Scale question
#3144267
05/12/23 09:31 PM
05/12/23 09:31 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,835 MI, usa
dvw
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,835
MI, usa
|
I bought a set of Intercomp scales used. Level everything. even put slide turn plates under the front tires so they don't bind. Zero the scales. I stand on each scale, 200+/-1. So here's what I can't figure out. I weigh the car w/o driver, 3161. Then I get in the car with my suit and helmet, 3345. Raise the car rezero everything. Lower the car down on scales, bounce it, 3307 w/suited driver. The left rear is now light. other 3 read the same. Disconnected the front shocks to check for bind, no difference. the rear (ladder bar) doesn't appear to be bound up either.Even had my wife bounce the car with me in it. Readings returned to the same incorrect readingsafter it settled. so either the LR scale is goofy. something is bound up in the suspension. However it drives snd leaves perfect. The only thing I can think of is to build a platform and roll it onto the scales. Doug
|
|
|
Re: Scale question
[Re: dvw]
#3144269
05/12/23 09:41 PM
05/12/23 09:41 PM
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,821 South Bend
John Brown
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,821
South Bend
|
Move the LR scale to a different position?
July 19th should be "Drive Like Rockford Day". R.I.P. Jimmie.
|
|
|
Re: Scale question
[Re: dvw]
#3144302
05/13/23 05:53 AM
05/13/23 05:53 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,916 A shed in England
Tig
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,916
A shed in England
|
Temperature ? This can effect the load cells on the scales, Did they come out of a cold garage into bright sunlight and the car weight was checked first when the pads were cold ? It could also be a bad connection on that pad, you could try swapping the pads / leads around as mentioned, to see if the problem follows the lead or the pad. I don't think there is suspension bind, the total weight would not alter it would just be in a different place. The difference is just over 1% error, well within the specs of most corner scales it's just odd it's on one scale in particular
'74 Challenger..9.46 @ 145.9 1/4, 6.001 @ 118 1/8 so far. 4023lb !!! # N/A, Marsh performance 655ci, Indy Maxx, T/R, Indy 600-13 X's, Street legal, pump gas, full interior, Cal-Tracs, mufflers, 3:73's and real 10.5 radials. 9.51 @ 142.4 1/4, 6.003 @ 114 1/8 with our old mule KB, 572-13, 580 wedge. RHD '68 Barracuda Fastback 323ci street/strip. Best ET 13.88 @ 99.03
|
|
|
Re: Scale question
[Re: Tig]
#3144313
05/13/23 07:21 AM
05/13/23 07:21 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,835 MI, usa
dvw
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,835
MI, usa
|
I wa careful to level them the best I could. Set up a tripod in the center. Put a laser level on it. Leveled the laser. Then rotated it towards each scale. Measured down from the laser line to the scale itself. Yhen shimmed the scales to the same height with-in about 1/8". Temp about 65 degrees in the garage, no sun shining on them. I will try swapping the scale and cables. Along with double checking connections. Cant get back on it until monday. It does have preload. But on the scales it changes between around 50lbs to about 85lbs, Doug
Last edited by dvw; 05/13/23 07:24 AM.
|
|
|
Re: Scale question
[Re: DoubleD]
#3145287
05/18/23 10:22 AM
05/18/23 10:22 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,835 MI, usa
dvw
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,835
MI, usa
|
The rear preload is perfect. It goes dead staright riding the wheelie bars past the 60ft clocks if you allow it to do that. The only extra weight is the brackets for holding ballast. They weigh 10lbs. I can pull them, the pass seat (21lbs), and run 3 less gallons of fuel (20lbs). So if needed to run index it can lose 50lbs. Here's the strange thing. this is an old weigh slip from different scales 10 years ago. The front weights are similar. The rear is not. It now has the weight brackets +10, Holley carbs +7, tubes in the slicks +8, and cast Dana cover +6, fuel then vs now, +30,, I'm heavier +10, no suit or helmet, +8. sSo it should be +79Lbs. But now it only has one battery now though the 16v is heavier -29lbs. New wheels -30lbs. Carbon hood and scoop -19lbs so -78. So pretty darn close though the distribution is probably more nose heavy. Along with preload changes. I'm going to go out and swap cable and scale location and see what happens. Doug
Last edited by dvw; 05/18/23 10:23 AM.
|
|
|
Re: Scale question
[Re: dvw]
#3145301
05/18/23 11:52 AM
05/18/23 11:52 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,498 PA
moparacer
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,498
PA
|
DVW I don't think you should be raising the car and setting it back down on the scales.
I always have rolled it off bounce it and roll it back on. Has to be in the same spot too to repeat.
Front steering geometry is what is making the weights wonky when you pick it up and set it back down I bet.
Last edited by moparacer; 05/18/23 11:53 AM.
67 Barracuda street/bracket car 11.27-119 68 Dart 502 BB 8.70s-152 414 cid SB Dragster 7.65-174
|
|
|
Re: Scale question
[Re: DoubleD]
#3145338
05/18/23 01:59 PM
05/18/23 01:59 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,835 MI, usa
dvw
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,835
MI, usa
|
This is the results; I put each scale on the floor and zerod them. Then stood on each scale. all 4 read the same 201. When i was using the hoist it had alignment turn plates on the front scales. So when it was set done the tires could slide ourward and find their center. Additionally it was bounced front, rear, side to side. The last test was to roll the car back with the scales on the floor using 2"x10"s to roll it off. Was a litlle tough to get it back up as the scales are taller than the 2"x10"'s. Additional the garage dor is ptched towards the door. Using th elaser level this time the scales were all level side to side, but the rear scales were 3/4" lower than the fronts. Ther was no 3/4" material handy so I went with it as is. As you can see the results are very similar. Doug
Last edited by dvw; 05/18/23 02:02 PM.
|
|
|
Re: Scale question
[Re: dvw]
#3145360
05/18/23 03:49 PM
05/18/23 03:49 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,249 fredericksburg,va
cudaman1969
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,249
fredericksburg,va
|
You have to take one bolt off the back of ladder bars, top bottom no matter. You can’t get the car balanced right without doing that, all four corners have to move, I would do all the shocks too.
Last edited by cudaman1969; 05/18/23 03:50 PM.
|
|
|
Re: Scale question
[Re: cudaman1969]
#3145379
05/18/23 06:24 PM
05/18/23 06:24 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,835 MI, usa
dvw
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,835
MI, usa
|
Thy You have to take one bolt off the back of ladder bars, top bottom no matter. You can’t get the car balanced right without doing that, all four corners have to move, I would do all the shocks too. I did pull the front shocks on case there was an issue. Didn't think there would be since they just came back from Afco. Removing the ladder bar bolt would remove all preload. I wanted to know how much it had just for reference. It'll never make a pass with the bars neutral. So what it scales with no preload really doesnt give me any info. It launches straight and level. Doug
Last edited by dvw; 05/18/23 06:27 PM.
|
|
|
Re: Scale question
[Re: dvw]
#3145389
05/18/23 07:22 PM
05/18/23 07:22 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,249 fredericksburg,va
cudaman1969
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,249
fredericksburg,va
|
Thy You have to take one bolt off the back of ladder bars, top bottom no matter. You can’t get the car balanced right without doing that, all four corners have to move, I would do all the shocks too. I did pull the front shocks on case there was an issue. Didn't think there would be since they just came back from Afco. Removing the ladder bar bolt would remove all preload. I wanted to know how much it had just for reference. It'll never make a pass with the bars neutral. So what it scales with no preload really doesnt give me any info. It launches straight and level. Doug That discrepancy is caused by the bind in the ladders bars. To get any kind of reference of how much weight is on each wheel bolt has to be out. Weight jacks corner to corner, diagonally. Put 80 pounds on right rear hook up bolt and go racing. Ladder bars are the same as rear attached to frame no amount of jacking will change anything in the back unless the whole frame flexes. Your weight has to be in the chair to set up properly, like it will be raced. Tried and true procedures
|
|
|
Re: Scale question
[Re: cudaman1969]
#3145400
05/18/23 08:11 PM
05/18/23 08:11 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,498 PA
moparacer
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,498
PA
|
When i was using the hoist it had alignment turn plates on the front scales. So when it was set done the tires could slide ourward and find their center. Ah I see. I don't have plates so I have to roll it on and off. Its all just for reference anyway. If the car is launching straight the weights are right.
67 Barracuda street/bracket car 11.27-119 68 Dart 502 BB 8.70s-152 414 cid SB Dragster 7.65-174
|
|
|
Re: Scale question
[Re: cudaman1969]
#3145432
05/18/23 09:33 PM
05/18/23 09:33 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,835 MI, usa
dvw
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,835
MI, usa
|
[quote=dvw]Thy[quote=cudaman1969] That discrepancy is caused by the bind in the ladders bars. To get any kind of reference of how much weight is on each wheel bolt has to be out. Weight jacks corner to corner, diagonally. Put 80 pounds on right rear hook up bolt and go racing. Ladder bars are the same as rear attached to frame no amount of jacking will change anything in the back unless the whole frame flexes. Your weight has to be in the chair to set up properly, like it will be raced. Tried and true procedures Maybe I haven't been clear. Post #1; The results were inaccurate. I used the laser incorectly. No slip plates.The pictures in post #8 are; Pic #1 car without driver Pic #2 with me, suit, helmet as raced sitting at the line. These weights were taken after post #1 in which the results were incorrect. The 2nd time around weights were taken with slip plates for the front wheels. Scales leveled with in 1/16" all the way around. The car was lowered from the hoist. Then jounced front, back, and side to side. Post #13 This compares the readings taken when lowering the car using the hoist vs rolling the car onto the scales. As you can see the results are within a few lbs. This may be due to the fact that the rear scales were 3/4" low using this method. Yes I could've removed the ladder bar bolt and removed the pre load. And if the front torsion bars could be loaded equally. Then, yes I understand that would give a true weight distribution without bias. Moving the torsion bar with the driver in the seat to level the car induces preload itself. And trust me that preload disappears with the front wheels in the air. I don't understand put 80'bs on the right rear? Add 80lbs ballast? Add preload until the previous right rear reading is 80lbs heavier? Why 80lbs? What if one car has more left to right bias to start with. Or one driver is 150lbs and another is 350lbs? I can't see how one set amount of weight fits all applications. When I built my car the prevailing theory was to add a few flats of preload. Then add or subtract preload until the car went straight. This is how it's been for 10 years. Only a flat or so change ever. And that was when the rear shocks and springs were upgraded. Since I'll be setting up a new car simiilar to mine, I was curious on my weights. Figured to start out with his with the same rear weight bias as mine and go from there. Doug
Last edited by dvw; 05/18/23 09:35 PM.
|
|
|
Re: Scale question
[Re: dvw]
#3145459
05/18/23 11:50 PM
05/18/23 11:50 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,249 fredericksburg,va
cudaman1969
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,249
fredericksburg,va
|
[quote=dvw]Thy[quote=cudaman1969] That discrepancy is caused by the bind in the ladders bars. To get any kind of reference of how much weight is on each wheel bolt has to be out. Weight jacks corner to corner, diagonally. Put 80 pounds on right rear hook up bolt and go racing. Ladder bars are the same as rear attached to frame no amount of jacking will change anything in the back unless the whole frame flexes. Your weight has to be in the chair to set up properly, like it will be raced. Tried and true procedures Maybe I haven't been clear. Post #1; The results were inaccurate. I used the laser incorectly. No slip plates.The pictures in post #8 are; Pic #1 car without driver Pic #2 with me, suit, helmet as raced sitting at the line. These weights were taken after post #1 in which the results were incorrect. The 2nd time around weights were taken with slip plates for the front wheels. Scales leveled with in 1/16" all the way around. The car was lowered from the hoist. Then jounced front, back, and side to side. Post #13 This compares the readings taken when lowering the car using the hoist vs rolling the car onto the scales. As you can see the results are within a few lbs. This may be due to the fact that the rear scales were 3/4" low using this method. Yes I could've removed the ladder bar bolt and removed the pre load. And if the front torsion bars could be loaded equally. Then, yes I understand that would give a true weight distribution without bias. Moving the torsion bar with the driver in the seat to level the car induces preload itself. And trust me that preload disappears with the front wheels in the air. I don't understand put 80'bs on the right rear? Add 80lbs ballast? Add preload until the previous right rear reading is 80lbs heavier? Why 80lbs? What if one car has more left to right bias to start with. Or one driver is 150lbs and another is 350lbs? I can't see how one set amount of weight fits all applications. When I built my car the prevailing theory was to add a few flats of preload. Then add or subtract preload until the car went straight. This is how it's been for 10 years. Only a flat or so change ever. And that was when the rear shocks and springs were upgraded. Since I'll be setting up a new car simiilar to mine, I was curious on my weights. Figured to start out with his with the same rear weight bias as mine and go from there. Doug Ok
|
|
|
|
|