Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
A body Questions #3085088
10/11/22 11:55 AM
10/11/22 11:55 AM
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,157
Cruising!
Q
QuickDodge Offline OP
super stock
QuickDodge  Offline OP
super stock
Q

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,157
Cruising!
I just got around to reading the August 2022 issue of Mopar Action magazine. (Yea, I'm a bit slow!) In one of the articles, written by Richard Ehrenberg, it is mentioned that the Mopar A body was the only car ever certified to run on the NASCAR superspeedways without a roll cage. (that statement is on page 66) After doing some internet research, it appears the NASCAR compact race series was a 1960 and 1961 only deal.

The early 60's A bodies looked considerably different than the later A bodies. Visual differences aside, were all of the A bodies the same structurally? How did the strength of the later A bodies compare to the 1960 and 61 models?

Re: A body Questions [Re: QuickDodge] #3085140
10/11/22 02:32 PM
10/11/22 02:32 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,200
Bend,OR USA
C
Cab_Burge Offline
I Win
Cab_Burge  Offline
I Win
C

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,200
Bend,OR USA
Those were the first unibody cars that Chrysler made, that ended in 1962 when they switch the B bodies to unibody construction: down: No more full frame b bodies after that: whiney:


Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
Re: A body Questions [Re: Cab_Burge] #3085144
10/11/22 02:47 PM
10/11/22 02:47 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 20,793
A collage of whims
topside Offline
Too Many Posts
topside  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 20,793
A collage of whims
Without looking up "Plymouth Valiant" on Wikipedia or looking at Mymopar, etc, as I recall the 60-62 A-body cars had unique structural stampings; obviously the bodies were unique.
Mom had a '60 Valiant that I drove daily, and a girlfriend had a 64 Valiant, and though they drove & handled similarly, I don't think much was the same.
The Slant 6, maybe some mechanical & suspension items, and maybe some electrical stuff likely transferred.
The 1st-gens dominated that NASCAR series, and IIRC Mopar advertised the '63 (2nd-gen) as being all-new and tested for a million miles.
I've enjoyed driving every generation of A-body.

Re: A body Questions [Re: topside] #3085276
10/11/22 10:46 PM
10/11/22 10:46 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,570
Freeport IL USA
poorboy Offline
I Live Here
poorboy  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,570
Freeport IL USA
The 61 & 62 A body may have had a slightly better construction, but I suspect the difference was more likely NASCAR's safety requirements changed a lot between the late 50s and the early 60s, and has been growing more concerned about driver safety ever since.
Early auto racing was a deadly sport. It was because of all those early deaths the rules began to place more concern on the wrecks being more driver survivable. Better built cars, and better race track safety were required to keep racing, and new rules forced those changes.

Re: A body Questions [Re: poorboy] #3085452
10/12/22 01:52 PM
10/12/22 01:52 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 20,179
Park Forest, IL
slantzilla Offline
Too Many Posts
slantzilla  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 20,179
Park Forest, IL
Since Chrysler was the only company that really took the sub compact series seriously, I would guess no roll bar was more a negotiated point than anything.


"Everybody funny, now you funny too."






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1