Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Re: 60 ft issues [Re: fast68plymouth] #3077462
09/15/22 10:47 AM
09/15/22 10:47 AM
Joined: Dec 2021
Posts: 1,127
Loudoun County, VA
Brad_Haak Offline
super stock
Brad_Haak  Offline
super stock

Joined: Dec 2021
Posts: 1,127
Loudoun County, VA
Originally Posted by fast68plymouth
Quote

Proform 11.14 @ 119.7
Holley 10.88 @ 123.7


This is a huge difference imo.
Especially when you factor in the slower carb had a better 60’ time.

Yeah, that's a HUGE difference for a basic carb swap like that... 4 MPH?! confused

Is there something out of kilter w/ the Proform that hasn't been noticed?


2021 Challenger 6.4L Scat Pack 1320
100% stock: 1.680, 11.894 at 113.75 (DA 175 ft)
weight reduction, wheels, tires, Hellcat air box: 1.661, 11.686 at 115.97 (DA 710 ft)

1973 Challenger 452 ci street/strip [2008]
pump gas, DOT radials: 1.454, 10.523 at 126.44 (DA 514 ft)
Re: 60 ft issues [Re: an8sec70cuda] #3077522
09/15/22 01:29 PM
09/15/22 01:29 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,363
Las Vegas
Al_Alguire Offline
I Live Here
Al_Alguire  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,363
Las Vegas
IMO a few things i see in the OK video. First is converter converter converter...Your converter is not helping anything for sure I woudl go looser for sure there. Also I would work on "freeing" up the cars front end as well. Would also work getting the larger carb to work better, not a bug fan of the Holley"1000", I would consider a different option there(4500). IMO with what you have there I think it could benefit from more.


"I am not ashamed to confess I am ignorant of what I do not know."

"It's never wrong to do the right thing"
Re: 60 ft issues [Re: Al_Alguire] #3077650
09/15/22 08:47 PM
09/15/22 08:47 PM
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 3,187
Md.
C
carnut68 Offline OP
master
carnut68  Offline OP
master
C

Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 3,187
Md.
Originally Posted by Al_Alguire
IMO a few things i see in the OK video. First is converter converter converter...Your converter is not helping anything for sure I woudl go looser for sure there. Also I would work on "freeing" up the cars front end as well. Would also work getting the larger carb to work better, not a bug fan of the Holley"1000", I would consider a different option there(4500). IMO with what you have there I think it could benefit from more.
I have a Dominator coming already have a Super Victor 4500. I'll lower the front and make sure the shocks are full loose. Converter will have to wait till after race season is over. I'm sure ATI can loosen it some.
What effect does loosing the valve lash have? Other than lose some lift.
The 950 was basically out of the box with the exception of moving IFR down and T slot restricters. Blue cam on the primary. It was jetted 10 sizes smaller than the 1000.


America First!
Re: 60 ft issues [Re: carnut68] #3077692
09/15/22 10:32 PM
09/15/22 10:32 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,185
Bend,OR USA
C
Cab_Burge Offline
I Win
Cab_Burge  Offline
I Win
C

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,185
Bend,OR USA
Loosening the lash makes the cam smaller in duration and lift, just the opposite of tightening them up scope


Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
Re: 60 ft issues [Re: carnut68] #3082122
10/01/22 05:56 AM
10/01/22 05:56 AM
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 3,187
Md.
C
carnut68 Offline OP
master
carnut68  Offline OP
master
C

Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 3,187
Md.
Just an update. Went to a test n tune Friday. Got my 60 down into 1.47-1.48 from 1.54 -1.56. Lowered the front by an inch and softened the rear shocks a couple clicks. I put a new dominator on it from Dominic it worked great. Ran my best et of 10.66 twice. Jetted carb on last pass best 60 of 1.47 by the time slip it looked like 10.59 -60 pass, but dropped a valve. I have a bigger hammer with a smallish roller on the stand waiting.


America First!
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1