Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 4 1 2 3 4
Re: Synthetic vs. conventional oil? [Re: dOc !] #605528
02/11/10 07:47 PM
02/11/10 07:47 PM
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 10
Texas
C
chuck2112 Offline OP
member
chuck2112  Offline OP
member
C

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 10
Texas
This is amazing! There is money to be made by the right inventor that can come up with a reasonably priced system that will purify and renew oil in a vehicle. If we can remove contaminates and parisites from lakes and streams to make drinking water....

Re: Synthetic vs. conventional oil? [Re: chuck2112] #605529
02/11/10 07:51 PM
02/11/10 07:51 PM
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 30,474
Florida STAYcation
dOc ! Offline
The village idiot's idiot
dOc !  Offline
The village idiot's idiot

Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 30,474
Florida STAYcation
BUT .. if some inventor came up with this process ... how long do you think it would be until the oil producers would buy-him-out and destroy that invention?

Re: Synthetic vs. conventional oil? [Re: dOc !] #605530
02/11/10 09:24 PM
02/11/10 09:24 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,200
Upper Midwest
M
MoparforLife Offline
Too Many Posts
MoparforLife  Offline
Too Many Posts
M

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,200
Upper Midwest
Yeah and these new and improved oils can't even handle the punishment of a flat tappet cam like the older 'poor' quality oils could handle. Really an improvement

Re: Synthetic vs. conventional oil? [Re: CompSyn] #605531
02/11/10 09:26 PM
02/11/10 09:26 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,034
NW Indiana
deansrr Offline
top fuel
deansrr  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,034
NW Indiana
Quote:

Quote:

Chuck welcome aboard and there are no dumb Q's. Fire away . The problem is that filters (even the best) only catch some of the particles plus there's the problem of the soluble contaminates like acids/sludge/carbon etc. And even if the solubles were dealt with in some fashion you still wouldn't be able to go too small on the filter material micron size as you'd reach a point where the flow is restricted. It's comparable to when you were kids and your mom would clean several of you and your siblings in the tub one right after another & after so many kids in there you just reach a (saturation) point where the only thing left to do is change the water




In 1988, the Society of Automotive Engineers conducted a study on the correlation between contaminants and engine wear. They found that contaminants in the 2 to 25 micron sizes directly correlates to engine wear. They also found that paper cellulose oil filters were ineffective at this while oil filters that used glass media where highly effective. Further, glass media oil filters have been proven to flow better and last much longer than paper media oil filters, something industrial and commercial markets have known for 20-years. Now we are starting to see the glass oil filters for automotive applications.

As far as motor oil goes, the first motor oils were non-detergent so they needed to be changed more often. This is where the 3000-mile oil change recommendation came from which goes back to as early as the 1930s. Today, we have motor oils with detergents in them. Detergents help control acids, sludge and keep contaminates suspended in the oil so the oil filter can filter them out. Based on the quality and quantity of these detergents, a motor oil can be designed or formulated for increased service life. One such detergent that is measured is called Total Base Number (TBN), which is commonly found in manufacture Product Data Sheets (PDS).

Total Base Number (TBN) is the measurement of a lubricant’s reserve alkalinity, which aids in the control of acids formed during the combustion process. The higher a motor oil’s TBN, the more effective it is in suspending wear causing contaminants and reducing the corrosive effects of acids over an extended period of time. A high TBN motor oil allows it to effectively combat wear causing contaminants and acids, providing superior protection and performance over extended drain intervals.

This is why vehicle fleet managers look at the remaining TBN content of motor oil. They do Used Oil Analysis to determine if a motor oil is still fit for service. A TBN value of 1 would be considered low and the oil would have to be drained and replaced. This is why a motor oil with a higher starting TBN value can effectively have a longer service life.

For example, look at some of the starting TBN values of these top brand motor oils:



This is why some oils are marketed as extended life oils and some are not. It's all in what you want and what you're willing to pay.

So again, if we keep the oil clean through efficient oil filtration and we use a motor oil that is formulated for longer service life, then extended oil changes are completely safe and doable as long as the engine is mechanically sound.




"IF" thats key word, I do agree with your stats, but the problem is everyday consumers aren't big on doing the IF's.


1973 Road Runner 1974 Satellite (for sale) 1973 240z (wifes) 1993 Ramcharger (thanks Devil) 2002 Honda S2000
Re: Synthetic vs. conventional oil? [Re: deansrr] #605532
02/11/10 09:29 PM
02/11/10 09:29 PM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 21,844
Kirkland, Washington
Pacnorthcuda Offline
Too Many Posts
Pacnorthcuda  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 21,844
Kirkland, Washington
Does Amsoil still purport the advantages of the "bypass" oil filters? You know, the ones that only about 10% of the oil was actually filtered on each pass, the thinking being that eventually all offending particles would be trapped????

Re: Synthetic vs. conventional oil? [Re: Pacnorthcuda] #605533
02/11/10 09:36 PM
02/11/10 09:36 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,866
N. of 8mile, S. of heaven
Spike Offline
Go Blue!!
Spike  Offline
Go Blue!!

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,866
N. of 8mile, S. of heaven
Look up a couple post, I pretty much answered this question.

Re: Synthetic vs. conventional oil? [Re: Spike] #605534
02/11/10 10:22 PM
02/11/10 10:22 PM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 21,844
Kirkland, Washington
Pacnorthcuda Offline
Too Many Posts
Pacnorthcuda  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 21,844
Kirkland, Washington
Quote:

Look up a couple post, I pretty much answered this question.




Not from what I can see. I remember years ago, way back in the 80'S & 90's they were sold on a bypass filter design (made by Hastings--good company) that was not full flow. Thats how they were able to filter to a much finer particle size while maintaining flow to the engine.....BBBBUUUUTTTTT a bypass design can let very dangerous particle pass, until the stars align and its caught.

Re: Synthetic vs. conventional oil? [Re: dOc !] #605535
02/12/10 07:06 AM
02/12/10 07:06 AM
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,285
Pacific NW USA
CompSyn Offline
pro stock
CompSyn  Offline
pro stock

Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,285
Pacific NW USA
Quote:

Hay CS ..... you sure have some DATA ......

BUT WHAT about the "contaminants" such as raw fuel, condensation and piston-ring blowby?

Are you suggesting that the "glass-media" filters will FILTER that all out?




Hi Doc,

Great question. I'll try and anwser that.

While advancements in oil and filter technology have greatly improved over the years, we're not saying they will work miracles. Extended oil change intervals are recommended for mechanically sound, non-modified engines. If you have too much raw fuel getting into your motor oil and excessive piston blow-by, then this particular engine would not be recommended for an extended oil change interval. It would not be mechanically sound.

If you have too much condensation getting into the oil by means of short distance stop and go driving, then this would be considered severe service and the oil change interval would need to be reduced. There are normal and severe service recommendations for extended oil change intervals.

The best thing to do is get a Used Oil Analysis done on your vehicle. This will tell you how long your oil will last given your engine type, driving habits, and oil/oil filter/air filter combo.

Keep the questions coming...

Re: Synthetic vs. conventional oil? [Re: MoparforLife] #605536
02/12/10 07:10 AM
02/12/10 07:10 AM
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,285
Pacific NW USA
CompSyn Offline
pro stock
CompSyn  Offline
pro stock

Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,285
Pacific NW USA
Quote:

Yeah and these new and improved oils can't even handle the punishment of a flat tappet cam like the older 'poor' quality oils could handle. Really an improvement




Simply not true. Like anything else, you have to get the right oil for the right application, e.g., race oil for race engines and passenger car oil for passenger cars.

Re: Synthetic vs. conventional oil? [Re: deansrr] #605537
02/12/10 07:27 AM
02/12/10 07:27 AM
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,285
Pacific NW USA
CompSyn Offline
pro stock
CompSyn  Offline
pro stock

Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,285
Pacific NW USA
Quote:

"IF" thats key word, I do agree with your stats, but the problem is everyday consumers aren't big on doing the IF's.




Yes I agree with you. Many everyday consumers don't know what 5W-30 means much less what makes an extended oil change possible. There lives are too busy and they just want to take their car to somebody and have their oil changed, case closed.

However, the unfortunate thing is, many of the auto care specialists these everyday people trust are set in their ways and are afraid to look at new and often better ways of doing things. So these everyday people will probably never know the difference and that there are options to over-frequent oil changes.

Re: Synthetic vs. conventional oil? [Re: Pacnorthcuda] #605538
02/12/10 07:42 AM
02/12/10 07:42 AM
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,285
Pacific NW USA
CompSyn Offline
pro stock
CompSyn  Offline
pro stock

Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,285
Pacific NW USA
Quote:

Not from what I can see. I remember years ago, way back in the 80'S & 90's they were sold on a bypass filter design (made by Hastings--good company) that was not full flow. Thats how they were able to filter to a much finer particle size while maintaining flow to the engine.....BBBBUUUUTTTTT a bypass design can let very dangerous particle pass, until the stars align and its caught.




The by-pass systems used now incorporate both full-flow and by-pass filters in series with each other. One filter does 100% of the oil 100% of the time and the other filter takes 10% of the oil and filters it very slowly. Another benefit to these types of systems is they increase oil capacity due to having two larger oil filters. Some semi-trucks come standard with such by-pass systems from the factory.

Even though by-pass systems are still available, I believe the glass media OEM spin-on type filters have absorbed some of their market share.

Re: Synthetic vs. conventional oil? [Re: CompSyn] #605539
02/12/10 07:43 AM
02/12/10 07:43 AM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,244
Eastern,NC
6
68GTS383 Offline
pro stock
68GTS383  Offline
pro stock
6

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,244
Eastern,NC
Not worth the money! Back in 98 a friend bought a new Dodge Ram 318 eng 4X4.On his first oil change he changed to Mobil synthetic. He changed the oil religiously at suggested intervails and only burned high test gasoline. At 113,000 he lost all oil pressure. When he dropped the oil pan the sludge was deep enough it had blocked the oil pickup completely.I saw this myself and could not beleive it! Save your money,use regular oil and change at recommended miles. I have used Pennzoil for 35 years and never had one have sludge build up in the oil pan!

Re: Synthetic vs. conventional oil? [Re: 68GTS383] #605540
02/12/10 07:56 AM
02/12/10 07:56 AM
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,285
Pacific NW USA
CompSyn Offline
pro stock
CompSyn  Offline
pro stock

Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,285
Pacific NW USA
Quote:

Not worth the money! Back in 98 a friend bought a new Dodge Ram 318 eng 4X4.On his first oil change he changed to Mobil synthetic. He changed the oil religiously at suggested intervails and only burned high test gasoline. At 113,000 he lost all oil pressure. When he dropped the oil pan the sludge was deep enough it had blocked the oil pickup completely.I saw this myself and could not beleive it! Save your money,use regular oil and change at recommended miles. I have used Pennzoil for 35 years and never had one have sludge build up in the oil pan!




I believe you that something went terribly wrong with your friends truck. The question is how do you know the motor oil was the direct cause and not some other issue or combination of issues?

Re: Synthetic vs. conventional oil? [Re: CompSyn] #605541
02/12/10 09:35 AM
02/12/10 09:35 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,200
Upper Midwest
M
MoparforLife Offline
Too Many Posts
MoparforLife  Offline
Too Many Posts
M

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,200
Upper Midwest
Guy that are advocating the extended oil changes act and
or suggest that frequent changing of oil is almost harmful.
What is it hurting. If a person wants to change his/her oil at the recommended intervals or sooner than the manufactureer recommends, so what. The average driver will probably change oil 5 or 6 times a year at 3000/3500 mileage range or 3 times a year at 7000 miles. A savings of maybe 60 bucks a year. WOW.
If you want to extend your changes fine - for those that don't and want to go by recommendations or sooner. It isn't hurting you, and it sure as heck isn't hurting the engine.

Re: Synthetic vs. conventional oil? [Re: CompSyn] #605542
02/12/10 10:00 AM
02/12/10 10:00 AM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,244
Eastern,NC
6
68GTS383 Offline
pro stock
68GTS383  Offline
pro stock
6

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,244
Eastern,NC
Since you are an oil salesman lets take oil out of this picture. What other issues or combination of issues can put 2 inches of sludge in an oilpan in 113k miles? I have pulled engines apart with 100k plus miles that you could read all of the casting #s on the head and with no sludge in the oil pan.These engines never saw synthetic oil.I am not saying that synthetic oils are not good,I am saying that they are not worth 3 or 4 times the price of any good name brand.

Re: Synthetic vs. conventional oil? [Re: 68GTS383] #605543
02/12/10 10:46 AM
02/12/10 10:46 AM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,034
NW Indiana
deansrr Offline
top fuel
deansrr  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,034
NW Indiana
CS, please give your opinon on high mileage oils, such as Valvoline Maxlife 75,000 plus oil and other brands, thanks, dean (just love the banna)


1973 Road Runner 1974 Satellite (for sale) 1973 240z (wifes) 1993 Ramcharger (thanks Devil) 2002 Honda S2000
Re: Synthetic vs. conventional oil? [Re: MoparforLife] #605544
02/13/10 10:17 AM
02/13/10 10:17 AM
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,285
Pacific NW USA
CompSyn Offline
pro stock
CompSyn  Offline
pro stock

Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,285
Pacific NW USA
Quote:

Guy that are advocating the extended oil changes act and
or suggest that frequent changing of oil is almost harmful.
What is it hurting. If a person wants to change his/her oil at the recommended intervals or sooner than the manufactureer recommends, so what. The average driver will probably change oil 5 or 6 times a year at 3000/3500 mileage range or 3 times a year at 7000 miles. A savings of maybe 60 bucks a year. WOW. If you want to extend your changes fine - for those that don't and want to go by recommendations or sooner. It isn't hurting you, and it sure as heck isn't hurting the engine.




I never said that frequent oil changes were harmful. What I am saying is often times they’re unnecessary and wasteful.

From personal experience, I used change my oil every three months even though my mileage was much less than 3000-miles. It was just something I did and didn’t think differently about it. It’s kind of like paying your taxes once a year. It’s just one of those necessary things you have to do. Then I decided to research motor oils and began putting myths and misconceptions behind me.

Now I change my oil once a year in the same car I used to changed four times a year. This car sees about 5,000 to 7,500-miles a year of mostly in town stop and go driving with periodic out of town trips. My Used Oil Analysis reports tell me that by the overall condition of the oil at the 7,500-mile mark, it’s still suitable for another 3,500-miles of use.

An interesting side note, the oil analysis lab I use is the same certified lab used by ConocoPhillips, Chevron and Kendall Motor Oil to name a few companies that use them, so they are highly regarded and capable of assessing used oil samples.

Looking back to when I changed my oil every three months, I think about how much of my personal time I wasted not to mention the perfectly good oil I was throwing out... Not any more.

Re: Synthetic vs. conventional oil? [Re: 68GTS383] #605545
02/13/10 10:19 AM
02/13/10 10:19 AM
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,285
Pacific NW USA
CompSyn Offline
pro stock
CompSyn  Offline
pro stock

Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,285
Pacific NW USA
Quote:

Since you are an oil salesman lets take oil out of this picture. What other issues or combination of issues can put 2 inches of sludge in an oilpan in 113k miles? I have pulled engines apart with 100k plus miles that you could read all of the casting #s on the head and with no sludge in the oil pan.These engines never saw synthetic oil.I am not saying that synthetic oils are not good,I am saying that they are not worth 3 or 4 times the price of any good name brand.




Some issues that can increase the possibility of engine sludge:

• Faulty EGR valve
• Faulty MAF sensor
• Fuel Dilution
• Short trips under 10-miles
• Excessive engine idling

Engine oils do not cause sludge. It’s the external factors that can lessen their usable service life.

Today there is an increasing list of engines that are more prone to sludging issue due to design deficiencies. Some of this is due to the automakers trying to squeeze every last MPG from their cars in order to meet tough new government fuel economy standards. I’m sure many of these sludgging issues will be blamed on motor oil and not the actual root cause of the problem.

Re: Synthetic vs. conventional oil? [Re: deansrr] #605546
02/13/10 10:23 AM
02/13/10 10:23 AM
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,285
Pacific NW USA
CompSyn Offline
pro stock
CompSyn  Offline
pro stock

Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,285
Pacific NW USA
Quote:

CS, please give your opinon on high mileage oils, such as Valvoline Maxlife 75,000 plus oil and other brands, thanks, dean (just love the banna)




If you compare the product data sheets of Valvoline SynPower and Valvoline Maxlife Synthetic, there really isn’t much of a difference between the physical properties of the two oils. The Maxlife is a little thicker which is probably why the Maxlife does not have an ILSAC GF-4 Energy Conserving start burst license.

The Maxlife does have a bigger kick of Molybdenum at 300ppm vs. SynPowers 4ppm. Molybdenum is an anti-wear agent used in some motor oils.

Both oils utilize Group III base stocks meaning they are highly refined from crude oil.

Both oils have a Total Base Number of 8.3 so they should have no problem maintaining there detergency for 5,000-to-6,000-miles even though Valvoline does not promote nor warrant any of their motor oils to go past 3,000-miles/Three Months.

They claim there are a lot “special additives” in the Maxlife for older engines, but other than the added Molybdenum we don’t know the type and quantities.

I doubt you’d notice a difference if you compared both oils side by side with used oil analysis. I’d say, pick one you like and use it.

Re: Synthetic vs. conventional oil? [Re: CompSyn] #605547
02/13/10 12:47 PM
02/13/10 12:47 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,423
Kalispell Mt.
H
HotRodDave Offline
I Live Here
HotRodDave  Offline
I Live Here
H

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,423
Kalispell Mt.
Quote:

Quote:

Since you are an oil salesman lets take oil out of this picture. What other issues or combination of issues can put 2 inches of sludge in an oilpan in 113k miles? I have pulled engines apart with 100k plus miles that you could read all of the casting #s on the head and with no sludge in the oil pan.These engines never saw synthetic oil.I am not saying that synthetic oils are not good,I am saying that they are not worth 3 or 4 times the price of any good name brand.




Some issues that can increase the possibility of engine sludge:

• Faulty EGR valve
• Faulty MAF sensor
• Fuel Dilution
• Short trips under 10-miles
• Excessive engine idling

Engine oils do not cause sludge. It’s the external factors that can lessen their usable service life.

Today there is an increasing list of engines that are more prone to sludging issue due to design deficiencies. Some of this is due to the automakers trying to squeeze every last MPG from their cars in order to meet tough new government fuel economy standards. I’m sure many of these sludgging issues will be blamed on motor oil and not the actual root cause of the problem.



Just FYI there is no MAF or EGR on that truck.

A bit of a different subject here but I am curious and mabey you can answer this, how come small engines usually specifically recomend non-detergent oils?


I am not causing global warming, I am just trying to hold off a impending Ice Age!



Page 3 of 4 1 2 3 4






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1