Re: 7.1 h beam strength?
[Re: JACK1440]
#2878388
01/22/21 02:11 PM
01/22/21 02:11 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 201 Texas
Chief
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 201
Texas
|
Just for information. I just broke a K1 rod in my 500 inch 8.71 engine. Big end of the rod was still attached to the crank, the section from about 2 inches up to the pin was lodged between the cam and the lifter galley, which broke two lifter bores out of the block. Also took out 2 sleeves. One piston and pin were in the oil pan and I don't think there were any pieces bigger than a quarter left. Car was on it's best pass to date and it let go about 550 ft into the run. The rods had been in the engine for 8 years so I think I found the limit. 1300 + HP.
My replacement engine until I get the block repaired will be my 572 with B1 heads, and 7.1 Oliver rods. Only complaint with the rods are the rod bolts are proprietary to Oliver. NOT Cheap. They are ARP and you can buy them through Summit and Jegs but they are Oliver design. I'm thinking MGP when blower motor goes back.
Dave
Last edited by Chief; 01/22/21 02:11 PM.
Dave Covey
|
|
|
Re: 7.1 h beam strength?
[Re: Chief]
#2878391
01/22/21 02:15 PM
01/22/21 02:15 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,852 Bend,OR USA
Cab_Burge
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,852
Bend,OR USA
|
Just for information. I just broke a K1 rod in my 500 inch 8.71 engine. Big end of the rod was still attached to the crank, the section from about 2 inches up to the pin was lodged between the cam and the lifter galley, which broke two lifter bores out of the block. Also took out 2 sleeves. One piston and pin were in the oil pan and I don't think there were any pieces bigger than a quarter left. Car was on it's best pass to date and it let go about 550 ft into the run. The rods had been in the engine for 8 years so I think I found the limit. 1300 + HP.
My replacement engine until I get the block repaired will be my 572 with B1 heads, and 7.1 Oliver rods. Only complaint with the rods are the rod bolts are proprietary to Oliver. NOT Cheap. They are ARP and you can buy them through Summit and Jegs but they are Oliver design. I'm thinking MGP when blower motor goes back.
Dave Molnars ARP 2000 bolts are different also and you can NOT buy them directly from ARP Does MGP make and steel steel rods or aluminum only?
Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
|
|
|
Re: 7.1 h beam strength?
[Re: Chief]
#2878437
01/22/21 03:24 PM
01/22/21 03:24 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,197 Michigan
A727Tflite
master
|
master
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,197
Michigan
|
Just for information. I just broke a K1 rod in my 500 inch 8.71 engine. Big end of the rod was still attached to the crank, the section from about 2 inches up to the pin was lodged between the cam and the lifter galley, which broke two lifter bores out of the block. Also took out 2 sleeves. One piston and pin were in the oil pan and I don't think there were any pieces bigger than a quarter left. Car was on it's best pass to date and it let go about 550 ft into the run. The rods had been in the engine for 8 years so I think I found the limit. 1300 + HP.
My replacement engine until I get the block repaired will be my 572 with B1 heads, and 7.1 Oliver rods. Only complaint with the rods are the rod bolts are proprietary to Oliver. NOT Cheap. They are ARP and you can buy them through Summit and Jegs but they are Oliver design. I'm thinking MGP when blower motor goes back.
Dave Would be interesting to have the other rods checked for length and to have them x-rayed to see if any others were ready to exit stage left.
|
|
|
Re: 7.1 h beam strength?
[Re: Cab_Burge]
#2878441
01/22/21 03:34 PM
01/22/21 03:34 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 201 Texas
Chief
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 201
Texas
|
Molnars ARP 2000 bolts are different also and you can NOT buy them directly from ARP Does MGP make and steel steel rods or aluminum only? I didn't know that about the Molnar rod bolts. MGP only makes aluminum rods that I'm aware of. I'm going aluminum because I may have reached the limit of a steel rod with a blower. I haven't had an issue with detonation is the reason I used the steel rod. And, other than Oliver I don't know of any other manufacturer who's rods will handle up to 2000 HP. I'm sure there are some however. I really haven't researched a steel rod under power adder conditions that much, at the time I got the Oliver's I was running NA. I don't like the idea of changing out the rods often, but...... Not to mention it's hard to get a intelligent answer on how many runs I can reasonably expect. I'm told 50-1000 by different people Dave .
Dave Covey
|
|
|
Re: 7.1 h beam strength?
[Re: A727Tflite]
#2878447
01/22/21 03:40 PM
01/22/21 03:40 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 201 Texas
Chief
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 201
Texas
|
[quote=Transman Would be interesting to have the other rods checked for length and to have them x-rayed to see if any others were ready to exit stage left. [/quote] Pay shipping and I'll send the leftovers to you cause the rest of them will never see the inside of one of my engines again. I have no complaints about them really, other than the expense of getting the block repaired. This is the first time I have ever had a rod break, other than one broke at the wrist pin that was caused by having a rod converted from press fit to floating. (machine shop had over heated them during previous swap) Dave
Dave Covey
|
|
|
Re: 7.1 h beam strength?
[Re: Chief]
#2878504
01/22/21 04:59 PM
01/22/21 04:59 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,197 Michigan
A727Tflite
master
|
master
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,197
Michigan
|
[quote=Transman
Would be interesting to have the other rods checked for length and to have them x-rayed to see if any others were ready to exit stage left. Pay shipping and I'll send the leftovers to you cause the rest of them will never see the inside of one of my engines again. I have no complaints about them really, other than the expense of getting the block repaired. This is the first time I have ever had a rod break, other than one broke at the wrist pin that was caused by having a rod converted from press fit to floating. (machine shop had over heated them during previous swap) Dave [/quote] I wouldn’t use them either. Without exact measurements when they were new, checking them now would obviously be a waste. As for x-ray, only as a learning tool at this point. I can hear them hitting the garbage can from here.
|
|
|
Re: 7.1 h beam strength?
[Re: gregsdart]
#2878534
01/22/21 06:01 PM
01/22/21 06:01 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,219 New York
polyspheric
master
|
master
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,219
New York
|
What about "I" beam vs. "H" beam? The tensile strength (pulled apart) is relative to the beam's cross-sectional area in inches. Either one may be heavier there. No, they don't publish that. However, in nitrous, boosted applications where cylinder pressure greatly exceeds NA, the shape with the most effective use of material is the "H": the sides add bending resistance in compression to the rod's cross-plane axis (90 degrees to the crank, where it is free to pivot). The piston keeps it straight in the crank axis.
What else don't they do? Run rods on big electric motors to destruction: spin it at high RPM with a piston. Add RPM, weight, then both to establish relationships: "rod X failed at 8,790 RPM with a 560 gram piston, but at 7,120 with a 770 gram piston" etc. I can't think of a way to incorporate the thrust vector (from the rod-to-stroke ratio angle) into this, but some polymath will. Why not? 1. SEMA will boycott you 2. HRM etc. will link you to terrorism 2. your magazine/web site has 10 rod dealer ads, after the test you'll have 1
Boffin Emeritus
|
|
|
Re: 7.1 h beam strength?
[Re: Chief]
#2878537
01/22/21 06:09 PM
01/22/21 06:09 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,912 Pattison Texas
CSK
master
|
master
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,912
Pattison Texas
|
Just for information. I just broke a K1 rod in my 500 inch 8.71 engine. Big end of the rod was still attached to the crank, the section from about 2 inches up to the pin was lodged between the cam and the lifter galley, which broke two lifter bores out of the block. Also took out 2 sleeves. One piston and pin were in the oil pan and I don't think there were any pieces bigger than a quarter left. Car was on it's best pass to date and it let go about 550 ft into the run. The rods had been in the engine for 8 years so I think I found the limit. 1300 + HP.
My replacement engine until I get the block repaired will be my 572 with B1 heads, and 7.1 Oliver rods. Only complaint with the rods are the rod bolts are proprietary to Oliver. NOT Cheap. They are ARP and you can buy them through Summit and Jegs but they are Oliver design. I'm thinking MGP when blower motor goes back.
Dave Did that rod bearing spin, or the wrist pin seize ?
1968 Charger COLD A/C Hilborn EFI 512ci 9.7 compression, Stealth heads, 4.10 gear A518 ODtrans 4100lb,10.93 full street car trim 2020 T/A 392 Stock 11.79 @ 114.5
|
|
|
Re: 7.1 h beam strength?
[Re: B1MAXX]
#2878566
01/22/21 07:15 PM
01/22/21 07:15 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,777 fredericksburg,va
cudaman1969
Itch Nutz
|
Itch Nutz
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,777
fredericksburg,va
|
I’m really leaning to billet also, 7.1 Hussy rods for my 572.. on the street, and they clear everything with a 4.5 crank. I also have K1s but they look to skinny in the beam. Both are 2.20 bottoms and .990 top. Might never see 6500, yea right! Still need 4.53 Hemi pistons though, hint hint
Last edited by cudaman1969; 01/23/21 12:30 PM.
|
|
|
Re: 7.1 h beam strength?
[Re: gregsdart]
#2878834
01/23/21 11:59 AM
01/23/21 11:59 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,219 New York
polyspheric
master
|
master
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,219
New York
|
"Billet": advertising term, actual meaning "cheaper than a forging". It's what to do if you only need a small volume.
Boffin Emeritus
|
|
|
Re: 7.1 h beam strength?
[Re: CSK]
#2878840
01/23/21 12:14 PM
01/23/21 12:14 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 201 Texas
Chief
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 201
Texas
|
Did that rod bearing spin, or the wrist pin seize ?
Bearing still looked good. Pin was in a million pieces. Nothing left of the piston and pin to analyze. Dave
Dave Covey
|
|
|
Re: 7.1 h beam strength?
[Re: polyspheric]
#2878850
01/23/21 12:32 PM
01/23/21 12:32 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,777 fredericksburg,va
cudaman1969
Itch Nutz
|
Itch Nutz
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,777
fredericksburg,va
|
"Billet": advertising term, actual meaning "cheaper than a forging". It's what to do if you only need a small volume. I only need 8
|
|
|
Re: 7.1 h beam strength?
[Re: cudaman1969]
#2878973
01/23/21 03:33 PM
01/23/21 03:33 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 201 Texas
Chief
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 201
Texas
|
Some good info for Aluminum Rods.. Ignor the magazine but read the articleI would like to have some confidence on when the aluminum rod "must" be changed. I don't normally pull the engine down every season unless I must or I'm changing something. For instance because I broke at the end of the season and It's going to be mid season before I can get the blower motor back in, I'm going to put my 572 in the car. To run mid 4.60's I hope, I am replacing the rear gear (3.90-4.30), shorter(Big Bubba to Little Bubba)changing converter from the blower converter. Otherwise the car would have got a new set of tires. I guess instead of aluminum rods I could just go with a set of killer steel one's. It's a dilemma.. Dave
Dave Covey
|
|
|
Re: 7.1 h beam strength?
[Re: gregsdart]
#2879269
01/24/21 11:10 AM
01/24/21 11:10 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,219 New York
polyspheric
master
|
master
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,219
New York
|
Aluminum rods are permanently stretched every time they're run near their limit. Steel rods recover to some extent, last much longer.
It's not design or quality control, it's metallurgy.
Boffin Emeritus
|
|
|
Re: 7.1 h beam strength?
[Re: polyspheric]
#2879277
01/24/21 11:38 AM
01/24/21 11:38 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,941 NC
440Jim
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,941
NC
|
Aluminum rods are permanently stretched every time they're run near their limit. The important thing is the modern designs can be done to not run near their "limit"; so no permanent stretch occurs in applications like bracket racing.
|
|
|
|
|