problem" these bushings were originally designed to solve was too little CAMBER. Therefore, the installation sheet that is included in the box with them instructs you to install them to achieve that end. IGNORE THAT INSTRUCTION SHEET. Instead, install them so as to shift the upper ball joint rearward, as shown in the diagram below.
Down to just a blue car now.
|
|
|
Re: What is wrong with my alignment? HELP PLEASE?? Long!
[Re: dulcich]
#814080
09/25/10 09:17 PM
09/25/10 09:17 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,016 Cumberland, MD
Moparguy383
OP
super stock
|
OP
super stock
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,016
Cumberland, MD
|
68HemiB, that picture you posted was the exact thing I printed out and took to the machine shop. I guess I should have double checked their work, but I figured they were a competent shop so I never looked. Dulcich, I can adjust the toe a small amount without having to have the whole car realigned, correct? The tech said that to get more caster, it was pushing the tops of the tires out. That is why he suggested that the bushings may have been installed incorrectly. Thanks again, Reid. ![](/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/thumbs.gif)
|
|
|
Re: What is wrong with my alignment? HELP PLEASE?? Long!
[Re: can.al]
#814085
09/26/10 01:27 PM
09/26/10 01:27 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,688 Marlboro, NY, USA
Rick_Ehrenberg
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,688
Marlboro, NY, USA
|
All the above thread seems to assume that everything is "right" and the angles are just set wrong / less than optimum, etc. However...
It is possible that there are other factors at work here, such as bent rail, bent suspension part, loose UCA tubes (in K-mem), defective K (welded crooked, not that uncommon), etc.
If the alignment shop is cooperative, ask them to check steering axis inclination, bump steer (toe at rest, then full jounce, then full rebound), camber pattern, etc.
You can do a quick eyeball K-member / bent part check (doesn't check everything, but it is a start) by looking (1) at the centerlink: Gotta be level; and, (2) at the tie rods, angles gotta be identical on both sides.
I have seen MANY cars that were properly static aligned either to factory specs, or to "performance" settings (gotta have at least a skosh of neg camber in my book), and still drove scary!
Also, don't count out REAR suspension problems, broken leafs, shot front bushing, etc.
We are also assuming that the steering box is good.
Rick Ehrenberg
|
|
|
Re: What is wrong with my alignment? HELP PLEASE?? Long!
[Re: John426]
#814089
09/28/10 12:38 AM
09/28/10 12:38 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,016 Cumberland, MD
Moparguy383
OP
super stock
|
OP
super stock
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,016
Cumberland, MD
|
Thanks for all of the suggestions. I am going to check the upper control arm bushings to see if they are installed correctly. I don't know if I can get the alignment shop to check all of the things that Rick mentioned, they seem like they just want to get you in and out. I will also do a visual check for the K member/bent parts, (centerlink level, tie rod angles match etc.). The rear suspension is all new as well, springs, bushings, shocks, hangers, etc. Steering box is nice and tight. I never drove the car before, I bought it as a roller and went to work. I replaced the strut rod bushings with new energy suspension poly bushings. I cant remember if they came with new sleeves, or I reused the old ones, I will check that also. I have a bunch of double checking to do, thanks again. Reid. ![](/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/bow.gif)
|
|
|
|
|