Re: Vibration problem
[Re: J Brough]
#3118843
02/04/23 11:58 AM
02/04/23 11:58 AM
|
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 6,707 nowhere
Sniper
master
|
master
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 6,707
nowhere
|
I assumed that it was there to balance the converter, You are correct. If it were externally balanced then, in addition to that side weight you have, there would be a larger imbalance weight on the face of the converter.
|
|
|
Re: Vibration problem
[Re: J Brough]
#3118871
02/04/23 01:40 PM
02/04/23 01:40 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 18,444 UPPER MICHIGAN, MARQUETTE COUN...
NITROUSN
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 18,444
UPPER MICHIGAN, MARQUETTE COUN...
|
Before replacing the converter, I removed the engine oil pan to inspect the bottom end. When the engine was balanced, the replacement pistons were lighter than stock, so material was removed from the crank. My thoughts are something wrong in the balancing. It was most likely always there from the start up. You have done just about everything else possible. Was this the original engine and crankshaft to the car?
|
|
|
Re: Vibration problem
[Re: NITROUSN]
#3119010
02/05/23 08:10 AM
02/05/23 08:10 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 55 Md.
J Brough
OP
member
|
OP
member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 55
Md.
|
I also am starting to think that the problem has been there since the start and I just did not notice it. It is the matching numbers 383 block. It is the crankshaft that was in the engine and I believe it is original, although when we tore it down for the rebuild a few years ago, it was obvious that it had been gone through before, so anything is possible. It is a forged crankshaft stock stroke for a 383. The shop that did the machine work for me balanced the rotating assembly. They had to take material out of the counterweights to get it to balance with the lighter pistons that I used. I did not get any data with the balance job, just a note on the bill that it was balanced. The shop is very respected and reliable, so it is hard to believe that the balance is off, but mistakes do happen.
At the beginning of the search for the source of my problem I did a RPM drop test for each cylinder by pulling each plug wire one by one. Cylinders #3 and #5 did not drop as much as the others. They were not dead, just a bit less. IIRC they were about 80 RPM and the others were around 100 RPM. I'm going to repeat this test and verify the previous results. Also going to try again to verify that the vibration is not the result of a misfire. I did pull and inspect all the plugs and did not notice anything that would suggest a misfire, but will do that again. The vibration does not feel like a misfire at least based on my experience. I don't feel or see the vibration in the engine like I do in the steering wheel and through the seats.
Yesterday I found an issue with the left motor mount insulator that I thought might be the problem. The stud on the aftermarket insulator was too long and the end of it was gouging slightly into the block. The right side had clearance. I found an original insulator in my parts stash that was in OK shape and also the rubber seemed much softer, so I put that in place to see if it made any difference. There was no noticeable change in the vibration.
Thanks again to everyone that has provided their thoughts and experience to help me figure out this problem.
Regards,
John
|
|
|
Re: Vibration problem
[Re: J Brough]
#3119046
02/05/23 10:57 AM
02/05/23 10:57 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,760 Jefferson State
srt
ESYC
|
ESYC
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,760
Jefferson State
|
......... The shop is very respected and reliable, so it is hard to believe that the balance is off, but mistakes do happen...... Have you brought the car to the shop? A quick demonstration of the vibration might get some address by them. I'd expect a properly balanced rotating assembly should not be the source. Do you have a magnet oil drain plug, or have cut open an oil filter to see if there is any obvious bearing or other metal showing up?
|
|
|
Re: Vibration problem
[Re: J Brough]
#3119830
02/08/23 12:20 AM
02/08/23 12:20 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,620 Highland, MI.
Sunroofcuda
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,620
Highland, MI.
|
Wow - amazed this has not been figgered-out yet!
For entertainment sake, here's an old true Mopar story my old business partner told me about many years ago - I was in business with him from 1984-1992. A buddy of his bought a NEW 1967 Charger with a 440 in it back in the day. From day 1, the car had a strange vibration coming from somewhere. The car was back to the dealer numerous times - they replaced: the wheels, the tires, the driveshaft & U-joints, the fan, etc. They COULD NOT get the vibration figured-out. Last resort before buying the car back, was to schedule a meeting with the factory rep from Chrysler. So the day comes & my old partner & his buddy - the car owner show-up to the dealer. The factory guy is there & he says "let's take it out for a ride." The Chrysler dude is driving & they finally jump on the highway - he mats the gas pedal until the motor blows. He says: "looks like we found the problem!" The car gets a new 440 & problem was solved. True story............
No Man With A Good Car Needs To Be Justified
|
|
|
Re: Vibration problem
[Re: Sunroofcuda]
#3119851
02/08/23 06:15 AM
02/08/23 06:15 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 55 Md.
J Brough
OP
member
|
OP
member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 55
Md.
|
That solution has crossed my mind.
I replaced both motor mounts with old used ones. One has a MOPAR number the other is an old aftermarket I believe. The rubber in them seemed much more pliable than the rubber in the new mounts. Anyway, no change in vibration. I removed the transmission mount to take another very close look at it. It looks like what it is, a brand new rubber mount. When I bought the mount, the metal U-shaped bracket that holds the insert was made from much thinner metal and looked flimsy. I removed the rubber insert with its steel shell and installed it in my original bracket. The original mount rubber was junk. So, I don't have an original trans mount to try.
I ran the engine with the trans mount removed, and the vibration was pretty much gone. Possibly completely gone. I had the car in the air on my lift with the trans supported on an under lift stand, so I had to use a ladder to get in the car and start it. I did not run it very long since my garage door was closed. I also did not get under the car while it was running to see if I could see/feel any vibration in the transmission. I may repeat this test with some additional help, but not sure what more I could learn from that. I think I've learned that the vibration is being transmitted from the engine/trans through the trans mount into the body. I suspected that was the case, since I could feel the vibration in the seat and steering wheel ( and see it in the steering wheel) but could not feel it anywhere under the hood.
I'm thinking I'll pull the valve covers first and do some inspecting of the valve train to make sure all is well there. Then maybe the intake and valley pan to get a good look at the cam and lifters. Could a bad lifter, bent push rod, bad rocker, or even a cam that is going south on a cylinder cause an imbalance in the engine firing that transmits through the mounts to the body? It is a stock flat tappet hydraulic cam with the original pushrods and rockers.
R/ John
|
|
|
Re: Vibration problem
[Re: J Brough]
#3119914
02/08/23 11:32 AM
02/08/23 11:32 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,338 Omaha Ne
TJP
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,338
Omaha Ne
|
That solution has crossed my mind.
I replaced both motor mounts with old used ones. One has a MOPAR number the other is an old aftermarket I believe. The rubber in them seemed much more pliable than the rubber in the new mounts. Anyway, no change in vibration. I removed the transmission mount to take another very close look at it. It looks like what it is, a brand new rubber mount. When I bought the mount, the metal U-shaped bracket that holds the insert was made from much thinner metal and looked flimsy. I removed the rubber insert with its steel shell and installed it in my original bracket. The original mount rubber was junk. So, I don't have an original trans mount to try.
I ran the engine with the trans mount removed, and the vibration was pretty much gone. Possibly completely gone. I had the car in the air on my lift with the trans supported on an under lift stand, so I had to use a ladder to get in the car and start it. I did not run it very long since my garage door was closed. I also did not get under the car while it was running to see if I could see/feel any vibration in the transmission. I may repeat this test with some additional help, but not sure what more I could learn from that. I think I've learned that the vibration is being transmitted from the engine/trans through the trans mount into the body. I suspected that was the case, since I could feel the vibration in the seat and steering wheel ( and see it in the steering wheel) but could not feel it anywhere under the hood.
I'm thinking I'll pull the valve covers first and do some inspecting of the valve train to make sure all is well there. Then maybe the intake and valley pan to get a good look at the cam and lifters. Could a bad lifter, bent push rod, bad rocker, or even a cam that is going south on a cylinder cause an imbalance in the engine firing that transmits through the mounts to the body? It is a stock flat tappet hydraulic cam with the original pushrods and rockers.
R/ John A vacuum gauge will quickly answer if you have an issue in the last bolded paragraph. A cheap often overlloked diagnostic ? tuning tool that everyone should have Myself I would repeat the test on the lift with additional help. Might be able to buy rent or borrow exhaust hose or find something else that will take the heat HOSE LINKY That will help tremendously with the exhaust fumes. I started out with with a kit $$, a door port and a cheap exhaust fan (for green houses?) Worked well until the fan gave it up. So I bought a Dayton Commercial unit that i set outside, hook the hoses up and I can run a car for quite some time. Great for heating the shop up if it's cold LOL 🥶☃🥶 I think pursuing your path MAY expose the issue. Do make sure the trans is at the same height as with the CM in place. one can then raise or lower it a bit, Keep us posted data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/39f9f/39f9fc9825eff66b6b310bb1a6c31a6cc2ecaade" alt="popcorn popcorn"
|
|
|
Re: Vibration problem
[Re: TJP]
#3119986
02/08/23 01:59 PM
02/08/23 01:59 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 20,811 north of coder
moparx
Buying your homeless and unwanted bolt on battery terminals
|
Buying your homeless and unwanted bolt on battery terminals
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 20,811
north of coder
|
glad to hear about the transmission mount investigation. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cf836/cf83654fe9147572a42b73e8888b4f3f3590f5a2" alt="up up" do you suppose the mount you had there was a tick too short, causing the transmission to hit the crossmember, or was it just the bad rubber it was made of ? have you tried to space the mount away from the transmission ? i forget. is this mount a spool type or the earlier block type ? data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5213/f52136b329cf105a3a818f56cd05f2183afb9f05" alt="beer beer"
|
|
|
Re: Vibration problem
[Re: J Brough]
#3120087
02/08/23 08:22 PM
02/08/23 08:22 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,061 Freeport IL USA
poorboy
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,061
Freeport IL USA
|
That solution has crossed my mind.
I replaced both motor mounts with old used ones. One has a MOPAR number the other is an old aftermarket I believe. The rubber in them seemed much more pliable than the rubber in the new mounts. Anyway, no change in vibration. I removed the transmission mount to take another very close look at it. It looks like what it is, a brand new rubber mount. When I bought the mount, the metal U-shaped bracket that holds the insert was made from much thinner metal and looked flimsy. I removed the rubber insert with its steel shell and installed it in my original bracket. The original mount rubber was junk. So, I don't have an original trans mount to try.
I ran the engine with the trans mount removed, and the vibration was pretty much gone. Possibly completely gone. I had the car in the air on my lift with the trans supported on an under lift stand, so I had to use a ladder to get in the car and start it. I did not run it very long since my garage door was closed. I also did not get under the car while it was running to see if I could see/feel any vibration in the transmission. I may repeat this test with some additional help, but not sure what more I could learn from that. I think I've learned that the vibration is being transmitted from the engine/trans through the trans mount into the body. I suspected that was the case, since I could feel the vibration in the seat and steering wheel ( and see it in the steering wheel) but could not feel it anywhere under the hood.
I'm thinking I'll pull the valve covers first and do some inspecting of the valve train to make sure all is well there. Then maybe the intake and valley pan to get a good look at the cam and lifters. Could a bad lifter, bent push rod, bad rocker, or even a cam that is going south on a cylinder cause an imbalance in the engine firing that transmits through the mounts to the body? It is a stock flat tappet hydraulic cam with the original pushrods and rockers.
R/ John Unless you do this exact same test with only the trans mount installed being different, it really means nothing. You can't compare results of a test between a car on a lift with the transmission mount removed to a car on the ground with the transmission mount bolted in place. The very concept of putting the car on the lift compared to it not being on a lift just doesn't work, lots of stuff is different between those two comparisons. Unless some serious measuring was done between the position of the tail shaft of trans on a lift stand, and careful measurements of the trans mounted on the mount, your results could be inaccurate. If the differences between the tail shaft height with out the mount and with the mount are only 1/8" different, the entire problem could be as simple as a driveshaft u joint angle bind, or a bind between the two motor mounts and the trans mount. With the trans supported on a stand, its free to move side to side and up and down as much, or as little as it pleases, and only eliminates the fact that securing the trans stops the vibration, it doesn't put the blame anywhere. You could put the mount back in, with the bolts slightly loose and retest to see if the vibration is gone or still present. If its gone, then I would tighten the bolts to the trans and test, then tighten the bolts to the mount and test, then maybe change the order in which the bolts are tightened, and see if one or the other solves (or at least helps) the vibration. If the vibration is still present with the bolts loose, you may want to add shims (washers) to lift the trans above the mount.to see what that might do.
|
|
|
|
|