|
|
Re: 64 Chrysler 300
[Re: Nukechargerboy]
#528431
11/17/09 09:03 AM
11/17/09 09:03 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 21,076
Niles , Ohio
therocks
oh wait.but hey.lets see.oh yeah.
|
oh wait.but hey.lets see.oh yeah.
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 21,076
Niles , Ohio
|
73 up C body should bolt right in I believe.It should have the larger C body ball joints.My kids 62 300 uses the smaller B body style.Rocky
Chrysler Firepower
|
|
|
Re: 64 Chrysler 300
[Re: therocks]
#528433
11/17/09 10:49 AM
11/17/09 10:49 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,588
St. John's Newfoundland
440newport
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,588
St. John's Newfoundland
|
Quote:
73 up C body should bolt right in I believe.It should have the larger C body ball joints.My kids 62 300 uses the smaller B body style.Rocky
64 still uses the smaller style as well. I believe a later FMJ knuckle will bolt on using the original lower ball joint.
|
|
|
Re: 64 Chrysler 300
[Re: 440newport]
#528434
11/17/09 01:04 PM
11/17/09 01:04 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 21,076
Niles , Ohio
therocks
oh wait.but hey.lets see.oh yeah.
|
oh wait.but hey.lets see.oh yeah.
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 21,076
Niles , Ohio
|
Some used the C ball joints.I know in 62 the NewYorker and the some 300H used them.The standard 300 uses the B style.Been there done it on his 62.If it uses the Bs then the later F Ms etc will work. Rocky
Chrysler Firepower
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
