|
|
Re: 361 and 383 vs 413 intakes
[Re: RacerGofKGB]
#785651
08/27/10 04:32 PM
08/27/10 04:32 PM
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
RB: raised deck, 413, 426, 440
B: low deck, 350, 361, 383, 400
B and RB intakes are not interchangeable because the distances between the head ports are different due to the difference in deck height. RB intake is noticeably wider than a B intake.
|
|
|
Re: 361 and 383 vs 413 intakes
#785652
08/27/10 04:45 PM
08/27/10 04:45 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,200
Upper Midwest
MoparforLife
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,200
Upper Midwest
|
Quote:
RB: raised deck, 413, 426, 440
B: low deck, 350, 361, 383, 400
B and RB intakes are not interchangeable because the distances between the head ports are different due to the difference in deck height. RB intake is noticeably wider than a B intake.
Forgot the 383 RB 1959 & 60 Chrysler
|
|
|
Re: 361 and 383 vs 413 intakes
[Re: MoparforLife]
#785653
08/27/10 09:39 PM
08/27/10 09:39 PM
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Quote:
Quote:
RB: raised deck, 413, 426, 440
B: low deck, 350, 361, 383, 400
B and RB intakes are not interchangeable because the distances between the head ports are different due to the difference in deck height. RB intake is noticeably wider than a B intake.
Forgot the 383 RB 1959 & 60 Chrysler
That's because I'm an old poopyhead. . . .
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
