|
Re: Stock Oil pan from 64-66
[Re: cudaman1969]
#3221452
03/19/24 02:39 PM
03/19/24 02:39 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,784 Rio Linda, CA
John_Kunkel
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,784
Rio Linda, CA
|
The '62-'65 B-body engine sits 1 5/8" further forward than the '66-later. This makes the front of later pans interfere with the early K-member.
The INTERNET, the MISinformation superhighway
|
|
|
Re: Stock Oil pan from 64-66
[Re: John_Kunkel]
#3221453
03/19/24 02:54 PM
03/19/24 02:54 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 21,071 Niles , Ohio
therocks
oh wait.but hey.lets see.oh yeah.
|
oh wait.but hey.lets see.oh yeah.
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 21,071
Niles , Ohio
|
I ran a 66 440 in my 65 for like 30 years with a 66 pan that came on the 440 Never a problem.Now the 440 has a 8 qt Moroso pan that is listed 66 up.Fits great I did take a tiny notch from the K frame for more clearance Didndt have to but just made me feel better Oh yeah driven on the street with the 8 qt for 20 years now and never a problem.
Chrysler Firepower
|
|
|
|
|
|