Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Pro's and Con's of the small block 587 casting heads? #798273
09/10/10 10:21 PM
09/10/10 10:21 PM
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 382
Roseville MN
7
72swgnr Offline OP
enthusiast
72swgnr  Offline OP
enthusiast
7

Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 382
Roseville MN
What are the pros and cons of using this head in a warmed up 360 compared to other stock small block heads?

The heads will have the 2.02 intakes installed and have some porting work done to them.

Re: Pro's and Con's of the small block 587 casting heads? [Re: 72swgnr] #798274
09/10/10 10:45 PM
09/10/10 10:45 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 15,487
Florida
S
scratchnfotraction Offline
I Live Here
scratchnfotraction  Offline
I Live Here
S

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 15,487
Florida
360 heads are pretty much a 360 head

adding the porting and valves is what you make of them IMO

the #308 are the coveted ones with a better exhast port just under a magnum head

Re: Pro's and Con's of the small block 587 casting heads? [Re: 72swgnr] #798275
09/10/10 10:47 PM
09/10/10 10:47 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,419
Kalispell Mt.
H
HotRodDave Offline
I Live Here
HotRodDave  Offline
I Live Here
H

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,419
Kalispell Mt.
The only ones that are gonna make any differance in power are gonna be magnums, waaaaaaay better chambers, better ex ports and better ex ports, milled valve cover rails, 10 valve cover bolts, no water on ex manifold bolts... but beside the magnum no other 340-360 head will make significantly more power. For low end TQ the closed chamber 273 and 318 heads are better if built to take advantage of the quench but they will not make the top end power of the 340-360 heads.


I am not causing global warming, I am just trying to hold off a impending Ice Age!



Re: Pro's and Con's of the small block 587 casting heads? [Re: HotRodDave] #798276
09/10/10 10:58 PM
09/10/10 10:58 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 15,487
Florida
S
scratchnfotraction Offline
I Live Here
scratchnfotraction  Offline
I Live Here
S

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 15,487
Florida


what HRD said,mags dont have the heat cross over ports either

R/T mags are good also

you can get those EQ heads,that are mag heads with the old LA style rockers/intake bolt angle with the larger valves also, 1.92 IIRC

Re: Pro's and Con's of the small block 587 casting heads? [Re: scratchnfotraction] #798277
09/10/10 11:21 PM
09/10/10 11:21 PM
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 382
Roseville MN
7
72swgnr Offline OP
enthusiast
72swgnr  Offline OP
enthusiast
7

Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 382
Roseville MN
Thanks guys. I was told that I would have trouble with pinging at 10.5-1 compression using this head and KB 190 pistons.

Re: Pro's and Con's of the small block 587 casting heads? [Re: 72swgnr] #798278
09/11/10 12:19 AM
09/11/10 12:19 AM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,041
Lincoln Nebraska
R
RapidRobert Offline
Circle Track
RapidRobert  Offline
Circle Track
R

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,041
Lincoln Nebraska
Quote:

I was told that I would have trouble with pinging at 10.5-1 compression using this head and KB 190 pistons.


Correct. I'd (highly) recommend what's been suggested & go w a closed ch mag head/get quench. You'll get much more for your money.


live every 24 hour block of time like it's your last day on earth
Re: Pro's and Con's of the small block 587 casting heads? [Re: 72swgnr] #798279
09/11/10 11:18 AM
09/11/10 11:18 AM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,419
Kalispell Mt.
H
HotRodDave Offline
I Live Here
HotRodDave  Offline
I Live Here
H

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,419
Kalispell Mt.
Quote:

Thanks guys. I was told that I would have trouble with pinging at 10.5-1 compression using this head and KB 190 pistons.




That depends on cam and a few other things. Not a sure thing like a magnum with good quench.


I am not causing global warming, I am just trying to hold off a impending Ice Age!



Re: Pro's and Con's of the small block 587 casting heads? [Re: HotRodDave] #798280
09/11/10 11:46 AM
09/11/10 11:46 AM
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 382
Roseville MN
7
72swgnr Offline OP
enthusiast
72swgnr  Offline OP
enthusiast
7

Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 382
Roseville MN
Quote:

Quote:

Thanks guys. I was told that I would have trouble with pinging at 10.5-1 compression using this head and KB 190 pistons.




That depends on cam and a few other things. Not a sure thing like a magnum with good quench.




cam specs are:

Intake Duration at 050 inch Lift 251
Exhaust Duration at 050 inch Lift 257
Duration at 050 inch Lift 251 int./257 exh.
Advertised Intake Duration 295
Advertised Exhaust Duration 307
Advertised Duration 295 int./307 exh.
Intake Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio 0.564 in.
Exhaust Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio 0.564 in.
Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio 0.564 int./0.564 exh.
Lobe Separation (degrees) 110


Comp recomends 10.1 compression with this cam. So hopefully we can get the compression between 10.1-10.5-1 so I can run 91-92 octane pump gas.

Re: Pro's and Con's of the small block 587 casting heads? [Re: 72swgnr] #798281
09/11/10 01:01 PM
09/11/10 01:01 PM
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 6,167
Maryland
GO_Fish Offline
master
GO_Fish  Offline
master

Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 6,167
Maryland
With the stock type Magnum rockers, you will pick up additional valve lift. They are 1.6 ratio instead of the LA 1.5 ratio. Probably not a problem and will help breathing, just be sure to check piston/valve clearance and valve train clearances during your build. You'll probably need to have the top of the valve guides milled down some.


Scott B. "I'm a self-made man... I started with nothing, and I still have most of it!" 68 360 rusty B'cuda 'vert (GO Fish)13.59@ 98.72 mph 69 340 GTS stock 14.18@ 95.60 mph 01 5.9L Ram 1500 Quad Cab 4x4 01 3.5L 300M 16.23@ 86.97 mph
Re: Pro's and Con's of the small block 587 casting heads? [Re: GO_Fish] #798282
09/11/10 02:34 PM
09/11/10 02:34 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,392
nielsville, minn.
Q
quickd100 Offline
master
quickd100  Offline
master
Q

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,392
nielsville, minn.
Don't worry so much son, when I'm done with it, it won't be pinging you'll be worrying about. It will be changing your 'depends'. Dad

Re: Pro's and Con's of the small block 587 casting heads? [Re: quickd100] #798283
09/12/10 11:56 AM
09/12/10 11:56 AM
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 382
Roseville MN
7
72swgnr Offline OP
enthusiast
72swgnr  Offline OP
enthusiast
7

Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 382
Roseville MN
You haven't been able to scare me with the Hemi yet...does that mean mines going to be quicker?

Re: Pro's and Con's of the small block 587 casting heads? [Re: 72swgnr] #798284
09/12/10 10:51 PM
09/12/10 10:51 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,392
nielsville, minn.
Q
quickd100 Offline
master
quickd100  Offline
master
Q

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,392
nielsville, minn.
Quote:

You haven't been able to scare me with the Hemi yet...does that mean mines going to be quicker?




I'm glad you weren't with me when I got air under the front end.
Don't worry it'll be plenty fast. Dad

Re: Pro's and Con's of the small block 587 casting heads? [Re: quickd100] #798285
09/12/10 10:58 PM
09/12/10 10:58 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,200
Upper Midwest
M
MoparforLife Offline
Too Many Posts
MoparforLife  Offline
Too Many Posts
M

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,200
Upper Midwest
Those are the heads my 360 has on it. Runs pretty good with them, (Ask Dave about it.) Got them from Hughes. They won't go any farther than stage 1 on a 915 head because of marginal material to work with.


Clean it, if it's Dirty. Oil it, if it Squeaks. But: Don't fix it, if it Works!
Re: Pro's and Con's of the small block 587 casting heads? [Re: MoparforLife] #798286
09/12/10 11:03 PM
09/12/10 11:03 PM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,906
IL, Aurora
A
ademon Offline
master
ademon  Offline
master
A

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,906
IL, Aurora
i think the stage 3 on the later head is about the same as a stage one on a x/j head, Flo wise

Re: Pro's and Con's of the small block 587 casting heads? [Re: ademon] #798287
09/13/10 05:03 AM
09/13/10 05:03 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,200
Upper Midwest
M
MoparforLife Offline
Too Many Posts
MoparforLife  Offline
Too Many Posts
M

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,200
Upper Midwest
All 340/360 heads are very close to the same other than the casting numbers, other than the early 915 & 894 2.02 heads, even emission heads.







Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1