Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Roll Cage NHRA Legality Question #2985913
11/16/21 08:52 PM
11/16/21 08:52 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,023
Sac, CA
M
mopowers Offline OP
master
mopowers  Offline OP
master
M

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,023
Sac, CA
I found photos of this car online (not mine), but have several questions.

Would this cage be NHRA legal if it didn't have the two long rear braces and only had the two X'd rear braces? Or would they need to be straight back and not crossed?

Also, is there a requirement for a minimum angle that two rear braces must be at?

I've look through the rule book, but the section on rear braces for full bodied cars is a bit confusing

cage.jpgcage 2.JPGcage 3.JPG
Re: Roll Cage NHRA Legality Question [Re: mopowers] #2985917
11/16/21 09:01 PM
11/16/21 09:01 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,023
Sac, CA
M
mopowers Offline OP
master
mopowers  Offline OP
master
M

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,023
Sac, CA
Stupid me! I found the answer to one of my questions:

cage 4.JPG
Re: Roll Cage NHRA Legality Question [Re: mopowers] #2985927
11/16/21 09:20 PM
11/16/21 09:20 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 23,558
Here
J
jcc Online content
No soup for you!!!
jcc  Online Content
No soup for you!!!
J

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 23,558
Here
Not sure what is going on with OP's pictured incomplete cage.


I'm with Helmuth Hübener, and no soup is being served today.
Re: Roll Cage NHRA Legality Question [Re: jcc] #2985934
11/16/21 09:35 PM
11/16/21 09:35 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,023
Sac, CA
M
mopowers Offline OP
master
mopowers  Offline OP
master
M

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,023
Sac, CA
Originally Posted by jcc
Not sure what is going on with OP's pictured incomplete cage.


Disregard the rest of the cage in the photo - it's obviously under construction. I was asking specifically about the rear braces and that was the closest photo I could find to illustrate my question. Maybe I was unclear. Can rear braces be crossed (like the X-brace in the top photo), or do they have to be straight back? That's what I was getting at. I apologize for any the confusion.

Last edited by mopowers; 11/16/21 10:04 PM.
Re: Roll Cage NHRA Legality Question [Re: mopowers] #2985952
11/16/21 10:32 PM
11/16/21 10:32 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,921
Bend,OR USA
C
Cab_Burge Offline
I Win
Cab_Burge  Offline
I Win
C

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,921
Bend,OR USA
Call or E mail NHRA tech to get the straight, accurate scoop, information scope twocents


Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
Re: Roll Cage NHRA Legality Question [Re: Cab_Burge] #2986041
11/17/21 10:38 AM
11/17/21 10:38 AM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,833
fredericksburg,va
C
cudaman1969 Offline
Itch Nutz
cudaman1969  Offline
Itch Nutz
C

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,833
fredericksburg,va
Your question is answered in the bar size part, A-two bars @1-5/8 CM any length just like the picture. If it has to have an X then the picture NEEDS changing

Last edited by cudaman1969; 11/17/21 10:40 AM.
Re: Roll Cage NHRA Legality Question [Re: cudaman1969] #2986079
11/17/21 12:34 PM
11/17/21 12:34 PM
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 12,608
Fulton County, PA
C
CMcAllister Offline
Mr. Helpful
CMcAllister  Offline
Mr. Helpful
C

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 12,608
Fulton County, PA
Concerning the rear bars in the photo...

IF they are both 1.625 x .120 and IF they are in on the correct plates, then either the straight bars going to the back OR the X brace, as long as it exceeds 30 degrees, would satisfy the "B" bars in the cert by themselves. An inspector would only be concerned with the bars needed to satisfy the cert.

ETA...per the rule book, additional "B" bars allow you to use smaller tubing and still satisfy the cert. i.e., in the photo the four rear bars could be 1.375 diameter. Or the long bars could be 1.250, IF the X is 1.625.

The "B" bars can be straight or Xd, But by Xing the short bars, rather than having them in individually and straight back, you are gaining a lot more strength and rigidity with no increase in weight or "stuff" in the car.

Welding the long bars to the body structure at the base of the rear window will tie those bars to the body at that point, using one to support the other and further stiffening the body.

Don't forget the "D" bars. Main hoop to frame tie. A second pair at that point on the main hoop being used to support the area of the floor at the front spring box will also be beneficial, especially if using leaf springs.

Last edited by CMcAllister; 11/17/21 03:00 PM.

If the results don't match the theory, change the theory.
Re: Roll Cage NHRA Legality Question [Re: CMcAllister] #2986158
11/17/21 05:16 PM
11/17/21 05:16 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,023
Sac, CA
M
mopowers Offline OP
master
mopowers  Offline OP
master
M

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,023
Sac, CA
Thanks guys. I appreciate the input I knew I shouldn't have posted that photo I found online. It's just confusing the general question I had.

I did send an email to NHRA and heard back. Excellent suggestion btw, Cab. I had no idea NHRA answered emails. Per that email response and as mentioned, If there's only two rear bars, they may be X'd, but they said the two bars must attach to the horizontal portion of the main hoop. Does anyone know where in the rulebook that is stated? I'm failing to find it.

In my 66 Dart, have four bars currently, similar to the four in the top photo. Two long 1.25" bars to the rear of the trunk (attached to the horizontal part of the main hoop), and two 1.625" X'd tubes from the outer radii of the main hoop to the side of the inner wheel tub (>30 degrees). I was just curious if I could cut out the long 1.25" bars and still be legal. Sounds like no because the two X'd bars are tied to the radius and not the horizontal portion of the main hoop.

Re: Roll Cage NHRA Legality Question [Re: mopowers] #2986170
11/17/21 05:45 PM
11/17/21 05:45 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,921
Bend,OR USA
C
Cab_Burge Offline
I Win
Cab_Burge  Offline
I Win
C

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,921
Bend,OR USA
NHRA uses SFI specs. so you need to look at them to get it straight scope up wrench up
Nothing like getting the run around, huh rant


Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
Re: Roll Cage NHRA Legality Question [Re: mopowers] #2986191
11/17/21 06:34 PM
11/17/21 06:34 PM
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 12,608
Fulton County, PA
C
CMcAllister Offline
Mr. Helpful
CMcAllister  Offline
Mr. Helpful
C

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 12,608
Fulton County, PA
Originally Posted by mopowers
Thanks guys. I appreciate the input I knew I shouldn't have posted that photo I found online. It's just confusing the general question I had.

I did send an email to NHRA and heard back. Excellent suggestion btw, Cab. I had no idea NHRA answered emails. Per that email response and as mentioned, If there's only two rear bars, they may be X'd, but they said the two bars must attach to the horizontal portion of the main hoop. Does anyone know where in the rulebook that is stated? I'm failing to find it.

In my 66 Dart, have four bars currently, similar to the four in the top photo. Two long 1.25" bars to the rear of the trunk (attached to the horizontal part of the main hoop), and two 1.625" X'd tubes from the outer radii of the main hoop to the side of the inner wheel tub (>30 degrees). I was just curious if I could cut out the long 1.25" bars and still be legal. Sounds like no because the two X'd bars are tied to the radius and not the horizontal portion of the main hoop.


It's on the screenshot of the rulebook page above. We've always put the bars out near or partially in the radius.. I believe rule of thumb is it needs to be within 5" of the top of the cage. Not way down in or below the radius. Bars in the photo are right there. A picky inspector might say something about that.

If your X is 1.625, the 1.25 bars going to the trunk won't matter one way or the other. Inspector will ignore those. Why cut them out? They aren't useless.

SFI spec kicks in quicker than 8.50 and/or 180MPH. Slower than that is rulebook specs.


If the results don't match the theory, change the theory.
Re: Roll Cage NHRA Legality Question [Re: CMcAllister] #2986212
11/17/21 07:47 PM
11/17/21 07:47 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,023
Sac, CA
M
mopowers Offline OP
master
mopowers  Offline OP
master
M

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,023
Sac, CA
Originally Posted by CMcAllister
Originally Posted by mopowers
Thanks guys. I appreciate the input I knew I shouldn't have posted that photo I found online. It's just confusing the general question I had.

I did send an email to NHRA and heard back. Excellent suggestion btw, Cab. I had no idea NHRA answered emails. Per that email response and as mentioned, If there's only two rear bars, they may be X'd, but they said the two bars must attach to the horizontal portion of the main hoop. Does anyone know where in the rulebook that is stated? I'm failing to find it.

In my 66 Dart, have four bars currently, similar to the four in the top photo. Two long 1.25" bars to the rear of the trunk (attached to the horizontal part of the main hoop), and two 1.625" X'd tubes from the outer radii of the main hoop to the side of the inner wheel tub (>30 degrees). I was just curious if I could cut out the long 1.25" bars and still be legal. Sounds like no because the two X'd bars are tied to the radius and not the horizontal portion of the main hoop.


It's on the screenshot of the rulebook page above. We've always put the bars out near or partially in the radius.. I believe rule of thumb is it needs to be within 5" of the top of the cage. Not way down in or below the radius. Bars in the photo are right there. A picky inspector might say something about that.

If your X is 1.625, the 1.25 bars going to the trunk won't matter one way or the other. Inspector will ignore those. Why cut them out? They aren't useless.

SFI spec kicks in quicker than 8.50 and/or 180MPH. Slower than that is rulebook specs.


I'm not seeing where it's explicitly stated in the rulebook, which prompted my question. It says "If A (meaning 1.626"), two bars." It doesn't say they should attach to to the horizontal portion of the main hoop, though, it's probably implied by what is shown in the rulebook picture, as cudaman1969 said above. I just wish it was more clear because the photo also shows two parallel rear bars, yet the NHRA tech said X'd is fine if they're attached to the horizontal portion of the main hoop.

For me, I'm considering removing the two long 1.25" bars because I've changed direction a tad on my build. I may just redo the rear braces all together by using bent rear braces, so I can run a rear seat.

I appreciate the input. This has been very helpful.

Re: Roll Cage NHRA Legality Question [Re: mopowers] #2986226
11/17/21 08:22 PM
11/17/21 08:22 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,833
fredericksburg,va
C
cudaman1969 Offline
Itch Nutz
cudaman1969  Offline
Itch Nutz
C

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,833
fredericksburg,va
Awhile back I had an inspection from the NHRA guy and he had to ponder my back bars, had an X off the top hoop down to shock support bar (1-5/8 dom tube) I then had two 1-1/4 bars half way down on the X bars back to where it held the aluminum plate that the body was attached (fiberglass 70 Cuda funny car body) he was thinking they had to be 1-5/8 also. I said they didn’t have anything to do with the cage just a support for body, after much thinking he agreed. He later said if I’d put CM in there he’d have given me a 25C cert because of the way i’d put it together. Like said it’s at their digression, to an extent, of what they will pass.

Re: Roll Cage NHRA Legality Question [Re: mopowers] #2986355
11/18/21 09:53 AM
11/18/21 09:53 AM
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,219
New York
polyspheric Offline
master
polyspheric  Offline
master

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,219
New York
Where can I read up on the engineering used to make these rules?

[/sarc]


Boffin Emeritus
Re: Roll Cage NHRA Legality Question [Re: polyspheric] #2986495
11/18/21 04:57 PM
11/18/21 04:57 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 23,558
Here
J
jcc Online content
No soup for you!!!
jcc  Online Content
No soup for you!!!
J

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 23,558
Here
Originally Posted by polyspheric
Where can I read up on the engineering used to make these rules?

[/sarc]


That reminds me of a disagreement I had with a city electrical inspector about grounding when I presented the current at the time NEC code book, he said "I don't care what the NEC code book says", authored and revised many times for nearly a century by hundreds of engineers and Phd's in the field. eyes


I'm with Helmuth Hübener, and no soup is being served today.
Re: Roll Cage NHRA Legality Question [Re: jcc] #2986511
11/18/21 05:40 PM
11/18/21 05:40 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,921
Bend,OR USA
C
Cab_Burge Offline
I Win
Cab_Burge  Offline
I Win
C

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,921
Bend,OR USA
Typical low level government bureaucrat inspector tsk
You do need to remember that some local government agency have their own set of rules on utility, especially if they also own and operate that utility shruggy
I've had to argue with some of those local city inspectors who thought they had authority over the telephone industry in a small town in SO CA back in the early 1980, once his boss told him they did not have the legal authority over governing the telephone wiring inside or outside the new home being constructed he shut his yap hammer devil stirthepot haha


Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1