Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4
Re: Roller vs solid [Re: pittsburghracer] #2725670
12/20/19 04:37 PM
12/20/19 04:37 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,491
So. Burlington, Vt.
F
fast68plymouth Offline
I Live Here
fast68plymouth  Offline
I Live Here
F

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,491
So. Burlington, Vt.
Originally Posted by pittsburghracer
Originally Posted by roadrunner2
In an all out stock appearing build what would be the power difference between a solid flat tappet cam and a roller. 499/400 iron intake and exhaust manifolds.





Man I hate to see you spend all that money switching over to a roller cam in quest as you say you would be happy with a .10 of a second. I have seen so many people unhappy with this upgrade. You could very well see nothing with a stock cast iron intake and factory exhaust manifolds. There are way easier upgrades that are cheaper too.


Could you share those FAST legal upgrades that would be worth .10?


68 Satellite, 383 with stock 906’s, 3550lbs, 11.18@123
Dealer for Comp Cams/Indy Heads
Re: Roller vs solid [Re: fast68plymouth] #2725674
12/20/19 04:48 PM
12/20/19 04:48 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 20,147
PA.
pittsburghracer Online work
"Little"John
pittsburghracer  Online Work
"Little"John

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 20,147
PA.
Originally Posted by fast68plymouth
Originally Posted by pittsburghracer
Originally Posted by roadrunner2
In an all out stock appearing build what would be the power difference between a solid flat tappet cam and a roller. 499/400 iron intake and exhaust manifolds.





Man I hate to see you spend all that money switching over to a roller cam in quest as you say you would be happy with a .10 of a second. I have seen so many people unhappy with this upgrade. You could very well see nothing with a stock cast iron intake and factory exhaust manifolds. There are way easier upgrades that are cheaper too.


Could you share those FAST legal upgrades that would be worth .10?





Sure. Learn to cheat better. I could tell you but then everyone would know.


1970 Duster
Edelbrock headed 408
5.984@112.52
422 Indy headed small block
5.982@112.56 mph
9.42@138.27

Livin and lovin life one day at a time




Re: Roller vs solid [Re: fast68plymouth] #2725676
12/20/19 04:57 PM
12/20/19 04:57 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 20,147
PA.
pittsburghracer Online work
"Little"John
pittsburghracer  Online Work
"Little"John

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 20,147
PA.
Originally Posted by fast68plymouth
Originally Posted by pittsburghracer
Originally Posted by roadrunner2
In an all out stock appearing build what would be the power difference between a solid flat tappet cam and a roller. 499/400 iron intake and exhaust manifolds.





Man I hate to see you spend all that money switching over to a roller cam in quest as you say you would be happy with a .10 of a second. I have seen so many people unhappy with this upgrade. You could very well see nothing with a stock cast iron intake and factory exhaust manifolds. There are way easier upgrades that are cheaper too.


Could you share those FAST legal upgrades that would be worth .10?




It would help if those posting would give enough info when starting a post. I didn’t see this was a FAST engine type build till you mentioned it. Must be top secret. Lol.


1970 Duster
Edelbrock headed 408
5.984@112.52
422 Indy headed small block
5.982@112.56 mph
9.42@138.27

Livin and lovin life one day at a time




Re: Roller vs solid [Re: pittsburghracer] #2725690
12/20/19 05:59 PM
12/20/19 05:59 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,491
So. Burlington, Vt.
F
fast68plymouth Offline
I Live Here
fast68plymouth  Offline
I Live Here
F

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,491
So. Burlington, Vt.
Originally Posted by pittsburghracer
Originally Posted by fast68plymouth
Originally Posted by pittsburghracer
Originally Posted by roadrunner2
In an all out stock appearing build what would be the power difference between a solid flat tappet cam and a roller. 499/400 iron intake and exhaust manifolds.





Man I hate to see you spend all that money switching over to a roller cam in quest as you say you would be happy with a .10 of a second. I have seen so many people unhappy with this upgrade. You could very well see nothing with a stock cast iron intake and factory exhaust manifolds. There are way easier upgrades that are cheaper too.


Could you share those FAST legal upgrades that would be worth .10?





Sure. Learn to cheat better. I could tell you but then everyone would know.


Well, you’re allowed to do pretty much anything you want that doesn’t show.

It’s straight up heads up racing....... so whatever else you did...... if you left a tenth on the table by not using a different cam....... it’s still there for the taking.
Maybe the guy next to you didn’t leave it on the table.

But...... I agree that when you're asking for advice for things pertaining to running that class, it’s best to mention it right at the start, since there are things that work for other types of builds that don’t work for FAST type builds.


68 Satellite, 383 with stock 906’s, 3550lbs, 11.18@123
Dealer for Comp Cams/Indy Heads
Re: Roller vs solid [Re: pittsburghracer] #2725853
12/21/19 01:13 PM
12/21/19 01:13 PM
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 55
CT
R
roadrunner2 Offline OP
member
roadrunner2  Offline OP
member
R

Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 55
CT
Originally Posted by pittsburghracer
Originally Posted by fast68plymouth
Originally Posted by pittsburghracer
Originally Posted by roadrunner2
In an all out stock appearing build what would be the power difference between a solid flat tappet cam and a roller. 499/400 iron intake and exhaust manifolds.





Man I hate to see you spend all that money switching over to a roller cam in quest as you say you would be happy with a .10 of a second. I have seen so many people unhappy with this upgrade. You could very well see nothing with a stock cast iron intake and factory exhaust manifolds. There are way easier upgrades that are cheaper too.


Could you share those FAST legal upgrades that would be worth .10?




It would help if those posting would give enough info when starting a post. I didn’t see this was a FAST engine type build till you mentioned it. Must be top secret. Lol.



I did say "all out stock appearing build". Car is being built to run in the SuperCar series, but besides that and FAST I'm unaware of what else that could mean.

Bill


1968 Road Runner 383 727 3.91 8 3/4 3520 with driver 11.04 @ 124.26 with 1.67 60’
Done on G70-14 redlines thru factory manifolds New quickest ever 383 build in FAST.
10:1 451” replaced with 14:1 499”.
Re: Roller vs solid [Re: roadrunner2] #2725890
12/21/19 04:08 PM
12/21/19 04:08 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 30,989
Oregon
A
AndyF Offline
I Win
AndyF  Offline
I Win
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 30,989
Oregon
Originally Posted by roadrunner2
In an all out stock appearing build what would be the power difference between a solid flat tappet cam and a roller. 499/400 iron intake and exhaust manifolds.


Since you are traction limited I'd think the power difference matters less than the shape of the torque curve. And a roller cam would give you more control over the shape of the torque curve since you can get a lot more creative with the lobe shape. So if it was me, I'd start with a roller cam and never even bother using a flat tappet. I'm not saying it is going to be easy to find the best torque curve to match your chassis and your driving style, but with a roller cam it will be a lot easier to make adjustments.

Re: Roller vs solid [Re: roadrunner2] #2725920
12/21/19 06:14 PM
12/21/19 06:14 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,310
Prospect, PA
BSB67 Offline
master
BSB67  Offline
master

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,310
Prospect, PA
I cannot tell you how much you would gain. Probably not much if you are keeping identical advertised and 0.050" numbers you have with the Scott Brown cam. A roller isn't going to move the valve much faster than that. Is the 0.200" duration above 165°?

Are you in an all out chase for the top spot relative to the "other" cast iron 4bbl intake BBMs in FAST and SC?

If so, I would probably suggest something like this order:
1) Make the intake the very best you can within your skill set/budget.
2) Install and go to the track and test with the cam you have now.
3) Then after establishing a solid baseline corrected to std conditions, then start changing testing and recording the results of the following for the cam you have now:
a) increase and decrease lash 0.004" on the intake.Keep going until it slows down
b) then do the same on the exhaust
c) then advance and retard the cam in 3° increments.
4) Read the tea leaves from the data and extrapolate your findings to spec youself a solid roller from what you've learned picking lobes that move the valve as fast as possible. Your valvetrain will hate you.

If you have not done this already, you might find a tenth or two and a mph or two with the cam you have.

Or call Dwyane and have a conversation.








Re: Roller vs solid [Re: roadrunner2] #2725927
12/21/19 06:36 PM
12/21/19 06:36 PM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 452
Monrovia, So-Cal, USA
racerhog Offline
mopar
racerhog  Offline
mopar

Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 452
Monrovia, So-Cal, USA
Roller is the way to go.... Hands down...


Bob(Cowboy)Hogan
Monrovia So-Cal
Re: Roller vs solid [Re: racerhog] #2725939
12/21/19 07:07 PM
12/21/19 07:07 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,491
So. Burlington, Vt.
F
fast68plymouth Offline
I Live Here
fast68plymouth  Offline
I Live Here
F

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,491
So. Burlington, Vt.
Quote
Is the 0.200" duration above 165°?


Obviously only one way to know for sure....... but......

Based on my assumption of what that cam is, I’d say it’s 165.

Bill can say if this is right or not, but I think he’s running 1.6 rockers too.

Quote
Dwayne, I'm not asking you to give away any secrets or go into too much depth, I just know that there is more than 1 way to skin a cat and would like to know, if you were to spec a SFT for roadrunner2's 451, would it look anything similar to the cam card?


Well...... yes..... and no.
But I’m not going to get into any details....... also, as you say, there’s several ways to go about it.
And...... obviously that cam is working pretty well in Bills car.


68 Satellite, 383 with stock 906’s, 3550lbs, 11.18@123
Dealer for Comp Cams/Indy Heads
Re: Roller vs solid [Re: fast68plymouth] #2725959
12/21/19 07:47 PM
12/21/19 07:47 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,310
Prospect, PA
BSB67 Offline
master
BSB67  Offline
master

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,310
Prospect, PA
Originally Posted by fast68plymouth
Quote
Is the 0.200" duration above 165°?


Obviously only one way to know for sure....... but......

Based on my assumption of what that cam is, I’d say it’s 165.

Bill can say if this is right or not, but I think he’s running 1.6 rockers too.


1.6 is what the card says. Looks like they are 6583/7396 lobes.

Re: Roller vs solid [Re: BSB67] #2725961
12/21/19 07:55 PM
12/21/19 07:55 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,491
So. Burlington, Vt.
F
fast68plymouth Offline
I Live Here
fast68plymouth  Offline
I Live Here
F

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,491
So. Burlington, Vt.
From what I understand, the cam was in a different motor originally.
That motor did have 1.6’s........ I don’t know if Bills are or not.

Those are what I assumed the lobes are as well.


68 Satellite, 383 with stock 906’s, 3550lbs, 11.18@123
Dealer for Comp Cams/Indy Heads
Re: Roller vs solid [Re: fast68plymouth] #2726004
12/22/19 01:33 AM
12/22/19 01:33 AM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 20,147
PA.
pittsburghracer Online work
"Little"John
pittsburghracer  Online Work
"Little"John

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 20,147
PA.
Here you go. My buddy spent 800.00 on carted gears and ceramic bearings and picked up .30 in his 11 second car.
http://microblueracing.com/?fbclid=IwAR17jjdtsHqPgR_JlUC2sLe0Z2RDf_9d04F2I5icDDg3B7mk__Zxi5dHDrU

8E496580-C583-43E8-84E7-148977603C63.jpeg

1970 Duster
Edelbrock headed 408
5.984@112.52
422 Indy headed small block
5.982@112.56 mph
9.42@138.27

Livin and lovin life one day at a time




Re: Roller vs solid [Re: pittsburghracer] #2726046
12/22/19 11:15 AM
12/22/19 11:15 AM
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 55
CT
R
roadrunner2 Offline OP
member
roadrunner2  Offline OP
member
R

Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 55
CT
[Linked Image]Untitled by cudadude2, on Flickr

[Linked Image]Untitled by cudadude2, on Flickr

[Linked Image]Untitled by cudadude2, on Flickr


[Linked Image]Untitled by cudadude2, on Flickr
This is the intake that I'm currently using on my 451. I have a much improved one that I'm building now with an even better one planned after that if I continue to try to compete with an iron 4 Bbl. That one will require professional help and I prefer to keep my stuff my stuff.

My rockers are HS 1.6's.

Bill

Last edited by roadrunner2; 12/22/19 11:19 AM.

1968 Road Runner 383 727 3.91 8 3/4 3520 with driver 11.04 @ 124.26 with 1.67 60’
Done on G70-14 redlines thru factory manifolds New quickest ever 383 build in FAST.
10:1 451” replaced with 14:1 499”.
Re: Roller vs solid [Re: roadrunner2] #2726050
12/22/19 11:34 AM
12/22/19 11:34 AM
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 514
georgia
M
moparpro Offline
mopar
moparpro  Offline
mopar
M

Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 514
georgia
change those rear tires to drag radials or slicks and you will improve even more. LOL.

Re: Roller vs solid [Re: roadrunner2] #2726052
12/22/19 11:38 AM
12/22/19 11:38 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,094
central texas
K
krautrock Offline
top fuel
krautrock  Offline
top fuel
K

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,094
central texas
what are your cylinder heads like???

Re: Roller vs solid [Re: krautrock] #2726055
12/22/19 11:46 AM
12/22/19 11:46 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,491
So. Burlington, Vt.
F
fast68plymouth Offline
I Live Here
fast68plymouth  Offline
I Live Here
F

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,491
So. Burlington, Vt.
Not really relevant to the cam question....... but compression is your friend in these classes....... up to a point.


68 Satellite, 383 with stock 906’s, 3550lbs, 11.18@123
Dealer for Comp Cams/Indy Heads
Re: Roller vs solid [Re: moparpro] #2726093
12/22/19 01:12 PM
12/22/19 01:12 PM
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 55
CT
R
roadrunner2 Offline OP
member
roadrunner2  Offline OP
member
R

Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 55
CT
Originally Posted by moparpro
change those rear tires to drag radials or slicks and you will improve even more. LOL.


Not legal for my race classes. Have tried them on test and tunes and didn’t see any improvements. Car is designed to work on the little tires.

B


1968 Road Runner 383 727 3.91 8 3/4 3520 with driver 11.04 @ 124.26 with 1.67 60’
Done on G70-14 redlines thru factory manifolds New quickest ever 383 build in FAST.
10:1 451” replaced with 14:1 499”.
Re: Roller vs solid [Re: krautrock] #2726094
12/22/19 01:13 PM
12/22/19 01:13 PM
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 55
CT
R
roadrunner2 Offline OP
member
roadrunner2  Offline OP
member
R

Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 55
CT
Originally Posted by krautrock
what are your cylinder heads like???


Better than my intake. Medium porting. Big valves.


1968 Road Runner 383 727 3.91 8 3/4 3520 with driver 11.04 @ 124.26 with 1.67 60’
Done on G70-14 redlines thru factory manifolds New quickest ever 383 build in FAST.
10:1 451” replaced with 14:1 499”.
Re: Roller vs solid [Re: fast68plymouth] #2726095
12/22/19 01:14 PM
12/22/19 01:14 PM
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 55
CT
R
roadrunner2 Offline OP
member
roadrunner2  Offline OP
member
R

Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 55
CT
Originally Posted by fast68plymouth
Not really relevant to the cam question....... but compression is your friend in these classes....... up to a point.



Thinking 13:1.

B


1968 Road Runner 383 727 3.91 8 3/4 3520 with driver 11.04 @ 124.26 with 1.67 60’
Done on G70-14 redlines thru factory manifolds New quickest ever 383 build in FAST.
10:1 451” replaced with 14:1 499”.
Re: Roller vs solid [Re: roadrunner2] #2726098
12/22/19 01:21 PM
12/22/19 01:21 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,491
So. Burlington, Vt.
F
fast68plymouth Offline
I Live Here
fast68plymouth  Offline
I Live Here
F

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,491
So. Burlington, Vt.
Your car already has 60’ times better than the two quickest single 4bbl “383’s” in those classes.

With a 13:1 499 under the hood...... if you can keep the 60’ as good as it is currently, you should be able to go after the top spot.

It’s too bad Jim doesn’t bring the Dart out anymore......... there was a bunch of untapped potential with his car.

A little rivalry makes it interesting.


68 Satellite, 383 with stock 906’s, 3550lbs, 11.18@123
Dealer for Comp Cams/Indy Heads
Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1