Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Aluminum vs. Iron Hemi #3179305
09/29/23 02:36 PM
09/29/23 02:36 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,489
Minnesota
Hemi_Joel Offline OP
master
Hemi_Joel  Offline OP
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,489
Minnesota
Other than weight, which is obvious, what are the pros and cons of an aluminum hemi block versus an iron hemi block for a street/strip style car? Thanks, Joel


[img]http://i.imgur.com/boeexFms.jpg[/img]
31 Plymouth Coupe, 392 Hemi, T56 magnum
RS23J71
RS27J77
RP23J71
RO23J71
WM21J8A
I don't regret the things I've done. I only regret the things I didn't do.
"Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools because they have to say something. ~ Plato"
Re: Aluminum vs. Iron Hemi [Re: Hemi_Joel] #3179331
09/29/23 03:16 PM
09/29/23 03:16 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,157
Bend,OR USA
C
Cab_Burge Offline
I Win
Cab_Burge  Offline
I Win
C

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,157
Bend,OR USA
Ring seal is much better with an iron block, hence Pro Stock still using them.
I know you said for street use but my thinking is that the iron blocks will seal up better than aluminum block with steel sleeves will when being driven at normal running coolant temps. worktwocents

For all the naysayers saying all or most of the new cars come with aluminum blocks look at the new Challengers with the Hi Po motors using iron blocks instead of aluminum.
The new cars blocks were designed for that application, the aftermarket replacement blocks for early American muscle car motors weren't designed to be better than the original iron blocks were. work scope up


Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
Re: Aluminum vs. Iron Hemi [Re: Cab_Burge] #3179335
09/29/23 03:24 PM
09/29/23 03:24 PM
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 712
Lake Villa Il
INTMD8 Offline
super stock
INTMD8  Offline
super stock

Joined: May 2019
Posts: 712
Lake Villa Il
Originally Posted by Cab_Burge
Ring seal is much better with an iron block, hence Pro Stock still using them.


This ^


69 Charger. 438ci Gen2 hemi. Flex fuel. Holley HP efi. 650rwhp @7250 510rwtq @5700
Re: Aluminum vs. Iron Hemi [Re: Hemi_Joel] #3179342
09/29/23 03:43 PM
09/29/23 03:43 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,916
A shed in England
Tig Offline
master
Tig  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,916
A shed in England
General consensus is 3 - 4 % more power in favour of the iron block (upto 40 hp @ 1000hp) due to ring sealing, you will also lose more if you are using some sort of boost. With more modern aluminium blocks it's reputed to be less though. Whats worth more, 30 hp (@ 750hp) or the 150lb weight saving ?
You also have to look at availability, how many iron Mopar blocks are available with a 4.84 bore spacing ?


'74 Challenger..9.46 @ 145.9 1/4, 6.001 @ 118 1/8 so far. 4023lb !!! # N/A, Marsh performance 655ci, Indy Maxx, T/R, Indy 600-13 X's, Street legal, pump gas, full interior, Cal-Tracs, mufflers, 3:73's and real 10.5 radials.
9.51 @ 142.4 1/4, 6.003 @ 114 1/8 with our old mule KB, 572-13, 580 wedge.
RHD '68 Barracuda Fastback 323ci street/strip. Best ET 13.88 @ 99.03
Re: Aluminum vs. Iron Hemi [Re: Hemi_Joel] #3179352
09/29/23 04:09 PM
09/29/23 04:09 PM
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,645
Stuttgart, Arkansas
rickseeman Offline
master
rickseeman  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,645
Stuttgart, Arkansas
Originally Posted by Hemi_Joel
Other than weight, which is obvious, what are the pros and cons of an aluminum hemi block versus an iron hemi block for a street/strip style car? Thanks, Joel

A Keith Black block is sexier than an iron block and only adds $2,000 to the total build price. I like sexy.


2011 Drag Pak Challenger
Re: Aluminum vs. Iron Hemi [Re: rickseeman] #3179356
09/29/23 04:23 PM
09/29/23 04:23 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,489
Minnesota
Hemi_Joel Offline OP
master
Hemi_Joel  Offline OP
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,489
Minnesota
I already have the early Mopar performance mega block iron block sitting here all machined, all it needs is a final hone. Everything is squared up, bore sitting at 4.495, lifter bores bushed. I have some good stage 5 heads that flow 480/300 all ready to go, and a Velasco 4.5 in crank. Mostly I just need rods, pistons, and a cam. So the question is should follow my own advice that I give other people of not using something just because you have it, but use what's best for the situation? And I'm working on trying to figure out what is best for the situation? Hence this question. I emailed Tim banning a week ago to find out what's the availability on the KB blocks and what machining operations have to be done before assembly but I haven't heard back from him yet.
This would be for a naturally aspirated drag week motor.


[img]http://i.imgur.com/boeexFms.jpg[/img]
31 Plymouth Coupe, 392 Hemi, T56 magnum
RS23J71
RS27J77
RP23J71
RO23J71
WM21J8A
I don't regret the things I've done. I only regret the things I didn't do.
"Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools because they have to say something. ~ Plato"
Re: Aluminum vs. Iron Hemi [Re: Cab_Burge] #3179358
09/29/23 04:30 PM
09/29/23 04:30 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,165
Plymouth, MI
Blusmbl Online content
master
Blusmbl  Online Content
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,165
Plymouth, MI
Originally Posted by Cab_Burge
For all the naysayers saying all or most of the new cars come with aluminum blocks look at the new Challengers with the Hi Po motors using iron blocks instead of aluminum.


True, but some counterpoint examples - 13/14 GT500's have an aluminum block, unsleeved, with a plasma bore coating. The newer GT500's have conventional aluminum blocks with sleeves. They are good for 1200+ hp. Lots of LS's making above that as well. It can be done.

Agree the ring seal is a little better on alumimum vs. cast iron, but like Tig said- what's going to help the car more overall? Losing 30 hp from not quite as good ring seal, or losing 150 pounds off the nose of the car? Bench racing, at 2800 pounds and 850-820 hp, the weight savings with 30 less hp would be 0.05 quicker than more power with an iron block.


'18 Ford Raptor, random motorcycles, 1968 Plymouth Fury III - 11.37 @ 118
Re: Aluminum vs. Iron Hemi [Re: Hemi_Joel] #3179361
09/29/23 04:34 PM
09/29/23 04:34 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,916
A shed in England
Tig Offline
master
Tig  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,916
A shed in England
The early M/P mega blocks are thought to be lighter than the later ones. I know we only saved around 70lb when we swapped from a iron block 528 to a KB block 572, many years ago. Used the same top end, the crank and rods would have been heavier on the 572 but I remember expecting a lot more weight savings at the time.


'74 Challenger..9.46 @ 145.9 1/4, 6.001 @ 118 1/8 so far. 4023lb !!! # N/A, Marsh performance 655ci, Indy Maxx, T/R, Indy 600-13 X's, Street legal, pump gas, full interior, Cal-Tracs, mufflers, 3:73's and real 10.5 radials.
9.51 @ 142.4 1/4, 6.003 @ 114 1/8 with our old mule KB, 572-13, 580 wedge.
RHD '68 Barracuda Fastback 323ci street/strip. Best ET 13.88 @ 99.03
Re: Aluminum vs. Iron Hemi [Re: Tig] #3179372
09/29/23 05:14 PM
09/29/23 05:14 PM
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 12,386
Taxes & Virus's R-US, NY
Dragula Offline
I Live Here
Dragula  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: May 2004
Posts: 12,386
Taxes & Virus's R-US, NY
I have had a lot of trouble with the aluminum blocks. I prefer the cast iron ones. Bores can be held tighter, and rounder......Feels like its making more hp, but its heavier.

Besides the sleeves leaking coolant every where,. I think in some of the aluminum blocks there is not enough material behind the sleeves to keep it round during boring and honing. I think if your going to go aluminum, you want nice thick sleeves, and you want nice support behind it. Keep the bores smaller, and put your own sleeves in....

Last edited by Dragula; 09/29/23 05:20 PM.

'70 Cuda,...605 EFI Hemi Street Car (6.20 best pass, 1.33 60ft)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYw6RA-k5Bk (6.25 at 108.75mph from inside car)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3zQEb9uxFng (6.25 at 108mph from outside car)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JCvfzsC4NgM (9.9)

'66 Barracuda AWB Stretched nose Blown 440 Car in build stage

'71 Duster Drag Car 400 Low Deck 512 best 6.002 at 115.44mph
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Znuo3jMUXTk
Re: Aluminum vs. Iron Hemi [Re: Hemi_Joel] #3179373
09/29/23 05:18 PM
09/29/23 05:18 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 17,844
S.E. Michigan
ZIPPY Online content
I Live Here
ZIPPY  Online Content
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 17,844
S.E. Michigan
If the cost isn't a deal breaker and there is no rule against using it, I've never heard of any reasons to not give it a try.

The lighter weight should noticeably improve the car overall....even normal street driving and braking should be better.


Rich H.

Esse Quam Videri




Re: Aluminum vs. Iron Hemi [Re: Hemi_Joel] #3179403
09/29/23 06:58 PM
09/29/23 06:58 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 12,073
Benton, IL.
D
DaveRS23 Offline
Special needs idiot
DaveRS23  Offline
Special needs idiot
D

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 12,073
Benton, IL.
I debated this very issue on my last 540 inch street Hemi build. I have mostly had iron blocks, but have had 1 aluminum Hemi block that was in a Dart and have helped buddies with their aluminum engines.

I went with the iron this time for two simple reasons: First, I have had a few issues getting aluminum to seal. Never had those problems with any iron blocks. Second, I sometimes jump on it before it is fully warmed up. Not a real issue with iron, but could be in certain circumstances with aluminum. For a less experienced builder like myself, the iron was just less likely to cause me an issue.

Then there's the fact that 150lbs or so on the nose is not a big issue for my application.

You guys with more building experience and different uses may not have those issues. But they could have been for me.


Master, again and still
Re: Aluminum vs. Iron Hemi [Re: DaveRS23] #3179408
09/29/23 07:27 PM
09/29/23 07:27 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,489
Minnesota
Hemi_Joel Offline OP
master
Hemi_Joel  Offline OP
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,489
Minnesota
I just weighed my iron mega block. 266 lb. Tim banning said in an email that the KB block weighs approximately 180 lb. So that is an 86 lb saving. Still very significant, but not as dramatic as what has been assumed.


[img]http://i.imgur.com/boeexFms.jpg[/img]
31 Plymouth Coupe, 392 Hemi, T56 magnum
RS23J71
RS27J77
RP23J71
RO23J71
WM21J8A
I don't regret the things I've done. I only regret the things I didn't do.
"Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools because they have to say something. ~ Plato"
Re: Aluminum vs. Iron Hemi [Re: Hemi_Joel] #3179414
09/29/23 07:56 PM
09/29/23 07:56 PM
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,645
Stuttgart, Arkansas
rickseeman Offline
master
rickseeman  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,645
Stuttgart, Arkansas
I have a new 4.995" KB and weighed it and it was 162 lbs.


2011 Drag Pak Challenger
Re: Aluminum vs. Iron Hemi [Re: rickseeman] #3179514
09/30/23 09:24 AM
09/30/23 09:24 AM
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,835
MI, usa
dvw Online content
master
dvw  Online Content
master

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,835
MI, usa
Almost every car that races in the F/X (9.75 and quicker) N/SS or Hemi classes run aluminum blocks. There aren't many that have been 9.0 at my weight. With the exception of Caseys B-1 all are lighter than mine. Granted not everybody's combo is the same. But in my mind $7-$8 K for an aluminum block could be used to a better advantage elsewhere. Especialy when you already own an iron block. My Mega Bock weighs 277lbs.
Doug

Re: Aluminum vs. Iron Hemi [Re: dvw] #3179844
10/01/23 11:35 AM
10/01/23 11:35 AM
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,510
Tulsa, Oklahoma
340Cuda Offline
master
340Cuda  Offline
master

Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,510
Tulsa, Oklahoma
I talked to Total Seal a while back about aluminum blocks.

They said you can seal one up but it is very difficult.

They did not go into the details.

Re: Aluminum vs. Iron Hemi [Re: Hemi_Joel] #3180169
10/02/23 09:00 AM
10/02/23 09:00 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,362
Marion, South Carolina [><]
an8sec70cuda Offline
I Live Here
an8sec70cuda  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,362
Marion, South Carolina [><]
Joel, all I can tell you is that I've been very happy w/ my KB aluminum hemi block. Been running it since 2006. Ball honed it a couple of times during freshen ups and it ran great every time. Didn't put "fresh" bores in it until 2019 when I hurt 3 pistons due to a nitrous mishap.
Comparing to some other similar combos, I don't think mine is really missing any power.
I think the weight loss is worth whatever small amount of power is lost from ring seal. If you don't need the extra weight up front, I'd go aluminum. Unless you completely destroy it, it can be easily repaired.
Now, I think my car could benefit from an iron block simply for the weight up front to help keep the front down.


CHIP
'70 hemicuda, 575" Hemi, 727, Dana 60
'69 road runner, 440-6, 18 spline 4 speed, Dana 60
'71 Demon, 340, low gear 904, 8.75
'73 Chrysler New Yorker, 440, 727, 8.75
'90 Chevy 454SS Silverado, 476" BBC, TH400, 14 bolt
'06 GMC 2500HD LBZ Duramax
Re: Aluminum vs. Iron Hemi [Re: an8sec70cuda] #3180185
10/02/23 09:24 AM
10/02/23 09:24 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,996
Frostbitefalls MN (Rocky&Bullw...
gregsdart Offline
master
gregsdart  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,996
Frostbitefalls MN (Rocky&Bullw...
The lash will open up more as it warms. But for a street combo, where tractoon is poor, the extra weight off the front end is golden. You can't recover that with the extra power of iron. Every last ounce of weight moved aft will help. I really noticed this when i changed weight distribution on my race car. I have enough driveway to do a test hit, and moving weight forward for the track absolutely killed traction on a non prepped surface, despite 15x33 slicks.


8..603 156 mph best, 2905 lbs 549, indy 572-13, alky






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1