matching chambers to cylinders& bore notching
#783971
08/25/10 03:18 PM
08/25/10 03:18 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 190 Communist New York State, Comi...
We The People
OP
member
|
OP
member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 190
Communist New York State, Comi...
|
anyone ever document the HP gain from this process? I started it today since my rotating assembly is out. I scribed the cylinder on the heads and chamber on the block through the bottom of the bore. It seems that there should be a notable flow increase, the S/Rs werent very well matched to the bore. I was wondering why the 1009 gasket wasnt round, then I saw something online last night, and unshrouding the valve with a notch has got to be the reason. my combo wont be the same when it goes back together, so I wont be able to tell if it did anything for me. but I got till next spring so i'm going to do it.
|
|
|
Re: matching chambers to cylinders& bore notching
[Re: We The People]
#783973
08/25/10 07:45 PM
08/25/10 07:45 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,210 New York
polyspheric
master
|
master
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,210
New York
|
Yes, it's worth something. How much? Too many variables. I do it.
Boffin Emeritus
|
|
|
Re: matching chambers to cylinders& bore notching
[Re: We The People]
#783975
08/25/10 11:08 PM
08/25/10 11:08 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,591 Canton, Ohio
Sport440
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,591
Canton, Ohio
|
Yes its worth it. Lots of us here at moparts do it. Hughes Engines has been doing it for years, i think they got it from me Not that means a whole lot. I only match at the most closest shrouded points then go with a blend. Dont want to needlessly take out any desired compression. IMO it is really worth the effort. Those that flow heads really see a CFM head flow change by adjusting the head over a bore. Matching the "chambers to the cylinders with bore notching around the valves" will have the same positive effects. mike
Last edited by Sport440; 08/26/10 12:10 AM.
|
|
|
Re: matching chambers to cylinders& bore notching
[Re: We The People]
#783982
08/26/10 11:12 AM
08/26/10 11:12 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 77 British Columbia Canada
Challenger340
member
|
member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 77
British Columbia Canada
|
We were doing back in the 80's, mostly with the older iron 915 heads when using big valves and unshrouding the chambers, which picked up Flow, but, we never dyno'd any gains, just assumed once we'd cut the Chambers back, that matching the tops of the Cylinders must help rather than banging into the top of the Cylinder ? All of the Gaskets were notched there anyways to be compatible with the Maxi chambers, so we thought it couldn't hurt.
Better to be a "has been" than a "never was".
|
|
|
Re: matching chambers to cylinders& bore notching
[Re: We The People]
#783984
08/27/10 12:36 PM
08/27/10 12:36 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,210 New York
polyspheric
master
|
master
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,210
New York
|
Quick rule of thumb (only applies to some engines, YMMV): if the intake seat is closer to the edge of the chamber wall than the lift, moving the wall back may help. If it's already more than that, leave it alone. Generally the new shape is an arc centered on the valve head and concentric, but larger. If you're sure that the port swirls, offset the wall relief in the same direction by 1/16" or more. If not, offset it in the direction of the stem axis at: angle × .005" (15° angle = .075",etc.) The exhausts are far less critical, 60% lift is enough. What has not been explored enough: if the chamber wall is already at the bore edge, when is moving the guide over (closer to the bore center) helpful, and how much? I've read of detectable results from even .030" re-location, but that was on a 4" bore engine with a 2.02" valve touching the bore edge. A bore edge relief is pretty harmless as to compression loss, it's way under 1 cc.
Boffin Emeritus
|
|
|
|
|