Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Strange S60 bearing options 2.875 vs 3.150 #3225592
04/07/24 12:24 PM
04/07/24 12:24 PM
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 166
West Palm Beach, Florida
C
Craig J Offline OP
member
Craig J  Offline OP
member
C

Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 166
West Palm Beach, Florida
I am planning to order an S60 to replace the poorly cut down dana 60 in my Cuda installed by the previous owner, and at the same time move the springs back out to the standard location so that the shackles don't constantly hit the rear valance. mad

Filling out the Strange data sheet I noticed that they offer a mopar style housing end that will fit a 'large ford' style 3.150" OD bearing, or the housing for the standard size bearing.

Any reason I should not order the larger bearing? Nothing on the car is original anyway so cutting the brake backing plates to clear the larger bearing does not concern me.

I 'assume' that the extra .275 diameter allows for more & larger diameter ball bearings, and should provide a pretty significant increase in strength?

Comments?

Street car with 275 Nittos, 3.54 ratio & Eaton Truetrac, TKX 5 speed & bmp hemi.

Thanks
Craig

Re: Strange S60 bearing options 2.875 vs 3.150 [Re: Craig J] #3225623
04/07/24 01:12 PM
04/07/24 01:12 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,004
U.S.S.A.
JohnRR Offline
I Win
JohnRR  Offline
I Win

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,004
U.S.S.A.
Are you going to run green type bearings or use the stock tapered bearing ?


running up my post count some more .
Re: Strange S60 bearing options 2.875 vs 3.150 [Re: JohnRR] #3225628
04/07/24 01:37 PM
04/07/24 01:37 PM
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 166
West Palm Beach, Florida
C
Craig J Offline OP
member
Craig J  Offline OP
member
C

Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 166
West Palm Beach, Florida
Originally Posted by JohnRR
Are you going to run green type bearings or use the stock tapered bearing ?


Ball bearing, I am not sure if it is mfg by Green.

Strange Bearing.JPG
Re: Strange S60 bearing options 2.875 vs 3.150 [Re: Craig J] #3225657
04/07/24 04:56 PM
04/07/24 04:56 PM
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,552
Rittman Ohio
fourgearsavoy Offline
I Live Here
fourgearsavoy  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,552
Rittman Ohio
The only other issue might be the bearing retainer bolts might not line up with the housing ends. Does it come with retainers? I don't know why you would need the larger bearing. 40 spline upgrade maybe shruggy

Gus beer


64 Plymouth Savoy
493 Indy EZ's by Nick at Compu-Flow
5-Speed Richmond faceplate Liberty box
Dana 60
Re: Strange S60 bearing options 2.875 vs 3.150 [Re: fourgearsavoy] #3225676
04/07/24 07:47 PM
04/07/24 07:47 PM
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,835
MI, usa
dvw Offline
master
dvw  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,835
MI, usa
If you are reusing your current brakes? The parts won't bolt on with different bolt pattren ends.
Doug

Re: Strange S60 bearing options 2.875 vs 3.150 [Re: Craig J] #3225689
04/07/24 09:31 PM
04/07/24 09:31 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,004
U.S.S.A.
JohnRR Offline
I Win
JohnRR  Offline
I Win

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,004
U.S.S.A.
Originally Posted by Craig J
Originally Posted by JohnRR
Are you going to run green type bearings or use the stock tapered bearing ?


Ball bearing, I am not sure if it is mfg by Green.


Green is a generic term at this point , just run the stock mopar bearing size , as other said , your factory brakes aren't going to fit , if you are going aftermarket rear disc then you have a better chance of getting something like TBM because they don't make parts for the musclecar era mopars that I have been able to find


running up my post count some more .
Re: Strange S60 bearing options 2.875 vs 3.150 [Re: Craig J] #3225696
04/07/24 10:08 PM
04/07/24 10:08 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,023
Oregon
A
AndyF Offline
I Win
AndyF  Offline
I Win
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,023
Oregon
The Torino ends are really nice since they use a big bearing and they are sealed up pretty well but stock drum brakes are not going to bolt on and you might not be able to modify the backing plate to work with the larger housing. I suggest shooting an email to DoctorDiff and seeing what he says. He has more knowledge in this area than most folks.

Re: Strange S60 bearing options 2.875 vs 3.150 [Re: AndyF] #3225711
04/08/24 12:03 AM
04/08/24 12:03 AM
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,857
Pattison Texas
CSK Offline
master
CSK  Offline
master

Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,857
Pattison Texas
Originally Posted by AndyF
The Torino ends are really nice since they use a big bearing and they are sealed up pretty well but stock drum brakes are not going to bolt on and you might not be able to modify the backing plate to work with the larger housing. I suggest shooting an email to DoctorDiff and seeing what he says. He has more knowledge in this area than most folks.


I got the larger bearing ends, Dr Diff said to carefully enlarge the hole in my stock backing plates, works great, lots of miles on it


1968 Charger COLD A/C Hilborn EFI
512ci 9.7 compression, Stealth heads, 4.10 gear A518 ODtrans 4100lb,10.93 full street car trim
2020 T/A 392 Stock 11.79 @ 114.5

Re: Strange S60 bearing options 2.875 vs 3.150 [Re: Craig J] #3225734
04/08/24 08:44 AM
04/08/24 08:44 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,363
Marion, South Carolina [><]
an8sec70cuda Offline
I Live Here
an8sec70cuda  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,363
Marion, South Carolina [><]
You don't need the big ford ends/bearings unless you're going w/ 40 spline axles.


CHIP
'70 hemicuda, 575" Hemi, 727, Dana 60
'69 road runner, 440-6, 18 spline 4 speed, Dana 60
'71 Demon, 340, low gear 904, 8.75
'73 Chrysler New Yorker, 440, 727, 8.75
'90 Chevy 454SS Silverado, 476" BBC, TH400, 14 bolt
'06 GMC 2500HD LBZ Duramax
Re: Strange S60 bearing options 2.875 vs 3.150 [Re: Craig J] #3225789
04/08/24 12:49 PM
04/08/24 12:49 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,157
Bend,OR USA
C
Cab_Burge Offline
I Win
Cab_Burge  Offline
I Win
C

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,157
Bend,OR USA
If you want to use a decent posi unit with 35 spline axles instead of the larger 40 spline race axles and spool I would order the 35 spline axle package work up twocents


Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
Re: Strange S60 bearing options 2.875 vs 3.150 [Re: Cab_Burge] #3225791
04/08/24 12:51 PM
04/08/24 12:51 PM
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 712
Lake Villa Il
INTMD8 Online content
super stock
INTMD8  Online Content
super stock

Joined: May 2019
Posts: 712
Lake Villa Il
That's what I went with. It uses a big ford bearing but still uses the Mopar bolt pattern so brakes were a direct bolt on.


69 Charger. 438ci Gen2 hemi. Flex fuel. Holley HP efi. 650rwhp @7250 510rwtq @5700
Re: Strange S60 bearing options 2.875 vs 3.150 [Re: INTMD8] #3225792
04/08/24 12:55 PM
04/08/24 12:55 PM
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 712
Lake Villa Il
INTMD8 Online content
super stock
INTMD8  Online Content
super stock

Joined: May 2019
Posts: 712
Lake Villa Il


69 Charger. 438ci Gen2 hemi. Flex fuel. Holley HP efi. 650rwhp @7250 510rwtq @5700
Re: Strange S60 bearing options 2.875 vs 3.150 [Re: INTMD8] #3225815
04/08/24 02:00 PM
04/08/24 02:00 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,023
Oregon
A
AndyF Offline
I Win
AndyF  Offline
I Win
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,023
Oregon
Yeah that will work when you use the matching H1147 Mopar housing ends.

Re: Strange S60 bearing options 2.875 vs 3.150 [Re: AndyF] #3225848
04/08/24 04:12 PM
04/08/24 04:12 PM
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 712
Lake Villa Il
INTMD8 Online content
super stock
INTMD8  Online Content
super stock

Joined: May 2019
Posts: 712
Lake Villa Il
Originally Posted by AndyF
Yeah that will work when you use the matching H1147 Mopar housing ends.


Yes I thought those were the ones he was asking about.


69 Charger. 438ci Gen2 hemi. Flex fuel. Holley HP efi. 650rwhp @7250 510rwtq @5700
Re: Strange S60 bearing options 2.875 vs 3.150 [Re: dvw] #3225859
04/08/24 05:41 PM
04/08/24 05:41 PM
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 166
West Palm Beach, Florida
C
Craig J Offline OP
member
Craig J  Offline OP
member
C

Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 166
West Palm Beach, Florida
Originally Posted by dvw
If you are reusing your current brakes? The parts won't bolt on with different bolt pattren ends.
Doug


It seems like Strange made the effort to make the bigger bearing work with the mopar brakes.

strange ends.JPG
Re: Strange S60 bearing options 2.875 vs 3.150 [Re: Craig J] #3226008
04/09/24 11:47 AM
04/09/24 11:47 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,004
U.S.S.A.
JohnRR Offline
I Win
JohnRR  Offline
I Win

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,004
U.S.S.A.
Originally Posted by Craig J
Originally Posted by dvw
If you are reusing your current brakes? The parts won't bolt on with different bolt pattren ends.
Doug


It seems like Strange made the effort to make the bigger bearing work with the mopar brakes.



Did not know that , seems like a no brainer then to go with the bigger bearing


running up my post count some more .






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1