Re: 440 Engine Pad Decoding
[Re: GODSCOUNTRY340]
#51112
01/06/08 06:02 PM
01/06/08 06:02 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 42,714 Spokane Washington
ScottSmith_Harms
Mr Wizzard
|
Mr Wizzard
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 42,714
Spokane Washington
|
Quote:
Thanks 426HEMIDAVE. It would seem the '69 Six Pack blocks don't have the magical "C". I've encountered three '70 six pack blocks that all did. I've got one in my garage right now. You're also correct about the other '70 440 engines, they don't all have the six pack rods. I own a factory '70 440 "U" code 'Cuda HP that does NOT have six pack rods in the engine. There may be no way of clearly telling a '69 Six pack from a 4 bbl. engine except for the VIN. The "C" started appearing in the 1970 engines.
You guys don't need to back each other up concerning the 1970 440's all having the heavier six pack internals or not, I made a blanket statement concerning what internals a 70 440 would have. I'm the first one to admit that Chrysler was a bit hit or miss when it came to "standard" procedures or parts, exceptions are more common than not. I will say that all 70 440's SHOULD have had the Six Pack internals as it was a design change that was made accross the board after having a number of lower end failures with the 691/2 cars. That being said it's quite possible the some 70 cars still recieved the lighter weight parts, especially early built cars.
My main reason for posting in the first place is that there has been a TON of misinformation tossed around about "how to id a 440+6 block", and the bottom line is simple, it's all tied in to the VIN# and some other basic stamping features that any regular 440 HP could also have (including the C stamp).
There's no other sure fire way to tell one from the other except for the VIN, no C, no secret stampings, no decoder ring required.
|
|
|
Re: 440 Engine Pad Decoding
[Re: ScottSmith_Harms]
#51113
01/06/08 06:57 PM
01/06/08 06:57 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,530 God's Country Maryland
GODSCOUNTRY340
master
|
master
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,530
God's Country Maryland
|
You may be correct there. My '70 'Cuda was built in Oct. 1969 so it would probably be considered an early build car. There were most likely 440 Six Pack engines built without the "C" stamps but every block I've seen with the "C" stamps ('70 & '71) has been a Six Pack. Nothing is certain in the Mopar world.
I love the smell of Deer guts in the morning, it smells like... VICTORY!
|
|
|
Re: 440 Engine Pad Decoding
[Re: GODSCOUNTRY340]
#51114
01/06/08 07:32 PM
01/06/08 07:32 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 17,519 Las Vegas, NV
6bblgt
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 17,519
Las Vegas, NV
|
Scott, I think you're not making the point, you are trying to make.
1970 440s: T - 350 hp - steel crank, "LY" rods, STD balancer U - 375 hp - steel crank, H.D. rods, counterweight balancer V - 390 hp - steel crank, H.D. rods, counterweight balancer
The '70 "T" engine was never available in a B or E-body, so those plants never had need for the "LY" rods, but the balancer was the same as the 383s. I'd be more inclined to believe any '70 440'Cuda with "LY" rods in its original numbers matching block has had engine work early in its life, after the warranty was gone. The used/rebuilt H.D. ("six pack") rods would've been harder to come by at the rebuilders.
|
|
|
Re: 440 Engine Pad Decoding
[Re: Hemidavey]
#51115
01/06/08 07:52 PM
01/06/08 07:52 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,082 U.S.S.A.
JohnRR
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,082
U.S.S.A.
|
Quote:
I have a 70 six pack engine in the shop, it has the c your talking of and its an original 6 pack engine. also has HP 2. The C is a designation for special crank and rods. As far as ALL 70 engines having the special parts, its BS. I've owned 3 that were stock engines that all had std rods, pistons and crank. As far as secret goes, are we not here to help each other?
dave its not all 70 440's , only 6pk and HP , the 4bbl c barge motors had LY rods and internal balance dampners , only the 6pk engine has a piston with valve reliefs , the 440 HP does not
|
|
|
|
|