Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Re: 70 Challenger T/A - Engine Detailing - Whats correct? [Re: Alaskan_TA] #511141
11/03/09 01:47 AM
11/03/09 01:47 AM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 306
Texas
B
bogusracer Offline OP
enthusiast
bogusracer  Offline OP
enthusiast
B

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 306
Texas
Quote:

G-series drawing that has nothing to do with 1970 cars. The 1971 cars did not get built.






Barry,

Wouldn't this be applicable to the N95 cars built after this engineering drawing date - since the 1970 N95 cars were what all 71 model cars got for emissions controls?

Also isn't the washer bottle on a 70 Model E-Body supposed to have a square corner. The one on the car looks like a 71 model?

Bogusracer

Re: 70 Challenger T/A - Engine Detailing - Whats correct? [Re: jrwoodjoe] #511142
11/03/09 01:59 PM
11/03/09 01:59 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,957
West Coast, CA
T
Troy Offline
master
Troy  Offline
master
T

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,957
West Coast, CA
Quote:

I would like to know where you can get the black plastic covers for the carbs like Troy has in his pic?

Joe




That is kinda cool huh?!? I made that out of aluminum strap and wood. It keeps the birds out of the carbs.


....there is nothing like driving my 1968 Hemi Dart around town and having people looking at you like you're nuts!!
Re: 70 Challenger T/A - Engine Detailing - Whats correct? [Re: bogusracer] #511143
11/03/09 02:04 PM
11/03/09 02:04 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,957
West Coast, CA
T
Troy Offline
master
Troy  Offline
master
T

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,957
West Coast, CA
Quote:

Quote:

What color should the oil dip stick handle/loop and dip stick tube be?




Anyone who can answer this question above?

Bogusracer




The majority of the ones that I have seen had a black painted handle.


....there is nothing like driving my 1968 Hemi Dart around town and having people looking at you like you're nuts!!
Re: 70 Challenger T/A - Engine Detailing - Whats correct? [Re: ScottSmith_Harms] #511144
11/03/09 02:12 PM
11/03/09 02:12 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,957
West Coast, CA
T
Troy Offline
master
Troy  Offline
master
T

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,957
West Coast, CA
Quote:

One thing for sure, the alternator on Troys car, while certainly nice, is not properly detailed.




You are correct my "good" alternator looks good but does not work. I spent some real good money with Frank B. and that thing screams like a PIG!!!


....there is nothing like driving my 1968 Hemi Dart around town and having people looking at you like you're nuts!!
Re: 70 Challenger T/A - Engine Detailing - Whats correct? [Re: Troy] #511145
11/04/09 09:33 AM
11/04/09 09:33 AM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,940
New Jersey Bada Bing
bremotorsports Offline
master
bremotorsports  Offline
master

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,940
New Jersey Bada Bing
Troy,

This is the first time I have seen these photos.

A job well done.

Bill Rolik

P.S. I have the tags for the negative cable on hand.

Re: 70 Challenger T/A - Engine Detailing - Whats correct? [Re: Troy] #511146
11/04/09 11:27 AM
11/04/09 11:27 AM
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 8,526
Tenn.
jrwoodjoe Offline
master
jrwoodjoe  Offline
master

Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 8,526
Tenn.
Quote:

Quote:

I would like to know where you can get the black plastic covers for the carbs like Troy has in his pic?

Joe




That is kinda cool huh?!? I made that out of aluminum strap and wood. It keeps the birds out of the carbs.




Looked like plastic in the pics. Very Neat!



65 Barracuda
70 Challenger
Re: 70 Challenger T/A - Engine Detailing - Whats correct? [Re: jrwoodjoe] #511147
11/04/09 01:07 PM
11/04/09 01:07 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,595
So Cal
autoxcuda Offline
Too Many Posts
autoxcuda  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,595
So Cal
An in-progress of Troy's car with some "stuff" out of the way.


Re: 70 Challenger T/A - Engine Detailing - Whats correct? [Re: bogusracer] #511148
11/05/09 02:09 PM
11/05/09 02:09 PM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,294
Ontario, Canada
FJ5_Fish Offline
pro stock
FJ5_Fish  Offline
pro stock

Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,294
Ontario, Canada
Quote:

Quote:

G-series drawing that has nothing to do with 1970 cars. The 1971 cars did not get built.






Barry,

Wouldn't this be applicable to the N95 cars built after this engineering drawing date - since the 1970 N95 cars were what all 71 model cars got for emissions controls?

Also isn't the washer bottle on a 70 Model E-Body supposed to have a square corner. The one on the car looks like a 71 model?

Bogusracer




Yup - That is a '71 bottle, wrong battery cables, no paint on negative cable, spark plug wire holders or exhaust bolts...all minor things - easily corrected. Looks nice.

Re: 70 Challenger T/A - Engine Detailing - Whats correct? [Re: FJ5_Fish] #511149
11/05/09 06:12 PM
11/05/09 06:12 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,957
West Coast, CA
T
Troy Offline
master
Troy  Offline
master
T

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,957
West Coast, CA
Quote:

yup - That is a '71 bottle, wrong battery cables, no paint on negative cable, spark plug wire holders or exhaust bolts...all minor things - easily corrected. Looks nice.




.......you might want to check your notes and try again because you just failed the "T/A 101" class.


....there is nothing like driving my 1968 Hemi Dart around town and having people looking at you like you're nuts!!
Re: 70 Challenger T/A - Engine Detailing - Whats correct? [Re: Troy] #511150
11/05/09 06:54 PM
11/05/09 06:54 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 21,932
Enjoy life today, It has an ex...
gtx6970 Offline
Too Many Posts
gtx6970  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 21,932
Enjoy life today, It has an ex...
Troy,
I know we've had the talk about the washer reservoir so I'm not going there.

I can see the manifolds were previously engine color as the dark border near the head surface is seen.
I had several pics ( lost them all in a PC crash last year) of unrestored T/A 340's and all had natural white spark plug wire clips.


BUT, I gotta question the battery cables. The positive cable has the common grey starter relay lead of the cable thats still avail today,,, Shouldn't it be a medium brown color and a dished lead ends ..
If I'm wrong I apologies in advance


Enjoy life today, It has an expiration date
Re: 70 Challenger T/A - Engine Detailing - Whats correct? [Re: Troy] #511151
11/05/09 07:37 PM
11/05/09 07:37 PM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,294
Ontario, Canada
FJ5_Fish Offline
pro stock
FJ5_Fish  Offline
pro stock

Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,294
Ontario, Canada
Quote:

Quote:

yup - That is a '71 bottle, wrong battery cables, no paint on negative cable, spark plug wire holders or exhaust bolts...all minor things - easily corrected. Looks nice.




.......you might want to check your notes and try again because you just failed the "T/A 101" class.




Really?

The 1970 Washer Bottle is a one year only piece. I have seen plenty of early '71's with leftover 70 parts but I have never seen a '70 with '71 parts (from the factory) on them. The over the counter washer bottle replacement would have been the '71 style. After almost 40 years a replacement bottle would look like the right age. All '70 E-Bodies I have or have seen (Including all my T/A's and AAR's have the 70 style washer bottle.

Galino Groovy started the foolish myth that smallblock negative cables were not on the engine when painted...more BS. I have loads of proof that they were on and painted.

Wire holders - I have seen both ways but the paint did not stick well on those. Most I have had were painted.

I agree with others that stated an engine color dipstick tube and black handle - on a 70. The 69 340's tube and stick were painted Blue - engine color.

Misc. Stuff I have found...

The distrbutor hold-downs are copper plated.

The fuel pumps were painted on the engine.

The loose washer (found on many untouched cars) under the intake bolt (which have a captive washer) are brass or copper.

T/A's used Organosol on the cowl and fenders. The cowls were masked off and not free-hand as on other e-bodies.

Most Trans-Am (only) cars have 2 plugs in the floor similar to the rubber-steel plugs for the rear shock towers in the trunk but about half the diameter. I have never seen these on anything other than a Trans-Am car.

Re: 70 Challenger T/A - Engine Detailing - Whats correct? [Re: gtx6970] #511152
11/05/09 11:50 PM
11/05/09 11:50 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,957
West Coast, CA
T
Troy Offline
master
Troy  Offline
master
T

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,957
West Coast, CA
Quote:

Troy,
BUT, I gotta question the battery cables. The positive cable has the common grey starter relay lead of the cable that's still avail today,,, Shouldn't it be a medium brown color and a dished lead ends ..
If I'm wrong I apologies in advance




Hi Bill, hope all is well. Both the positive and the negative cables are repops and your correct about the colors. If you take a original positive cable and lay it up against a assembline cable....there is a big difference. As for the negative cable, they do look closer however I believe in late 70 and on, one of the big differences in the negative cable is the end that bolts up to the head. There is a large rubber block at the end. It is about 3/4 long, sticks up about 3/16 and it goes all the way around the cable.

Here is a good picture of what I'm talking about on a low milage T/A....

The funny thing is all of the original T/As that I have seen all had this negative cable (with the big end on it) AND it was not painted on the engine.

I have seen many 340 4 bbl engines where the negative was painted....why not on the T/As....I don't know.

5589066-Wiring30.JPG (464 downloads)

....there is nothing like driving my 1968 Hemi Dart around town and having people looking at you like you're nuts!!
Re: 70 Challenger T/A - Engine Detailing - Whats correct? [Re: FJ5_Fish] #511153
11/06/09 12:15 AM
11/06/09 12:15 AM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,957
West Coast, CA
T
Troy Offline
master
Troy  Offline
master
T

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,957
West Coast, CA
Quote:


The 1970 Washer Bottle is a one year only piece. I have seen plenty of early '71's with leftover 70 parts but I have never seen a '70 with '71 parts (from the factory) on them. The over the counter washer bottle replacement would have been the '71 style. After almost 40 years a replacement bottle would look like the right age. All '70 E-Bodies I have or have seen (Including all my T/A's and AAR's have the 70 style washer bottle.

Galino Groovy started the foolish myth that smallblock negative cables were not on the engine when painted...more BS. I have loads of proof that they were on and painted.

Wire holders - I have seen both ways but the paint did not stick well on those. Most I have had were painted.

I agree with others that stated an engine color dipstick tube and black handle - on a 70. The 69 340's tube and stick were painted Blue - engine color.

Misc. Stuff I have found...

The distributor hold-downs are copper plated.

The fuel pumps were painted on the engine.

The loose washer (found on many untouched cars) under the intake bolt (which have a captive washer) are brass or copper.

T/A's used Organosol on the cowl and fenders. The cowls were masked off and not free-hand as on other e-bodies.

Most Trans-Am (only) cars have 2 plugs in the floor similar to the rubber-steel plugs for the rear shock towers in the trunk but about half the diameter. I have never seen these on anything other than a Trans-Am car.




Hi Jimmy, or is it Ed
Here is what I will do. I will try and address each question as you posted them and see if we can shed a little light on things.

First off the washer bottle. This is a fun one!! I don't know why but it seems like many of the late run T/As had the 71 bottles in them. Maybe it was a Hamtramak thing, maybe it was a T/A thing but I do know that none or the AARs had the 71 bottle, only the T/A.

Here is a picture of a very low milage T/A with a 71 bottle in it...

5589109-EngineBay12.jpg (385 downloads)
Last edited by Troy; 11/06/09 12:34 AM.

....there is nothing like driving my 1968 Hemi Dart around town and having people looking at you like you're nuts!!
Re: 70 Challenger T/A - Engine Detailing - Whats correct? [Re: FJ5_Fish] #511154
11/06/09 12:18 AM
11/06/09 12:18 AM
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 86
W
wate Offline
member
wate  Offline
member
W

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 86
I'm a stranger to these topics and normally don't comment but there are other corrections needed that I see on almost every restored E body. Seems like these just get perpetuated (I have a DVD for $3.98 if you want to know what that word means)
So above experts with your diagrams, etc. why have you never commented on these details?? guess you want to get paid??? $16 for your piggy bank?? Can I just send you a DONATION in a white envelope? keep your DVD!

Wiper hose routing- return hose from reservoir always came back along the firewall, routed up through the black heavy firewall clip above the junction box, wrapped up and behind the wiper motor and then exited above the wiper motor through that small hole that's on the lip. I've seen this correctly done less than 5 times in years of looking at restored cars. What do you think that hole is for??

Heater hoses attached to inner fender??? that's fine for big blocks and small block A bodies, not cudas or challengers. small block E bodies heater hoses didn't attach to the inner fender. as I told a mopar car judge who pointed out my mistake of NOT attaching them to the inner fender, REFER TO THE SERVICE MANUAL, it's in there!! Why do you think the alternator bracket is so tall??

6 pak vaccuum hoses always S clipped to the fuel lines, all three of them. never see this correctly done. doesn't make sense to have the hoses flopping around?? they didn't!

engine wiring harness between alternator and horns always routed across and through the large black clip. again, can't have wires flopping around in there!

spark plug wire holders always painted, never white! Yikes!!!

I can't take anymore, back to my Mopar cave............

Re: 70 Challenger T/A - Engine Detailing - Whats correct? [Re: Troy] #511155
11/06/09 12:19 AM
11/06/09 12:19 AM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,957
West Coast, CA
T
Troy Offline
master
Troy  Offline
master
T

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,957
West Coast, CA
Here is a picture of the bottle that came out of my car....to be honest with you I still have it somewhere.


....there is nothing like driving my 1968 Hemi Dart around town and having people looking at you like you're nuts!!
Re: 70 Challenger T/A - Engine Detailing - Whats correct? [Re: Troy] #511156
11/06/09 12:23 AM
11/06/09 12:23 AM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,957
West Coast, CA
T
Troy Offline
master
Troy  Offline
master
T

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,957
West Coast, CA
....here's a good one, I love this car!! This is a very low milage T/A that I saw at Carlisle a few years ago. Very original....only a few things ever changed on it. Check out the washer bottle!!

5589120-TAREFPIC037.jpg (502 downloads)

....there is nothing like driving my 1968 Hemi Dart around town and having people looking at you like you're nuts!!
Re: 70 Challenger T/A - Engine Detailing - Whats correct? [Re: Troy] #511157
11/06/09 12:24 AM
11/06/09 12:24 AM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,957
West Coast, CA
T
Troy Offline
master
Troy  Offline
master
T

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,957
West Coast, CA
....same car, check out the Negative battery cable.

5589124-TAREFPIC020.jpg (462 downloads)

....there is nothing like driving my 1968 Hemi Dart around town and having people looking at you like you're nuts!!
Re: 70 Challenger T/A - Engine Detailing - Whats correct? [Re: Troy] #511158
11/06/09 12:28 AM
11/06/09 12:28 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 29,679
Hamtramck, PA
A
Alaskan_TA Offline
Fluffy Balladeer
Alaskan_TA  Offline
Fluffy Balladeer
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 29,679
Hamtramck, PA
Mine has the so-called "71" bottle as well. Date code on the pump is the 107th day of 1970.


For the guy that asked about 1970 vs. 1971 N95, the 1970 system was ECS & the 1971 system was NOX. There may be some similarities, but there are deffinate differences.

Re: 70 Challenger T/A - Engine Detailing - Whats correct? [Re: wate] #511159
11/06/09 12:42 AM
11/06/09 12:42 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 29,679
Hamtramck, PA
A
Alaskan_TA Offline
Fluffy Balladeer
Alaskan_TA  Offline
Fluffy Balladeer
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 29,679
Hamtramck, PA
Quote:


corrections needed that I see on almost every restored E body.

never

always

looking at restored cars.






I picked out some bits of what you said. Never & always? So, were you actually there taking notes on every one of these cars as they were built? If so, why are you using "restored? cars for reference?

Some of us prefer using original cars for reference, but even then we know that cars were not always built exactly the same every time.

Re: 70 Challenger T/A - Engine Detailing - Whats correct? [Re: Alaskan_TA] #511160
11/06/09 12:45 AM
11/06/09 12:45 AM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,957
West Coast, CA
T
Troy Offline
master
Troy  Offline
master
T

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,957
West Coast, CA
Here is the next one...

"Galino Groovy started the foolish myth that smallblock negative cables were not on the engine when painted...more BS. I have loads of proof that they were on and painted."

OK....where is the proof?? I'm not saying that all 340 engines did or did not have painted ends. What I personality believe is the negative cables that DO NOT have the big rubber ends got painted AND the ones with the exposed ends did get painted. The reason is the ones that had the exposed ends were prone to corrosion so they painted them. Do I have any proof of this...no, but it does make sense and this is what I have seen.

I can say this, I have never seen a painted cable with the big rubber end, AND I have never seen a cable without the big rubber end not painted. But I also never saw every car that was ever made so....

Check you photos and see what you come up with. Pictures help...

Last edited by Troy; 11/06/09 02:00 AM.

....there is nothing like driving my 1968 Hemi Dart around town and having people looking at you like you're nuts!!
Page 2 of 5 1 2 3 4 5






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1