|
|
|
Re: Larry Griffith's Challenger is back from graphics...
[Re: mprrlz]
#324951
05/25/09 06:07 PM
05/25/09 06:07 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,141
Phoenix,Az.
hemicop
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,141
Phoenix,Az.
|
Quote:
I seen one of the new Cobra Mustang Super Stockers and it was backhalved with big tire.
Any reason why this car wasn't built that way?
Mopar built these things as a "kit car" just like their circle-track cars in the 70s. As a result they're basically shells & you build it as you see fit. Mopar claims it'll run in something like 20 classes  . Personally I love the car & the idea--the execution both in its build & marketing was ALL wrong, IMO. Now no one knows where they'll run, what EXACTLY they'll run, who's getting 'em and if they'll even be competitive in their class.
|
|
|
Post deleted by Defbob
[Re: hemicop]
#324952
05/25/09 07:19 PM
05/25/09 07:19 PM
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
|
|
|
Re: Larry Griffith's Challenger is back from graphics...
#324953
05/25/09 09:55 PM
05/25/09 09:55 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,505
DFW
mr_340
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,505
DFW
|
The HP factors for the three engines look reasonable to me. It looks like NHRA wants people to build a few cars before someone goes out and runs it -1.5 under the index and gets an AHFS hit. I wonder if Jim Hale is building one? They factored his 383 Barracuda when he did that. I think he only hurt himself since I don't know of anyone else running a 1967. Wann has a 1969. The engines fall in these classes in Stock and SS:
6.1L - A/S(A),SS/E(A)
5.7L - E/S(A),SS/I(A)
5.9L - G/S(A),SS/J(A)
Floyd Lippencott IV
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
