Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
BarretJackson buy back #3032467
04/10/22 09:24 PM
04/10/22 09:24 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,998
North Pole,New York
F
formula_s Offline OP
master
formula_s  Offline OP
master
F

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,998
North Pole,New York
Is sales tax owed on a buy back at these auctions. Does anyone think this car might be a buyback yesterday at 72K. The new owner didn't look very happy when the hammer dropped.

https://www.barrett-jackson.com/Events/Event/Details/1966-DODGE-HEMI-CORONET-257095

Re: BarretJackson buy back [Re: formula_s] #3032472
04/10/22 09:29 PM
04/10/22 09:29 PM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 21,825
Kirkland, Washington
Pacnorthcuda Offline
Too Many Posts
Pacnorthcuda  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 21,825
Kirkland, Washington
[s][/s]
No sales tax because there really is no sale, the term is just to enforce that you are on the hook for auction fees.

Re: BarretJackson buy back [Re: Pacnorthcuda] #3032692
04/11/22 06:29 PM
04/11/22 06:29 PM
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 544
boston mass-moving to long isl...
M
massdaytona Offline
mopar
massdaytona  Offline
mopar
M

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 544
boston mass-moving to long isl...
Originally Posted by Pacnorthcuda
[s][/s]
No sales tax because there really is no sale, the term is just to enforce that you are on the hook for auction fees.


correct me if i am wrong, but i thought when u con sign a vehicle at BJ, u no longer r the owner, so if u re-buy the car, no sales tax is due??? - i dunno

Re: BarretJackson buy back [Re: massdaytona] #3032696
04/11/22 06:38 PM
04/11/22 06:38 PM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 21,825
Kirkland, Washington
Pacnorthcuda Offline
Too Many Posts
Pacnorthcuda  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 21,825
Kirkland, Washington
Originally Posted by massdaytona
Originally Posted by Pacnorthcuda
[s][/s]
No sales tax because there really is no sale, the term is just to enforce that you are on the hook for auction fees.


correct me if i am wrong, but i thought when u con sign a vehicle at BJ, u no longer r the owner, so if u re-buy the car, no sales tax is due??? - i dunno


Well BJ is not going to get involved with the states sales tax laws, but since the title isn’t going to transfer to any new owner, no sales tax would be involved.

Re: BarretJackson buy back [Re: massdaytona] #3032697
04/11/22 06:40 PM
04/11/22 06:40 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 20,786
A collage of whims
topside Offline
Too Many Posts
topside  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 20,786
A collage of whims
Thought it was sold at no reserve.
B-J site shows Sold @ $79,200, which I presume includes the buyer's premium.
I'd bet Craig has a work-around so he's not paying out anything...
IIRC, if the seller buys back, he still pays whatever fees B-J can assign to the deal.
Good question on sales tax, I frankly don't know.
I would think if he hasn't been paid, then there's technically no actual sale.

Re: BarretJackson buy back [Re: formula_s] #3032740
04/11/22 08:20 PM
04/11/22 08:20 PM
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 12,234
Looking for a way out of Middl...
IMGTX Offline
I Live Here
IMGTX  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 12,234
Looking for a way out of Middl...
Interesting question.

I guess it depends on how the law looks at the transaction(s).

The feds would say that you are responsible for the profit you made during the deal but is this one deal or two? When I transfer ownership to BJ is that the end of one deal and when I have to "Buy it back" is that a second deal?

An important thing to consider s that it is against federal law for you or your agent to bid on items that you own and are being auctioned. It's called Shill Bidding. The whole purpose of you signing ownership to Barret Jackson is so you can legally bid on it since you do not own it anymore. The fact you get a taste of the profits for Barret Jackson selling THEIR car that YOU USED TO OWN smacks of Shill bidding but apparently isn't considered such or somebody would have pressed charges for it by now. Imagine how you would feel when you offer $50,000 for a car and end up in a two person bidding frenzy and end up paying 100K for that car, only to find out the other person was going to profit off you paying more for the car.

So I figure that

Scenario #1 If I sell a car to an "Other guy" and he titles it and declares he paid $X then I am on the hook for the sales tax. At that point I no longer own the car. If I buy it back and re-title it in my name the "Other Guy" he is on the hook for sales tax also, and I own the car again. We both pay sales tax.

Scenario #2 If I sell a car to an "Other guy" and he returns it to me for a different price, but the title isn't transferred then I could try to squeak by without paying taxes because I never stopped owning the car. (I bet the state/feds would say differently)

Now replace the other guy in the above 2 scenario's with Barret Jackson.

Scenario #1 Sales tax is paid twice.
Scenario #2 Is shill bidding because I own the car I am bidding on.

My guess is that you pay sales tax on when you sell it to Barrett Jackson and they pay sales tax when they sell it to you on the auction block, and then you pay income tax on the amount of profit you made on the whole deal. I'm sure BJ's fees more than cover them paying sales tax and cut into your money accordingly.

Still I am not only speculating.


Re: BarretJackson buy back [Re: IMGTX] #3032765
04/11/22 10:40 PM
04/11/22 10:40 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,563
Freeport IL USA
poorboy Offline
I Live Here
poorboy  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,563
Freeport IL USA

Originally Posted by IMGTX
Interesting question.

I guess it depends on how the law looks at the transaction(s).

The feds would say that you are responsible for the profit you made during the deal but is this one deal or two? When I transfer ownership to BJ is that the end of one deal and when I have to "Buy it back" is that a second deal?

An important thing to consider s that it is against federal law for you or your agent to bid on items that you own and are being auctioned. It's called Shill Bidding. The whole purpose of you signing ownership to Barret Jackson is so you can legally bid on it since you do not own it anymore. The fact you get a taste of the profits for Barret Jackson selling THEIR car that YOU USED TO OWN smacks of Shill bidding but apparently isn't considered such or somebody would have pressed charges for it by now. Imagine how you would feel when you offer $50,000 for a car and end up in a two person bidding frenzy and end up paying 100K for that car, only to find out the other person was going to profit off you paying more for the car.

So I figure that

Scenario #1 If I sell a car to an "Other guy" and he titles it and declares he paid $X then I am on the hook for the sales tax. At that point I no longer own the car. If I buy it back and re-title it in my name the "Other Guy" he is on the hook for sales tax also, and I own the car again. We both pay sales tax.

Scenario #2 If I sell a car to an "Other guy" and he returns it to me for a different price, but the title isn't transferred then I could try to squeak by without paying taxes because I never stopped owning the car. (I bet the state/feds would say differently)

Now replace the other guy in the above 2 scenario's with Barret Jackson.

Scenario #1 Sales tax is paid twice.
Scenario #2 Is shill bidding because I own the car I am bidding on.

My guess is that you pay sales tax on when you sell it to Barrett Jackson and they pay sales tax when they sell it to you on the auction block, and then you pay income tax on the amount of profit you made on the whole deal. I'm sure BJ's fees more than cover them paying sales tax and cut into your money accordingly.

Still I am not only speculating.



Except, the buyer is the one that pays the sales tax, not the seller.

I suspect that Barret Jackson isn't buying your car, they are probably selling it for you under an iron clad set of co-selling terms. You sign the title and hand it to them, they sell your car for the pre described fees. They pay no sales tax, you sell for no reserve, you have no recourse. the new buyer gets your signed title.
You bid and buy based on a buyer's number, that may, or my not be in your name. If you are the winning bid, you get to pay Barret Jacksons buyer fees and sales tax based on the final bid. Since you only signed the title, it really never left your name until the new owner was the highest bidder, since that was you, the title itself never left your name, but you will also get to pay the seller's fees. You pay the sellers fees, the buyer's fees, and probably sales tax just to keep your car.
The guy was probably unhappy because he was shilling up the price and the price went higher then the real buyer wanted to pay, or maybe the buyer figured out he was bidding against the car owner and wanted to teach him an expensive lesson.

Re: BarretJackson buy back [Re: poorboy] #3032820
04/12/22 09:08 AM
04/12/22 09:08 AM
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,872
Ontario, Canada
S
Stanton Online content
Don't question me!
Stanton  Online Content
Don't question me!
S

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,872
Ontario, Canada
Quote
Thought it was sold at no reserve.


There is never a "reserve" at BJ. If the seller is not satisfied with a bid they have to bid it up themselves and it may come down to them basically buying the car back. At this point they pay the "seller fees" to BJ but no sales tax since there is no transfer of ownership. BJ would eventually pay tax on the "revenue".

Re: BarretJackson buy back [Re: Stanton] #3032915
04/12/22 02:38 PM
04/12/22 02:38 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,148
Canada -- Posts: 4034 -Registe...
5
5thAve Offline
Doesn't care what this says anyway
5thAve  Offline
Doesn't care what this says anyway
5

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,148
Canada -- Posts: 4034 -Registe...
BJ's policy says " All lots are sold subject to State of Arizona and County sales tax unless a resale number is provided during registration."

So it probably comes down to BJs policies. You wouldn't think they would charge tax if you're buying it from yourself but they might look at it that a sale is a sale.

Re: BarretJackson buy back [Re: 5thAve] #3032932
04/12/22 03:35 PM
04/12/22 03:35 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,270
fredericksburg,va
C
cudaman1969 Offline
master
cudaman1969  Offline
master
C

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,270
fredericksburg,va
So when you give the signed title to BJ they give you no money? Who pays the BJ fees if it sells to someone other than original owner? How much % would the original owner get from sale? Does the owner have a claimed value in case it sells for way less? (no profit, no fed tax)

Re: BarretJackson buy back [Re: cudaman1969] #3033167
04/13/22 01:59 PM
04/13/22 01:59 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,148
Canada -- Posts: 4034 -Registe...
5
5thAve Offline
Doesn't care what this says anyway
5thAve  Offline
Doesn't care what this says anyway
5

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,148
Canada -- Posts: 4034 -Registe...
Originally Posted by cudaman1969
So when you give the signed title to BJ they give you no money? Who pays the BJ fees if it sells to someone other than original owner? How much % would the original owner get from sale? Does the owner have a claimed value in case it sells for way less? (no profit, no fed tax)


If it's like a normal auction they don't give you and money and the original owner would get whatever the car sold for minus whatever the sellers fee is. If it sells for less then they expected that's the risk they took.

Re: BarretJackson buy back [Re: poorboy] #3033313
04/13/22 07:17 PM
04/13/22 07:17 PM
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 12,234
Looking for a way out of Middl...
IMGTX Offline
I Live Here
IMGTX  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 12,234
Looking for a way out of Middl...
Originally Posted by poorboy


Except, the buyer is the one that pays the sales tax, not the seller.




Thank you for the correction. I did get that wrong. up







Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1