Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
building a stroker?? #65394
05/28/08 09:26 PM
05/28/08 09:26 PM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 25
WI
J
jcl005 Offline OP
member
jcl005  Offline OP
member
J

Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 25
WI
My question, Is there a problem using a 4.15 crank and 6.385 rod in a 400 block?

Re: building a stroker?? [Re: jcl005] #65395
05/28/08 10:07 PM
05/28/08 10:07 PM
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,072
Farmland, IN
Ludington1 Offline
master
Ludington1  Offline
master

Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,072
Farmland, IN
Regardless of if you buy the parts there or not, the 440Source web page has lots of good information regarding the different combinations for B/RB blocks . http://www.440source.com

Darren

Re: building a stroker?? [Re: Ludington1] #65396
05/28/08 10:23 PM
05/28/08 10:23 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,664
IN
A
ahy Offline
master
ahy  Offline
master
A

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,664
IN
I believe its been done sucessfully. You'll wind up with a short rod/long stroke engine and a "decent" compression height piston. A good aftermarket rod would be needed to hold up reliably. Piston side load will be on the high side. Other possile combinations are:

4.15 stroke/6.76 Chrysler rod: longer rod, short piston, higher rod ratio

3.9 stroke/6.7 BBC rod: longer rod, "decent" compression height piston. Proven durability in street & street/strip application.

4.25 stroke/6.535 BBC rod: max practical displacement with stock low deck block (my opinion), decent compression height, short rod ratio.

All these combos have trade-off's. Depending on where you're trying to get to with this engine, I'd choose one of the 3 above over the long stroke/short rod combo. My

Re: building a stroker?? [Re: jcl005] #65397
05/29/08 08:47 AM
05/29/08 08:47 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,004
U.S.S.A.
JohnRR Offline
I Win
JohnRR  Offline
I Win

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,004
U.S.S.A.
Quote:

My question, Is there a problem using a 4.15 crank and 6.385 rod in a 400 block?




is there a problem , sort of .

edited for stupidity

Last edited by Johnrr; 05/29/08 09:39 AM.
Re: building a stroker?? [Re: JohnRR] #65398
05/29/08 09:25 AM
05/29/08 09:25 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,376
D
dogdays Offline
I Live Here
dogdays  Offline
I Live Here
D

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,376
6.385 is bigblock chevy plus 0.250"

6.358 is B block stock length

6.385 / 4.15 = 1.53 R/S ratio, almost identical to a stock chevy 454.
You may have problems with counterweights running into the crank, I have not studied this combo. The 6.535 rod is the more usual choice.

R.

Re: building a stroker?? [Re: dogdays] #65399
05/29/08 09:39 AM
05/29/08 09:39 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,004
U.S.S.A.
JohnRR Offline
I Win
JohnRR  Offline
I Win

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,004
U.S.S.A.
Quote:

6.385 is bigblock chevy plus 0.250"

6.358 is B block stock length

6.385 / 4.15 = 1.53 R/S ratio, almost identical to a stock chevy 454.
You may have problems with counterweights running into the crank, I have not studied this combo. The 6.535 rod is the more usual choice.

R.




damm dyslexia

but still , wit hthat rod now he is having a CUSTOM piston made ? i don't think there is an off the shelf piston for that rod ??? or is there ????

Re: building a stroker?? [Re: jcl005] #65400
05/29/08 10:59 AM
05/29/08 10:59 AM
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,949
land of 10,000______'s
B
BDS871Cuda Offline
top fuel
BDS871Cuda  Offline
top fuel
B

Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,949
land of 10,000______'s
My 73 has the 400 in it.
I was going to stroke it around 500 ci.
Looks like the 440 source is the way to go.
Now with the price of gas always going up,
looks like the truck might have to go up
forsale someday soon.

4459453-S6300569.JPG (52 downloads)

Snap your neck, mega G-force launch, is all I want!






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1