Re: Roller vs solid
[Re: pittsburghracer]
#2725670
12/20/19 03:37 PM
12/20/19 03:37 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,545 So. Burlington, Vt.
fast68plymouth
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,545
So. Burlington, Vt.
|
In an all out stock appearing build what would be the power difference between a solid flat tappet cam and a roller. 499/400 iron intake and exhaust manifolds. Man I hate to see you spend all that money switching over to a roller cam in quest as you say you would be happy with a .10 of a second. I have seen so many people unhappy with this upgrade. You could very well see nothing with a stock cast iron intake and factory exhaust manifolds. There are way easier upgrades that are cheaper too. Could you share those FAST legal upgrades that would be worth .10?
68 Satellite, 383 with stock 906’s, 3550lbs, 11.18@123 Dealer for Comp Cams/Indy Heads
|
|
|
Re: Roller vs solid
[Re: fast68plymouth]
#2725674
12/20/19 03:48 PM
12/20/19 03:48 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 20,279 PA.
pittsburghracer
"Little"John
|
"Little"John
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 20,279
PA.
|
In an all out stock appearing build what would be the power difference between a solid flat tappet cam and a roller. 499/400 iron intake and exhaust manifolds. Man I hate to see you spend all that money switching over to a roller cam in quest as you say you would be happy with a .10 of a second. I have seen so many people unhappy with this upgrade. You could very well see nothing with a stock cast iron intake and factory exhaust manifolds. There are way easier upgrades that are cheaper too. Could you share those FAST legal upgrades that would be worth .10? Sure. Learn to cheat better. I could tell you but then everyone would know.
1970 Duster Edelbrock headed 408 5.984@112.52 422 Indy headed small block 5.982@112.56 mph 9.38@138.67
Livin and lovin life one day at a time
|
|
|
Re: Roller vs solid
[Re: fast68plymouth]
#2725676
12/20/19 03:57 PM
12/20/19 03:57 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 20,279 PA.
pittsburghracer
"Little"John
|
"Little"John
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 20,279
PA.
|
In an all out stock appearing build what would be the power difference between a solid flat tappet cam and a roller. 499/400 iron intake and exhaust manifolds. Man I hate to see you spend all that money switching over to a roller cam in quest as you say you would be happy with a .10 of a second. I have seen so many people unhappy with this upgrade. You could very well see nothing with a stock cast iron intake and factory exhaust manifolds. There are way easier upgrades that are cheaper too. Could you share those FAST legal upgrades that would be worth .10? It would help if those posting would give enough info when starting a post. I didn’t see this was a FAST engine type build till you mentioned it. Must be top secret. Lol.
1970 Duster Edelbrock headed 408 5.984@112.52 422 Indy headed small block 5.982@112.56 mph 9.38@138.67
Livin and lovin life one day at a time
|
|
|
Re: Roller vs solid
[Re: pittsburghracer]
#2725690
12/20/19 04:59 PM
12/20/19 04:59 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,545 So. Burlington, Vt.
fast68plymouth
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,545
So. Burlington, Vt.
|
In an all out stock appearing build what would be the power difference between a solid flat tappet cam and a roller. 499/400 iron intake and exhaust manifolds. Man I hate to see you spend all that money switching over to a roller cam in quest as you say you would be happy with a .10 of a second. I have seen so many people unhappy with this upgrade. You could very well see nothing with a stock cast iron intake and factory exhaust manifolds. There are way easier upgrades that are cheaper too. Could you share those FAST legal upgrades that would be worth .10? Sure. Learn to cheat better. I could tell you but then everyone would know. Well, you’re allowed to do pretty much anything you want that doesn’t show. It’s straight up heads up racing....... so whatever else you did...... if you left a tenth on the table by not using a different cam....... it’s still there for the taking. Maybe the guy next to you didn’t leave it on the table. But...... I agree that when you're asking for advice for things pertaining to running that class, it’s best to mention it right at the start, since there are things that work for other types of builds that don’t work for FAST type builds.
68 Satellite, 383 with stock 906’s, 3550lbs, 11.18@123 Dealer for Comp Cams/Indy Heads
|
|
|
Re: Roller vs solid
[Re: pittsburghracer]
#2725853
12/21/19 12:13 PM
12/21/19 12:13 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 55 CT
roadrunner2
OP
member
|
OP
member
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 55
CT
|
In an all out stock appearing build what would be the power difference between a solid flat tappet cam and a roller. 499/400 iron intake and exhaust manifolds. Man I hate to see you spend all that money switching over to a roller cam in quest as you say you would be happy with a .10 of a second. I have seen so many people unhappy with this upgrade. You could very well see nothing with a stock cast iron intake and factory exhaust manifolds. There are way easier upgrades that are cheaper too. Could you share those FAST legal upgrades that would be worth .10? It would help if those posting would give enough info when starting a post. I didn’t see this was a FAST engine type build till you mentioned it. Must be top secret. Lol. I did say "all out stock appearing build". Car is being built to run in the SuperCar series, but besides that and FAST I'm unaware of what else that could mean. Bill
1968 Road Runner 383 727 3.91 8 3/4 3520 with driver 11.04 @ 124.26 with 1.67 60’ Done on G70-14 redlines thru factory manifolds New quickest ever 383 build in FAST. 10:1 451” replaced with 14:1 499”.
|
|
|
Re: Roller vs solid
[Re: roadrunner2]
#2725890
12/21/19 03:08 PM
12/21/19 03:08 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,264 Oregon
AndyF
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,264
Oregon
|
In an all out stock appearing build what would be the power difference between a solid flat tappet cam and a roller. 499/400 iron intake and exhaust manifolds. Since you are traction limited I'd think the power difference matters less than the shape of the torque curve. And a roller cam would give you more control over the shape of the torque curve since you can get a lot more creative with the lobe shape. So if it was me, I'd start with a roller cam and never even bother using a flat tappet. I'm not saying it is going to be easy to find the best torque curve to match your chassis and your driving style, but with a roller cam it will be a lot easier to make adjustments.
|
|
|
Re: Roller vs solid
[Re: racerhog]
#2725939
12/21/19 06:07 PM
12/21/19 06:07 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,545 So. Burlington, Vt.
fast68plymouth
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,545
So. Burlington, Vt.
|
Is the 0.200" duration above 165°? Obviously only one way to know for sure....... but...... Based on my assumption of what that cam is, I’d say it’s 165. Bill can say if this is right or not, but I think he’s running 1.6 rockers too. Dwayne, I'm not asking you to give away any secrets or go into too much depth, I just know that there is more than 1 way to skin a cat and would like to know, if you were to spec a SFT for roadrunner2's 451, would it look anything similar to the cam card? Well...... yes..... and no. But I’m not going to get into any details....... also, as you say, there’s several ways to go about it. And...... obviously that cam is working pretty well in Bills car.
68 Satellite, 383 with stock 906’s, 3550lbs, 11.18@123 Dealer for Comp Cams/Indy Heads
|
|
|
Re: Roller vs solid
[Re: fast68plymouth]
#2725959
12/21/19 06:47 PM
12/21/19 06:47 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,334 Prospect, PA
BSB67
master
|
master
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,334
Prospect, PA
|
Is the 0.200" duration above 165°? Obviously only one way to know for sure....... but...... Based on my assumption of what that cam is, I’d say it’s 165. Bill can say if this is right or not, but I think he’s running 1.6 rockers too. 1.6 is what the card says. Looks like they are 6583/7396 lobes.
|
|
|
Re: Roller vs solid
[Re: BSB67]
#2725961
12/21/19 06:55 PM
12/21/19 06:55 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,545 So. Burlington, Vt.
fast68plymouth
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,545
So. Burlington, Vt.
|
From what I understand, the cam was in a different motor originally. That motor did have 1.6’s........ I don’t know if Bills are or not.
Those are what I assumed the lobes are as well.
68 Satellite, 383 with stock 906’s, 3550lbs, 11.18@123 Dealer for Comp Cams/Indy Heads
|
|
|
Re: Roller vs solid
[Re: pittsburghracer]
#2726046
12/22/19 10:15 AM
12/22/19 10:15 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 55 CT
roadrunner2
OP
member
|
OP
member
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 55
CT
|
Untitled by cudadude2, on Flickr Untitled by cudadude2, on Flickr Untitled by cudadude2, on Flickr Untitled by cudadude2, on Flickr This is the intake that I'm currently using on my 451. I have a much improved one that I'm building now with an even better one planned after that if I continue to try to compete with an iron 4 Bbl. That one will require professional help and I prefer to keep my stuff my stuff. My rockers are HS 1.6's. Bill
Last edited by roadrunner2; 12/22/19 10:19 AM.
1968 Road Runner 383 727 3.91 8 3/4 3520 with driver 11.04 @ 124.26 with 1.67 60’ Done on G70-14 redlines thru factory manifolds New quickest ever 383 build in FAST. 10:1 451” replaced with 14:1 499”.
|
|
|
Re: Roller vs solid
[Re: krautrock]
#2726055
12/22/19 10:46 AM
12/22/19 10:46 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,545 So. Burlington, Vt.
fast68plymouth
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,545
So. Burlington, Vt.
|
Not really relevant to the cam question....... but compression is your friend in these classes....... up to a point.
68 Satellite, 383 with stock 906’s, 3550lbs, 11.18@123 Dealer for Comp Cams/Indy Heads
|
|
|
Re: Roller vs solid
[Re: moparpro]
#2726093
12/22/19 12:12 PM
12/22/19 12:12 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 55 CT
roadrunner2
OP
member
|
OP
member
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 55
CT
|
change those rear tires to drag radials or slicks and you will improve even more. LOL. Not legal for my race classes. Have tried them on test and tunes and didn’t see any improvements. Car is designed to work on the little tires. B
1968 Road Runner 383 727 3.91 8 3/4 3520 with driver 11.04 @ 124.26 with 1.67 60’ Done on G70-14 redlines thru factory manifolds New quickest ever 383 build in FAST. 10:1 451” replaced with 14:1 499”.
|
|
|
Re: Roller vs solid
[Re: krautrock]
#2726094
12/22/19 12:13 PM
12/22/19 12:13 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 55 CT
roadrunner2
OP
member
|
OP
member
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 55
CT
|
what are your cylinder heads like??? Better than my intake. Medium porting. Big valves.
1968 Road Runner 383 727 3.91 8 3/4 3520 with driver 11.04 @ 124.26 with 1.67 60’ Done on G70-14 redlines thru factory manifolds New quickest ever 383 build in FAST. 10:1 451” replaced with 14:1 499”.
|
|
|
Re: Roller vs solid
[Re: fast68plymouth]
#2726095
12/22/19 12:14 PM
12/22/19 12:14 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 55 CT
roadrunner2
OP
member
|
OP
member
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 55
CT
|
Not really relevant to the cam question....... but compression is your friend in these classes....... up to a point.
Thinking 13:1. B
1968 Road Runner 383 727 3.91 8 3/4 3520 with driver 11.04 @ 124.26 with 1.67 60’ Done on G70-14 redlines thru factory manifolds New quickest ever 383 build in FAST. 10:1 451” replaced with 14:1 499”.
|
|
|
Re: Roller vs solid
[Re: roadrunner2]
#2726098
12/22/19 12:21 PM
12/22/19 12:21 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,545 So. Burlington, Vt.
fast68plymouth
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,545
So. Burlington, Vt.
|
Your car already has 60’ times better than the two quickest single 4bbl “383’s” in those classes.
With a 13:1 499 under the hood...... if you can keep the 60’ as good as it is currently, you should be able to go after the top spot.
It’s too bad Jim doesn’t bring the Dart out anymore......... there was a bunch of untapped potential with his car.
A little rivalry makes it interesting.
68 Satellite, 383 with stock 906’s, 3550lbs, 11.18@123 Dealer for Comp Cams/Indy Heads
|
|
|
|
|