|
Re: Interesting 540 dyno test
[Re: INTMD8]
#3169867
08/23/23 10:18 AM
08/23/23 10:18 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 22,696 Bitopia
jcc
If you can't dazzle em with diamonds..
|
If you can't dazzle em with diamonds..
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 22,696
Bitopia
|
I haven't read any questions to how stable fuel pressure is during a run. Did I miss something?
Reality check, that half the population is smarter then 50% of the people and it's a constantly contested fact.
|
|
|
Re: Interesting 540 dyno test
[Re: INTMD8]
#3169961
08/23/23 06:38 PM
08/23/23 06:38 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,036 Oregon
AndyF
OP
I Win
|
OP
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,036
Oregon
|
Did you try more valve spring? Or lighter springs/retainers. (smaller OD, titanium)
I've yet to see a loss of valve control come down to the lifter itself. JMO
Customer isn't interested in spending more money to pick up a few hundred RPM. The engine makes 740 hp at 6000 RPM which is more then he needs on the street anyway. If he decided to go racing he can switch to a solid roller.
|
|
|
Re: Interesting 540 dyno test
[Re: AndyF]
#3170108
08/24/23 10:52 AM
08/24/23 10:52 AM
|
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 712 Lake Villa Il
INTMD8
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 712
Lake Villa Il
|
Fair enough but certainly no need to switch to solid roller to run past 6k (or 7k).
69 Charger. 438ci Gen2 hemi. Flex fuel. Holley HP efi. 650rwhp @7250 510rwtq @5700
|
|
|
|
|
|