Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: Interesting 540 dyno test [Re: INTMD8] #3169867
08/23/23 10:18 AM
08/23/23 10:18 AM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 22,696
Bitopia
J
jcc Offline
If you can't dazzle em with diamonds..
jcc  Offline
If you can't dazzle em with diamonds..
J

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 22,696
Bitopia
I haven't read any questions to how stable fuel pressure is during a run.
Did I miss something?


Reality check, that half the population is smarter then 50% of the people and it's a constantly contested fact.
Re: Interesting 540 dyno test [Re: INTMD8] #3169961
08/23/23 06:38 PM
08/23/23 06:38 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,036
Oregon
A
AndyF Offline OP
I Win
AndyF  Offline OP
I Win
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,036
Oregon
Originally Posted by INTMD8
Did you try more valve spring? Or lighter springs/retainers. (smaller OD, titanium)

I've yet to see a loss of valve control come down to the lifter itself. JMO



Customer isn't interested in spending more money to pick up a few hundred RPM. The engine makes 740 hp at 6000 RPM which is more then he needs on the street anyway. If he decided to go racing he can switch to a solid roller.

Re: Interesting 540 dyno test [Re: AndyF] #3170108
08/24/23 10:52 AM
08/24/23 10:52 AM
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 712
Lake Villa Il
INTMD8 Offline
super stock
INTMD8  Offline
super stock

Joined: May 2019
Posts: 712
Lake Villa Il
Fair enough but certainly no need to switch to solid roller to run past 6k (or 7k).


69 Charger. 438ci Gen2 hemi. Flex fuel. Holley HP efi. 650rwhp @7250 510rwtq @5700
Re: Interesting 540 dyno test [Re: INTMD8] #3172448
09/02/23 08:41 PM
09/02/23 08:41 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,180
Detroit, MI
CokeBottleKid Offline
master
CokeBottleKid  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,180
Detroit, MI
I mean... that thing looks like an ancient holley pro-jection system? What old warehouse did you guys unearth it from? :P. Also if it's a true EFI manifold running a carb on it is going to cause fuel distribution issues as they're not designed for it. Would explain your low RPM roughness

Re: Interesting 540 dyno test [Re: CokeBottleKid] #3172454
09/02/23 08:58 PM
09/02/23 08:58 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,036
Oregon
A
AndyF Offline OP
I Win
AndyF  Offline OP
I Win
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,036
Oregon
It is the Holley MPFI kit for BB Chevy engines. It was recently discontinued so not on their website anymore. The intake manifold was an EFI version of their Strip Dominator. I'm not a fan of this kit but it is what the customer bought and brought to us to use. In the end it made decent power and worked fairly well at WOT but always ran rough at fast idle. We'll see how it works in the car. Not much we can do to fix it since I think the problem is inherent in the intake manifold and/or the fuel rail design. Could be why Holley discontinued the product.

Re: Interesting 540 dyno test [Re: AndyF] #3172814
09/04/23 01:08 PM
09/04/23 01:08 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,180
Detroit, MI
CokeBottleKid Offline
master
CokeBottleKid  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,180
Detroit, MI
Ah so it runs rough with the EFI on as well? Probably worth a look in the cal to see what the injector timing is and also spark advance...

Page 2 of 2 1 2






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1