Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
SBM 3.79" crank #3205764
01/17/24 08:49 PM
01/17/24 08:49 PM
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 324
Northport, al.
T
tvt59 Offline OP
enthusiast
tvt59  Offline OP
enthusiast
T

Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 324
Northport, al.
Has anyone done a SBM with a 3.79 crank and 6.50" rods? If so how did you like it?


Nothing worth anything comes easy. It is always harder to do the right thing. My Grandfather
Re: SBM 3.79" crank [Re: tvt59] #3205783
01/17/24 10:34 PM
01/17/24 10:34 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,022
Oregon
A
AndyF Offline
I Win
AndyF  Offline
I Win
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,022
Oregon
That should work okay. We rarely see a SBM engine in the shop anymore. Last one was a 427 with a 4.125 stroke and Chevy 6.200 long rods. It ran great, car went 160 mph.

Re: SBM 3.79" crank [Re: tvt59] #3209089
01/29/24 09:52 PM
01/29/24 09:52 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,138
Melbourne , Australia
LA360 Offline
master
LA360  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,138
Melbourne , Australia
Originally Posted by tvt59
Has anyone done a SBM with a 3.79 crank and 6.50" rods? If so how did you like it?


You have 6.5" rods lying around, or are you getting them made for the engine?

I bought a 360 years ago when I knew much less, it had 6.625" long rods in it. It's not an endeavour I've sought to replicate.

Last edited by LA360; 01/29/24 10:34 PM.

Alan Jones
Re: SBM 3.79" crank [Re: LA360] #3209246
01/30/24 04:31 PM
01/30/24 04:31 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,875
Weddington, N.C.
Streetwize Offline
master
Streetwize  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,875
Weddington, N.C.
Didn't they make the 3.79 so you could use a 360 standard OEM piston and get high compression For a .060 over 360?

Or a .020 over 340 I suppose would work too.

If an OEM 8:1 360 is about .0100 in the hole the math works out to very close to zero deck using the OEM rod.

Or maybe they made it to run a SBC CH piston in the 9.2 deck R block? I'm sure there's a combo that works using an off the shelf slug.

I built a 440" W2 360 (4.25" CRANK) and used an off the shelf SBC chevy 'claimer' Race piston @ ~1.28" CH and the slug was super light, I think my bobweight was right around 1800

Last edited by Streetwize; 01/31/24 05:53 PM.

WIZE

World's Quickest Diahatsu Rocky (??) 414" Stroker Small block Mopar Powered. 10.84 @ 123...and gettin' quicker!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mWzLma3YGI

In Car:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PjXcf95e6v0
Re: SBM 3.79" crank [Re: LA360] #3209623
01/31/24 07:06 PM
01/31/24 07:06 PM
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 324
Northport, al.
T
tvt59 Offline OP
enthusiast
tvt59  Offline OP
enthusiast
T

Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 324
Northport, al.
Molnar has them in stock.


Nothing worth anything comes easy. It is always harder to do the right thing. My Grandfather
Re: SBM 3.79" crank [Re: tvt59] #3209697
02/01/24 01:01 AM
02/01/24 01:01 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,138
Melbourne , Australia
LA360 Offline
master
LA360  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,138
Melbourne , Australia
You've got nothing to lose really. The rods are about 35 grams heavier than a 6.125" rod. With the right piston, you should be able to get something around the 450 grams mark. Put a decent wall thickness wrist pin and modern ring package in it and you'd be good to go.


Alan Jones
Re: SBM 3.79" crank [Re: LA360] #3210360
02/03/24 09:42 PM
02/03/24 09:42 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,989
Anoka County, MN
L
Leigh Offline
master
Leigh  Offline
master
L

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,989
Anoka County, MN
I’ve ran a 4340 LA Enterprise 3.790 crank for many years. It was a MP part#, from the early 1990’s. It was the basis of the 388” R1, 59* 4 bolt block project. Oliver 6.50” rods, Milodon swinging pickup pan. Roller valve train, with Norris rockers. Brodix heads. I’ll probably enter the mortuary before it fails. 🤣 “Dead” reliable.







Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1