Re: Looking to build 850 hp big block?
[Re: AndyF]
#635223
03/09/10 10:29 PM
03/09/10 10:29 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 903 Saskatchewan, Canada
cudabin
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 903
Saskatchewan, Canada
|
850HP from those pieces is easy... Go with the bigger bore. Why not 4.5" ? I would also consider a 4.25" crank for 540 cubes to use up all of the 440-1's potential. You could use the 4.15 stroke and wind it up higher if you have the right valvetrain, but a lower rpm motor usually lasts longer. On the heads, Modern cyclinder head has a 345cc CNC port job that flows 382" at .800" lift. Solid roller cam with around .750" lift and 284/288 duration at .050" should be enough. Could go alittle smaller on the cam if need be. that should get the job done at 13.5 to 1 compression. Andy's advice is good. Read a good book to understand the relationship between all the parts. My 540 goes on the dyno this week, and should do 875HP or so with similar build, just a little more compression. Cheers, Arnie
67 Cuda 8.48@ 158.7 mph 1.18 60' 2,600 DA(so far...)
70 Super Bee 440 Six Pack 4-speed. 13.2 @ 104 Stock exhaust/Street tires.
|
|
|
Re: Looking to build 850 hp big block?
[Re: cudabin]
#635225
03/09/10 11:01 PM
03/09/10 11:01 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,875 communist bloc of new jersey
jamesc
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,875
communist bloc of new jersey
|
Quote:
Go with the bigger bore. Why not 4.5" ?
imho you're using up the block pretty quick going right to 4.5 but to each their own. i went 4.44 and this is with a KB that you can replace the sleeves in.
|
|
|
Re: Looking to build 850 hp big block?
[Re: jamesc]
#635226
03/09/10 11:10 PM
03/09/10 11:10 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 903 Saskatchewan, Canada
cudabin
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 903
Saskatchewan, Canada
|
I guess that depends how many passes you get to make in a year, or if it sees a lot of street miles?? What is max safe bore on a typical Mega block? For me it depends on whether Max power or max life is the priority... Cheers, Arnie
67 Cuda 8.48@ 158.7 mph 1.18 60' 2,600 DA(so far...)
70 Super Bee 440 Six Pack 4-speed. 13.2 @ 104 Stock exhaust/Street tires.
|
|
|
Re: Looking to build 850 hp big block?
[Re: Bigcube]
#635229
03/09/10 11:23 PM
03/09/10 11:23 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 644 Minnesota
Barnstorm
mopar
|
mopar
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 644
Minnesota
|
My 2002 build 4.39x4.15 503?! 440-1 1150 dom made 820hp 718tq. Thx Lynn Bakek...still leaks 5 and 5.
The little old lady from Pasadena is back!
|
|
|
Re: Looking to build 850 hp big block?
[Re: jamesc]
#635230
03/09/10 11:43 PM
03/09/10 11:43 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972 Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY
Master
|
Master
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
|
Quote:
Quote:
Go with the bigger bore. Why not 4.5" ?
imho you're using up the block pretty quick going right to 4.5 but to each their own. i went 4.44 and this is with a KB that you can replace the sleeves in.
Thats the bore I went with 4.440 bore and a 4.15 stroke to give me 514CI, this is on a mega block
|
|
|
Re: Looking to build 850 hp big block?
[Re: Barnstorm]
#635231
03/09/10 11:44 PM
03/09/10 11:44 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 903 Saskatchewan, Canada
cudabin
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 903
Saskatchewan, Canada
|
Hey Big cube, don't you think another 20cfm head flow would make 850 a little easier?? JameSC, I hear you on the damage aspect... Mine is a sleeved block, so i didn't worry about that, but you raise a good point on the megablock. If you use a vacum pump and low tension rings, wear should be minimal, and i would rather buy custom pistons and only bore what is needed to get round again instead of taking .030" jumps during rebuilds. Having said that you are right that he does not need to go all the way to 4.5 to start. Cheers, Arnie
67 Cuda 8.48@ 158.7 mph 1.18 60' 2,600 DA(so far...)
70 Super Bee 440 Six Pack 4-speed. 13.2 @ 104 Stock exhaust/Street tires.
|
|
|
Re: Looking to build 850 hp big block?
[Re: cudabin]
#635232
03/10/10 07:19 AM
03/10/10 07:19 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,384 Upstate NY
Bigcube
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,384
Upstate NY
|
Quote:
Hey Big cube, don't you think another 20cfm head flow would make 850 a little easier??
Arnie, Sure, that is why I said with B1's its easy. It does not take much to get B1 originals in the 390 range. My heads hang with the best of -1's to about 500 lift. I've seen some -1 CNC numbers in 380 range but it's at .800 or .900 lift. I would like to see the numbers from the same bench mine were flowed on. It's all numbers when you talk HP and head flow, the proof is when the car runs what it should for the HP the dyno said it has
|
|
|
Re: Looking to build 850 hp big block?
[Re: cudabin]
#635233
03/10/10 08:04 AM
03/10/10 08:04 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,229 In The Hills
jughed
pro stock
|
pro stock
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,229
In The Hills
|
Quote:
850HP from those pieces is easy...
Go with the bigger bore. Why not 4.5" ?
I would also consider a 4.25" crank for 540 cubes to use up all of the 440-1's potential. You could use the 4.15 stroke and wind it up higher if you have the right valvetrain, but a lower rpm motor usually lasts longer.
On the heads, Modern cyclinder head has a 345cc CNC port job that flows 382" at .800" lift.
Solid roller cam with around .750" lift and 284/288 duration at .050" should be enough. Could go alittle smaller on the cam if need be.
that should get the job done at 13.5 to 1 compression.
Andy's advice is good. Read a good book to understand the relationship between all the parts.
My 540 goes on the dyno this week, and should do 875HP or so with similar build, just a little more compression.
Cheers,
Arnie
good combo. mine is slightly different. Mega Block, 4.5 stroke 4.375 bore. i would like to have the bore/stroke numbers reversed, but the deal on the shortblock was to good to pass up. 13.5 comp. 440-1s (currently at Muscle Motors for a 345 CNCing). Cam is a Comp roller 284/288, 728/728 (1.6s), 108. roughly 800 hp before (with minor porting), ought to be close to 850 when it goes back together
|
|
|
Re: Looking to build 850 hp big block?
[Re: Bigcube]
#635234
03/10/10 08:38 AM
03/10/10 08:38 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,095 Shelby Twp. Mi
HardcoreB
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,095
Shelby Twp. Mi
|
Quote:
My heads hang with the best of -1's to about 500 lift. I've seen some -1 CNC numbers in 380 range but it's at .800 or .900 lift. I would like to see the numbers from the same bench mine were flowed on.
Could you post your flow chart? Quote:
It's all numbers when you talk HP and head flow, the proof is when the car runs what it should for the HP the dyno said it has
I agree. I don't for one second question your HP. IIRC you were dynoed by Dwayne and he's posted HP and ET correlation for many combos in the past...I also agree that on a 540"+ short block it would easier to make that power with some B1's originals ad have some room to grow. By the time you upgrade the rockers and all with a -1 the cost difference would be negligable IMO.
|
|
|
Re: Looking to build 850 hp big block?
[Re: HardcoreB]
#635235
03/10/10 08:51 AM
03/10/10 08:51 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,384 Upstate NY
Bigcube
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,384
Upstate NY
|
Quote:
Could you post your flow chart? I agree. I don't for one second question your HP. IIRC you were dynoed by Dwayne and he's posted HP and ET correlation for many combos in the past...I also agree that on a 540"+ short block it would easier to make that power with some B1's originals ad have some room to grow. By the time you upgrade the rockers and all with a -1 the cost difference would be negligable IMO.
Some people think Dwaynes flow bench is stingy as well as his dyno. I think it's very realistic.
Here's the flow numbers from Dwaynes bench and Modern Cylinder Heads bench. MCH's exhaust numbers were with an exhaust tube. Just goes to show how much difference things can be when done slightly different
|
|
|
Re: Looking to build 850 hp big block?
[Re: Bigcube]
#635236
03/10/10 09:48 AM
03/10/10 09:48 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,384 Upstate NY
Bigcube
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,384
Upstate NY
|
When I first put the motor together I had it dyno'ed at Ritters. I had a dyno sheet that said 830 hp. The car ran a best of 9.16@147 carrying 2900#. The wallace calculators showed 745 hp by the ET and 757 hp by the MPH. I took it up to Dwaynes with no changes and his dyno showed 775 hp. I made a few changes to the motor and also added about 100#. I dyno'ed again at Dwaynes and got the 850 hp sheet posted above. That was a cold water, big number pull. At 150 deg it was more like 830 hp. The car ran a best of 8.94@151 with 3000#. The wallace calculators showed 830 hp by ET and 849 hp by MPH. I know I'm giving up some ET with my 60'. Quote:
IIRC you were dynoed by Dwayne and he's posted HP and ET correlation for many combos in the past
Numbers are all relative, the numbers that count are on the timeslip
|
|
|
Re: Looking to build 850 hp big block?
[Re: Bigcube]
#635237
03/10/10 10:57 AM
03/10/10 10:57 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,128 Salt Lake City
camastomcat
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,128
Salt Lake City
|
That's pretty stout for -1 Indy heads. I'm not buying the flow numbers though. I hear so many on this site talk about huge flow numbers from these heads 415 from cab? My B1's flow about that much and that motor makes 1030HP on the dyno. I'm still testing a dialing it in, but it has run a best of 7.43@180.69 and it's 1850lbs. I think I'll be able to get it in the 7.30's but it doesn't confirm the dyno numbers, however, that was at 3650 corrected alt. Numbers are just that, numbers. ET and MPH counts.
|
|
|
Re: Looking to build 850 hp big block?
[Re: onyxba]
#635239
03/10/10 11:12 AM
03/10/10 11:12 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,016 Frostbitefalls MN (Rocky&Bullw...
gregsdart
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,016
Frostbitefalls MN (Rocky&Bullw...
|
My 528 build pushed the 3000 lb dart to 8.78, which I believe is about where you want to be. I have a vacuum pump, but would go with a 4 vane instead of the 3 vane I have. I have 1.55 jesel rockers, but a better choice is 1.7 or higher. Shoot for an installed height that will allow high lifts,(+.800) figure that out first. The cam I had in the motor when it ran 8.78 was an Isky RR735, 280/288/110 with a gross intake lift of .765 intake with the 1.55 jesel rockers. I had it in at 110. Guys are going faster with the more lift they put in the motor, so build it to a level you feel will live. Valve springs ,lifters and pushrods have all come a long way, and parts will live longer at high lifts than in the past. You will need to do a lot of home work to come up with a good combo. Terry Manton and his dad, who is a spring engineer, opened my eyes to a lot of information, as well as what I had been doing wrong in the past. Run the lightest rings you can to reduce friction. I have .043 / .043 and 3/16 low tension rings, takes 22 ft lbs to turn over the shortblock on the stand. I run alky injection on a 3x intake, 15/1 compression with 64 cc 440-1 heads. The biggest bore up to 4.5 that you are willing to run will perform the best. I run a 4.15 stroke, 4.5 bore. 2 1/8 headers, designed to go over the chassis tubes for better flow out of the ports, allowing the 2 1/8 tube to work best. Get some lift built into it, as a gross lift of .800 will really only be about .750 after lash and flex. Good pushrods are important, and the bigger you can put in, the better. I now have Manton 1/2 inchers, waiting to see how well they perform compared to the heavy wall 3/8 I had. I beleive a 4.25 with a 2.2 rod bearing, 4.5 bore motor would perform better than mine, based on a little lighter assembly and a few more cubes, pulling the torque a tad lower. This combo will have a torque peak in the neighborhood of 5,000 rpm. I do run a very loose converter, 6400 stall, and it proved to be faster than the 5600 setup . Mine likes shifts at 7100 to 7200 rpm. A good sidebucket pan and crank scraper will help you avoid the problems I had with the dragster style pan I started with. I will never run a high hp deal again without going with the best design pan I can find. Too much trouble with windage. Finally, I had my heads changed to 2.3 intakes, Vs the 2.25 valves in it when it ran 8.78. The flow picked up about 5 percent on the intake, and having to reduce the exhaust to 1.78 didn't hurt at all. Time will tell if this was worth it. But I think If I had it to do over, that is where I would start.
Last edited by gregsdart; 03/10/10 11:29 AM.
8..603 156 mph best, 2905 lbs 549, indy 572-13, alky
|
|
|
Re: Looking to build 850 hp big block?
[Re: gregsdart]
#635240
03/10/10 03:18 PM
03/10/10 03:18 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,016 Frostbitefalls MN (Rocky&Bullw...
gregsdart
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,016
Frostbitefalls MN (Rocky&Bullw...
|
I fretted over what bore to use till my machinist talked to me about all the rerings I could get at 4.500, then as the block wore there are options like .002 bigger pistons, same rings as the first, as they are.005 over. You can do this multiple times, making it a no brainer for me, as I doubt with my low number of runs I will ever get past the first set of pistons, let alone the third set.
8..603 156 mph best, 2905 lbs 549, indy 572-13, alky
|
|
|
|
|