Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Re: Brett miller and the mw victor project [Re: mopar dave] #2708767
10/21/19 08:48 AM
10/21/19 08:48 AM
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,835
MI, usa
dvw Offline
master
dvw  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,835
MI, usa
The quickest Victor headed car I've seen is Jeff Freeses N/SS 572" 68 Cuda. Been 9.0@around 3350.
Doug

Re: Brett miller and the mw victor project [Re: BradH] #2708878
10/21/19 01:56 PM
10/21/19 01:56 PM
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 114
NW Indiana
P
powertrip Offline
member
powertrip  Offline
member
P

Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 114
NW Indiana
Originally Posted by BradH
My last data points, then I'll back away from the keyboard and let the discussion continue without me.

Avg of 4 intake port tests on PRH flow bench with 2.20" valve:
.100 - 75
.200 - 151
.300 - 220
.400 - 280
.500 - 326
.600 - 346
.700 - 355

294 cc; Min CSA 2.65; Avg CSA 2.76

This is a true standard port opening that requires no gasket trimming for proper port alignment.

EDIT (and THEN I'll go away): To anyone outside of the Mopar world, those specs would pass for a mediocre -- at best -- 15* SB Chevy head. I've joked around before that building a stock-stroke 440 is basically building a stroker small-block with a really sh!tty bob weight.


Those are impressive flow numbers for that size port, very efficient. Where at in the port is that 2.65 MCSA located?

Re: Brett miller and the mw victor project [Re: BradH] #2708905
10/21/19 03:29 PM
10/21/19 03:29 PM
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 876
Missouri
J
jwb123 Offline
super stock
jwb123  Offline
super stock
J

Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 876
Missouri
Originally Posted by BradH
My last data points, then I'll back away from the keyboard and let the discussion continue without me.

Avg of 4 intake port tests on PRH flow bench with 2.20" valve:
.100 - 75
.200 - 151
.300 - 220
.400 - 280
.500 - 326
.600 - 346
.700 - 355

294 cc; Min CSA 2.65; Avg CSA 2.76

This is a true standard port opening that requires no gasket trimming for proper port alignment.

EDIT (and THEN I'll go away): To anyone outside of the Mopar world, those specs would pass for a mediocre -- at best -- 15* SB Chevy head. I've joked around before that building a stock-stroke 440 is basically building a stroker small-block with a really sh!tty bob weight.


My heads are some of the early ones that I opened up to max wedge specs myself, I got these numbers super flow 450 bench at 28 inches clay radius on intake and no pipe on the exhaust. Stock gasket opening like yours.
intake
.100 75cfm
.200 149
.300 219
.400 299
.500 323
.600 330

exhaust
.100 57
.200 109
.300 157
.400 190
.500 209
.600 222

I never flowed them at a higher lift as at the time my cam was just slightly over .600 lift 3,200lb 512 CID, car ran best of 9.65 @ 139mph NSS car with two 750 AFB's So from your experience I don't have much left in porting these heads any more? Any comments or tips is appreciated. On the engine stand now, will be 540 CID with a .740 lift cam for next year.

Last edited by jwb123; 10/21/19 03:31 PM.
Re: Brett miller and the mw victor project [Re: jwb123] #2708926
10/21/19 04:39 PM
10/21/19 04:39 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,496
So. Burlington, Vt.
F
fast68plymouth Offline
I Live Here
fast68plymouth  Offline
I Live Here
F

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,496
So. Burlington, Vt.
First, understand that comparing your numbers to numbers from other benches is often just comparing flow benches.

What you really want to know is, what did they flow before you worked on them compared to after.

That being the preface for this: 299@.400 seems like a really really high number for those heads...... I wouldn’t expect to see that here.
Never say never....... but that would be freakishly high for a B.B. Mopar wedge head.
On the other side of the coin, 220@.700 seems pretty low for the ex ports.

One of the first sets of Victor heads I worked on was before the MW version existed.
Owner wanted to use a MW manifold, so I opened the std ones to MW size.
They had already rec’d some blending/clean up when I got them.
I tested them as rec’d, then with the opening enlarged, and the roof line blended deep enough to make from a smooth transition up to the new opening.
I’d have to find my notes to see the exact difference that alone made....... but it was very very little...... like under 5cfm.
They were also in the 330@.700 range.
I ended up getting them near 350 after going MW size and then making the rest of the port a little bigger as well.

How I remember those is that the low/mid-lift numbers were fairly soft.

Edit...... found my notes......
As rec’d, std port opening - 334.0 @.700
Open to MW size - 334.8 @.700
Recut seats, rework chamber, raise roof more, and farther into runner - 349.4 @.700

All those tests showed right about 266 @.400.

Low lift flow not as I had remembered....
.100— 69
.200—146
.300—215

I’m pretty sure with more of a “dyno contest” cam and a better working carb we could have tweaked another 15-20hp out of Brads motor.


68 Satellite, 383 with stock 906’s, 3550lbs, 11.18@123
Dealer for Comp Cams/Indy Heads
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1