Re: BENCH RACING: 8-71 V.S. Procharger?
[Re: moparniac]
#518039
11/07/09 08:00 PM
11/07/09 08:00 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,766 Central Valley, CA.
Quicksilver440
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,766
Central Valley, CA.
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
procharger...... bigtimeauto runs one and is way faster than metalstorm and hits roots by like 2 seconds.....
Wow! Don't take any advice from this guy concerning superchargers. That is funny!
this is benchracing
So...in benchracing, one type of blower is better because the car is 2 seconds faster regardless of vehicle weight, boost, engine size, head design, etc? No offense....that sounds like what I hear when most ricers talk about their 18 second cars...a bunch of nonsense.
|
|
|
Re: BENCH RACING: 8-71 V.S. Procharger?
[Re: Quicksilver440]
#518040
11/07/09 08:30 PM
11/07/09 08:30 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,030 Tulsa OK
Bad340fish
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,030
Tulsa OK
|
I think they both can make good power under the right circumstances. The roots look however is very cool.
I think the show car crowd has tarnished the roots blower for me. To many 12 second roots blown cars with spare tire sized blower pulleys lol.
68 Barracuda Formula S 340
|
|
|
Re: BENCH RACING: 8-71 V.S. Procharger?
[Re: Triple Threat]
#518043
11/07/09 09:12 PM
11/07/09 09:12 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 8,647 ELYRIA,OH
blownzoom440
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 8,647
ELYRIA,OH
|
Quote:
Quote:
I would just go with a screw
Here is your winner .....
OH SURE take the obvious.
|
|
|
Re: BENCH RACING: 8-71 V.S. Procharger?
[Re: blown572dart]
#518044
11/07/09 09:16 PM
11/07/09 09:16 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,578 sweden
1Fast340
master
|
master
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,578
sweden
|
Quote:
I would just go with a screw
+1 but im kind of biased.
|
|
|
Re: BENCH RACING: 8-71 V.S. Procharger?
[Re: Quicksilver440]
#518045
11/07/09 09:17 PM
11/07/09 09:17 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 977 Colorado
506RR
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 977
Colorado
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
procharger...... bigtimeauto runs one and is way faster than metalstorm and hits roots by like 2 seconds.....
Wow! Don't take any advice from this guy concerning superchargers. That is funny!
this is benchracing
So...in benchracing, one type of blower is better because the car is 2 seconds faster regardless of vehicle weight, boost, engine size, head design, etc? No offense....that sounds like what I hear when most ricers talk about their 18 second cars...a bunch of nonsense.
As said, don't listen to anything he has to say about superchargers!
|
|
|
Re: BENCH RACING: 8-71 V.S. Procharger?
[Re: 62SAVOY]
#518048
11/07/09 11:20 PM
11/07/09 11:20 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,646 Plymouth Meeting, PA
bigtimeauto
Trophy Winner
|
Trophy Winner
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,646
Plymouth Meeting, PA
|
WOW, tons of misinformation here i'm flattered! Just buy what you want....... but there is no way a 6 0r 8/71 roots with carbs on gas will drive around a procharger on gas. Now a roots injected on alky well thats a whole different story.(so is that C rotor screw) My street car: 3150lbs NO intercooler cheap Blow thru single 4150 carb can drive it anywhere, we took it to lunch and a ride today as a matter of fact. ......it still has not made a full power pass yet
BB, TT5,Procharged 3300lb Street Car 4.79/154
|
|
|
Re: BENCH RACING: 8-71 V.S. Procharger?
[Re: bigtimeauto]
#518049
11/07/09 11:31 PM
11/07/09 11:31 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,766 Central Valley, CA.
Quicksilver440
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,766
Central Valley, CA.
|
Quote:
WOW, tons of misinformation here i'm flattered!
Just buy what you want....... but there is no way a 6 0r 8/71 roots with carbs on gas will drive around a procharger on gas. Now a roots injected on alky well thats a whole different story.(so is that C rotor screw)
My street car:
3150lbs NO intercooler cheap Blow thru single 4150 carb can drive it anywhere, we took it to lunch and a ride today as a matter of fact. ......it still has not made a full power pass yet
I didn't mean that roots is bettr...I was just questioning the logic of his question.
Big time...how much compression? Race gas? pump? How is drivability with the blow though? I've always wanted to do that....
|
|
|
Re: BENCH RACING: 8-71 V.S. Procharger?
[Re: bigtimeauto]
#518050
11/07/09 11:34 PM
11/07/09 11:34 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,646 Plymouth Meeting, PA
bigtimeauto
Trophy Winner
|
Trophy Winner
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,646
Plymouth Meeting, PA
|
Now on topic:
Roots on the street Pros: positive displacement great car show appeal great WOW appeal driving down the road cons: Heavy needs two carbs or ... can't see past it with carbs and air filters can't use a air to air intercooler is way high and atrracts the wrong kind of attention can only run low boost on pump fuel because of all of the heat it makes
Procharger on the street pro's: no hood issues. only need one 4150 carb the cops can't see it builds less heat lighter than a roots easier to package can use your existing intake intercooling does not impact your vision can use a air to air intercooler Cons: hmmm none i can think of
BB, TT5,Procharged 3300lb Street Car 4.79/154
|
|
|
Post deleted by Defbob
[Re: moparniac]
#518055
11/08/09 08:28 AM
11/08/09 08:28 AM
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
|
|
|
Re: BENCH RACING: 8-71 V.S. Procharger?
[Re: blownzoom440]
#518057
11/08/09 11:32 AM
11/08/09 11:32 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,244 Canada
Kam*Kuda
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,244
Canada
|
Quote:
how much does the procharger complete weigh? you are right i cant see past my blower. a plus for me is a stock carb[s] will do.not boost referenced[race only] my blower weighs 70lbs intercooler 40+5 gall of water 40+lbs
My D1X procharger weights 22.5 lbs but that is without much oil in it, My intercooler (including BOV) 31x 12 x 3.5 and weights in at 26.5 lbs
About 50lbs all together
Last edited by Kam*Kuda; 11/08/09 11:37 AM.
1970 Barracuda Convertible 1968 Satellite Street Strip car 1654.5 Mustang 1955 Land Rover
|
|
|
|
|