Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rocker ratio comparision #332480
05/29/09 01:45 PM
05/29/09 01:45 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,401
Wi.
old_racer Offline OP
pro stock
old_racer  Offline OP
pro stock

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,401
Wi.
Hi ,
any one done a back to back test going from 1.5 ratio rockers to 1.6 ratio. Is it worth it to try in stead of going the whole cam change route. this is in reference to a 440 motor with 550lift cam. just wondering if the car liked it and would pick up a little.
thanks
Russ

Re: Rocker ratio comparision [Re: old_racer] #332481
05/29/09 02:06 PM
05/29/09 02:06 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,123
Grand Haven, MI
patrick Offline
I Live Here
patrick  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,123
Grand Haven, MI
all going to depends on if the heads can support the additional flow....

if they're lightly massaged 906's, probably not worth it. if they're full boogie SR's or eddie RPM, probably.


1976 Spinnaker White Plymouth Duster, /6 A833OD
1986 Silver/Twilight Blue Chrysler 5th Ave HotRod **SOLD!***
2011 Toxic Orange Dodge Charger R/T
2017 Grand Cherokee Overland
2014 Jeep Cherokee Latitude (holy crap, my daughter is driving)
Re: Rocker ratio comparision [Re: patrick] #332482
05/29/09 02:42 PM
05/29/09 02:42 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,401
Wi.
old_racer Offline OP
pro stock
old_racer  Offline OP
pro stock

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,401
Wi.
Hi ,
the heads are real max wedge heads so they have big ports and I'm putting in 2.14 intake valves to complement the 1.88 exh.
thanks

Re: Rocker ratio comparision [Re: old_racer] #332483
05/29/09 05:17 PM
05/29/09 05:17 PM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,293
Rock Springs
Bob_Coomer Offline
master
Bob_Coomer  Offline
master

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,293
Rock Springs
Steve D did a chassis dyno years ago, on a warmed up 440. He found a few HP over the 1.5's vs the 1.6's...I bet the old article is still up over at www.moparmusclemagazine.com I bet it would be worth less than 10 hp even on a Hot full bore race engine IMO.


[color:"red"]65 Hemi Belvedere coming soon [/color]
[color:"#00FF00"]557" Indy engine 1.07 60ft 144mph in the 8th 2100 lbs package [/color]
Re: Rocker ratio comparision [Re: old_racer] #332484
05/29/09 05:26 PM
05/29/09 05:26 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY Offline
Master
MR_P_BODY  Offline
Master

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
I've done this on small blocks and most times seen a
improvement.... but only increasing the intake rockers,
gained nothing on the exhaust side(waste of money
doing the exhaust).... unless it was a REALLY small
exhaust lobe. But it will depend on your intake flow
weather it will improve... I should say at what lift

Re: Rocker ratio comparision [Re: Bob_Coomer] #332485
05/29/09 05:30 PM
05/29/09 05:30 PM

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A



russ, you might have a clearance problem going to the 1:6 rockers with the pushrods .they might rub on the sides.
i had a problem and couldnt do the swap since my motor was already assembled.

Last edited by SUPERSTOCKRACER; 05/29/09 05:32 PM.
Re: Rocker ratio comparision #332486
05/29/09 06:24 PM
05/29/09 06:24 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,695
nc
E
emarine01 Offline
master
emarine01  Offline
master
E

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,695
nc
I think if you have the right cam for the combo the gain will be small if any,If your cam is a little small and the heads can flow the extra lift you will see a good gain, For the most part the intake is more important unless you spray than the 1.6 on the exhaust will help alot

Re: Rocker ratio comparision [Re: old_racer] #332487
05/29/09 06:53 PM
05/29/09 06:53 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,078
Oregon
A
AndyF Offline
I Win
AndyF  Offline
I Win
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,078
Oregon
I've been fooling around with rocker arm ratios for awhile now and as far as I can tell, the engine always makes more power with more ratio. At least that is true on the intake side and of course, it is only true as long as the valve train can handle the extra stress.

I'm up to 1.85 on the intake side and 1.70 on the exhaust side. The next thing I might try is to drop the exhaust ratio down to 1.60 or 1.55 just to see what happens. My guess is that the power will only drop a small amount, maybe none at all.

Some engine builders have pushed up past 2.0 rocker arm ratios now in an attempt to get quicker valve action. I'm not sure what the Super Stock and Comp guys run these days but I'd be surprised if anyone was running 1.5 rocker arms in anything that was competitive.

5260969-jesel.jpg (40 downloads)
Re: Rocker ratio comparision [Re: AndyF] #332488
05/29/09 08:34 PM
05/29/09 08:34 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,401
Wi.
old_racer Offline OP
pro stock
old_racer  Offline OP
pro stock

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,401
Wi.
Hi
ok here's the deal, the reason I'm asking, is when I built my max wedge clone based on a 440 short block, I used 906 heads and I hogged on the intake port to get the max wedge intake to fit , I welded up the heat cross over. I have true 11.1 comp. 550 lift comp cams roller cam. the car runs 12.30s with max wedge exhaust manifolds thru the cut outs. I have a brand new set of max wedge mopar perf. heads I bought 5yrs ago. I was saving them cause I was going to build a stroker motor, but now I want my son to run it with me in nostalga SS a few times and I wanted to get down to the 12:00 flat class. So I thought what the heck I'll throw the real heads on. and I thought to complement them I'd try the 1.6 rockers give it a little more cam. so now what do you think.
thanks
Russ

Re: Rocker ratio comparision [Re: old_racer] #332489
06/05/09 05:54 PM
06/05/09 05:54 PM
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 490
Wis., USA
B
Bob_Fromm Offline
mopar
Bob_Fromm  Offline
mopar
B

Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 490
Wis., USA
In theory you should see an improvement but the margin of improvement is in question due to what appears a lack of real-world experience feedback. I suggest you do a few base-line runs at Rock Falls raceway and then change to the 1.6 ratio on the exhaust side as per your plan and retest. Seems that there is not a lot of real world data on this to draw from the Mopar group and this would be good information for all going forward. Thanks in advance for letting us know how this turns out.

Re: Rocker ratio comparision [Re: Bob_Fromm] #332490
06/05/09 06:42 PM
06/05/09 06:42 PM
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,910
Eighty Four, PA
B G Racing Offline
master
B G Racing  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,910
Eighty Four, PA
Basically the increased lift on the intake valve is worth the change,you won't see much from the exhaust side.Like Chris says,check your pushrod clearence.

Re: Rocker ratio comparision [Re: old_racer] #332491
06/06/09 08:19 AM
06/06/09 08:19 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,932
NC
440Jim Offline
I Live Here
440Jim  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,932
NC
Quote:

...
I used 906 heads and I hogged on the intake port to get the max wedge intake to fit , ...
I have a brand new set of max wedge mopar perf. heads


FYI, I am not sure, but depending what max wedge heads you have, they are suppose to use an offset rocker. Different than the 906 heads.


1993 Daytona, 5.50 at 130mph (1/8) 1.19 sixty ft (PG). Link to 572 B1 - Part 1






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1