|
Re: VIN Stamping: MYTH or FACT
[Re: Mopar_Mike]
#342618
03/31/11 03:03 PM
03/31/11 03:03 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,042
U.S.S.A.
JohnRR
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,042
U.S.S.A.
|
Quote:
Buy 1967 Cars (see below) We Don't Need No Stinkin VIN!!
That's right , easier to pass off as matching numbers , all you need to do is find a good dated block and such ... kidding ... 
|
|
|
Re: VIN Stamping: MYTH or FACT
[Re: Diego (not Ted)]
#342619
03/31/11 03:05 PM
03/31/11 03:05 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,042
U.S.S.A.
JohnRR
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,042
U.S.S.A.
|
Quote:
Out of curiosity, seeing a learning opportunity, I emailed the guy asking him why there were two sets of numbers on the tranny.
He said, "first set is serial # the second set i think is dates or line numbers"
Then I asked, "Shouldn't they be in the same font?"
He said, "thats how they came"
So then I asked, "From my experience, they were the same font. You sure it's #s match from the factory?"
He replied, "yes i had it a a mopar show"
I think I still have a lot to learn.
Yes you do have a lot to learn , but at least you want to learn. The trans stampings are correct , the part number/build date/sequence built fonts is always smaller than the VIN font , the trans in that auction is CORRECT factory stampings , the VIN on the block is NOT .
|
|
|
Re: VIN Stamping: MYTH or FACT *DELETED* *DELETED*
[Re: ph23vo]
#342621
03/31/11 05:03 PM
03/31/11 05:03 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,552
Sweden
71redcuda
pro stock
|
pro stock
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,552
Sweden
|
Post deleted by 71redcuda
Last edited by 71redcuda; 03/31/11 05:06 PM.
|
|
|
Re: VIN Stamping: MYTH or FACT
[Re: Paul Jacobs]
#342627
03/31/11 08:29 PM
03/31/11 08:29 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 602
N.E.Ohio
pacifica
mopar
|
mopar
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 602
N.E.Ohio
|
Quote:
That means your block is a restamp-the B is not even close in size to the 3, not to mention they aren't the same font! Sorry, that's prob not what you want to hear!
I don't see how you can be so sure. 
|
|
|
Re: VIN Stamping: MYTH or FACT
[Re: pacifica]
#342630
04/01/11 12:01 AM
04/01/11 12:01 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,039
INDIANA
Paul Jacobs
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,039
INDIANA
|
Quote:
Quote:
That means your block is a restamp-the B is not even close in size to the 3, not to mention they aren't the same font! Sorry, that's prob not what you want to hear!
I don't see how you can be so sure.
I'm not trying to come across as a know it all  - I base my statement on the 25 years restoration experience, the 50 Mopars I've owned, over 100 I've dismantled, and over 10,000 pictures to document original cars. Remember, I work on these EVERY day, so you pick up on details of parts very quickly-just like you probably know your particular job inside & out.
There are plenty of originals that are quirky, but this one is very obvious when studied.
Cheers 
|
|
|
Re: VIN Stamping: MYTH or FACT
[Re: Paul Jacobs]
#342631
04/01/11 12:28 AM
04/01/11 12:28 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,957
West Coast, CA
Troy
master
|
master
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,957
West Coast, CA
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
That means your block is a restamp-the B is not even close in size to the 3, not to mention they aren't the same font! Sorry, that's prob not what you want to hear!
I don't see how you can be so sure.
I'm not trying to come across as a know it all - I base my statement on the 25 years restoration experience, the 50 Mopars I've owned, over 100 I've dismantled, and over 10,000 pictures to document original cars. Remember, I work on these EVERY day, so you pick up on details of parts very quickly-just like you probably know your particular job inside & out.
There are plenty of originals that are quirky, but this one is very obvious when studied.
Cheers
I know a little about these cars as well and I must say that is the worst restamp I think I have ever seen.
Hi Paul, hope all is well.
....there is nothing like driving my 1968 Hemi Dart around town and having people looking at you like you're nuts!!
|
|
|
Re: VIN Stamping: MYTH or FACT
[Re: BS27R1B]
#342632
04/01/11 01:24 AM
04/01/11 01:24 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,471
renton, Washington
ph23vo
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,471
renton, Washington
|
Quote:
Quote:
What about this one,does the stamping look ok "factory" or? Block made:1-7-70
The two stampings are so different there is no way they are right. Transmission looks good, engine stamp is a mess.
they used many different letters and numbers obviously..however once you posted the trans it was clear there are 2 diff stamps used.. also the block is painted thick so that makes the block harder to see.. the trans indeed does look right.. dan
|
|
|
Re: VIN Stamping: MYTH or FACT
[Re: Morty426]
#342633
04/01/11 01:46 AM
04/01/11 01:46 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,042
U.S.S.A.
JohnRR
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,042
U.S.S.A.
|
Quote:
Quote:
trans
You got two different 3s there
Good eye , the engine was not stamped at the same time the trans was stamped judging by the difference in fonts .
|
|
|
Re: VIN Stamping: MYTH or FACT
[Re: JohnRR]
#342634
04/01/11 02:33 AM
04/01/11 02:33 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,552
Sweden
71redcuda
pro stock
|
pro stock
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,552
Sweden
|
I think the 1B159 block looks ok but the three last numbers locks wrong.
I have a few more pictures if someone is intrested..
Owned in the 90`s by Ed Briggs.The car was restored 2002-2005 by 2 brothers in Fort Wayne,Indiana. Tom and Jeff Ruble. When the car was finished it was bought by Gary S,work/worked on Atlantamusclecars.Gary sold the car in 2006 to a guy in Romeo,Michigan.
Last edited by 71redcuda; 04/01/11 03:37 AM.
|
|
|
Re: VIN Stamping: MYTH or FACT
[Re: 71redcuda]
#342635
04/01/11 02:39 AM
04/01/11 02:39 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,552
Sweden
71redcuda
pro stock
|
pro stock
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,552
Sweden
|
more.2780930-340-? Its a 1971 (E55) 340 car.
Last edited by 71redcuda; 04/01/11 02:42 AM.
|
|
|
Re: VIN Stamping: MYTH or FACT
[Re: 71redcuda]
#342636
04/01/11 04:09 AM
04/01/11 04:09 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 42,714
Spokane Washington
ScottSmith_Harms
Mr Wizzard
|
Mr Wizzard
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 42,714
Spokane Washington
|
Quote:
That means your block is a restamp-the B is not even close in size to the 3, not to mention they aren't the same font! Sorry, that's prob not what you want to hear!
I agree with Paul on this one, USUALLY the complete stamping (numbers spacing, alignment, etc.) should match very closely if not exactly, but the actual letter and number fonts should ALWAYS match in size and shape, they were each stamped moments appart by the same guy with the same stamping tooling on the production line.
|
|
|
|
|
