Re: Body color or ?????
[Re: hemi70se]
#2628697
03/04/19 02:57 PM
03/04/19 02:57 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,640 Nashville, TN
MOPARMIKE69
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,640
Nashville, TN
|
I think it's way easier to paint the bottom side of the car in the factory primer overspray method. It IS how they came new! No time consuming masking, and heck of $ savings in paint materials! I want to puke everytime I see a car full painted body color underneath. The ironic part is after restoring it incorrectly they add paint dabs and parts tags to detail it up. Why bother, it's incorrect from the get-go! EXACTLY! Well said!
69 Road Runner vert 69 GTX hard top 70 Road Runner 4 speed 70 Hemi Cuda vert
|
|
|
Re: Body color or ?????
[Re: MOPARMIKE69]
#2628884
03/04/19 10:17 PM
03/04/19 10:17 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 768 Dry Heat AZ
AAR#2
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 768
Dry Heat AZ
|
I think it's way easier to paint the bottom side of the car in the factory primer overspray method. It IS how they came new! No time consuming masking, and heck of $ savings in paint materials! I want to puke everytime I see a car full painted body color underneath. The ironic part is after restoring it incorrectly they add paint dabs and parts tags to detail it up. Why bother, it's incorrect from the get-go! EXACTLY! Well said! Good to see no shortage of strong opinion on this thread, do you boys feel the same about ALL the other incorrect feature you place on your cars?? Clear coat paint, electronic ignition, radial tires, how about the felt on rubber window stoppers or clamps with original markings. See, now I want to puke!! Good to see nothing less than perfection is what you all drive
|
|
|
Re: Body color or ?????
[Re: AAR#2]
#2628954
03/05/19 01:17 AM
03/05/19 01:17 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 9,550 Sacramento CA
Morty426
master
|
master
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 9,550
Sacramento CA
|
I think it's way easier to paint the bottom side of the car in the factory primer overspray method. It IS how they came new! No time consuming masking, and heck of $ savings in paint materials! I want to puke everytime I see a car full painted body color underneath. The ironic part is after restoring it incorrectly they add paint dabs and parts tags to detail it up. Why bother, it's incorrect from the get-go! EXACTLY! Well said! Good to see no shortage of strong opinion on this thread, do you boys feel the same about ALL the other incorrect feature you place on your cars?? Clear coat paint, electronic ignition, radial tires, how about the felt on rubber window stoppers or clamps with original markings. See, now I want to puke!! Good to see nothing less than perfection is what you all drive My car does not have any of things
|
|
|
Re: Body color or ?????
[Re: nobrakesneeded]
#2628995
03/05/19 02:54 AM
03/05/19 02:54 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 42,714 Spokane Washington
ScottSmith_Harms
Mr Wizzard
|
Mr Wizzard
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 42,714
Spokane Washington
|
Niether does mine. The body and paint of a car is it's foundation, if you get that part correct you can change most anything else that bolts on fairly easily, whether that be a small item like hose clamps, or a major item like an engine swap, it's easy to go back to stock if you want. What hemi70se said makes sense, when you have a car with a major incorrect item like a perfectly painted floor pan (which is not original, it's custom), adding a bunch of production line detail items, inspection markings, paint daubs, etc. is a bit silly. If you want a customized car, build a custom car, if you want an original O.E. correct car, build it, nobody is knocking either one. But if you mix the two together you can expect mixed reactions and opinions if asked, just the way it is. .02 Good to see no shortage of strong opinion on this thread, do you boys feel the same about ALL the other incorrect feature you place on your cars?? Clear coat paint, electronic ignition, radial tires, how about the felt on rubber window stoppers or clamps with original markings. See, now I want to puke!! Good to see nothing less than perfection is what you all drive Before you get too worked up about the responses here keep in mind it's a restoration question on the restoration forum.
|
|
|
Re: Body color or ?????
[Re: ScottSmith_Harms]
#2629055
03/05/19 10:43 AM
03/05/19 10:43 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 768 Dry Heat AZ
AAR#2
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 768
Dry Heat AZ
|
Niether does mine. The body and paint of a car is it's foundation, if you get that part correct you can change most anything else that bolts on fairly easily, whether that be a small item like hose clamps, or a major item like an engine swap, it's easy to go back to stock if you want. What hemi70se said makes sense, when you have a car with a major incorrect item like a perfectly painted floor pan (which is not original, it's custom), adding a bunch of production line detail items, inspection markings, paint daubs, etc. is a bit silly. If you want a customized car, build a custom car, if you want an original O.E. correct car, build it, nobody is knocking either one. But if you mix the two together you can expect mixed reactions and opinions if asked, just the way it is. .02 Good to see no shortage of strong opinion on this thread, do you boys feel the same about ALL the other incorrect feature you place on your cars?? Clear coat paint, electronic ignition, radial tires, how about the felt on rubber window stoppers or clamps with original markings. See, now I want to puke!! Good to see nothing less than perfection is what you all drive Before you get too worked up about the responses here keep in mind it's a restoration question on the restoration forum. Scott, I do understand, and no argument that the correct way to finish is as described with primer and overspray. I think what gets me most is todays anonymity that comes with the internet and everyones over the top opinions and lack of civility. There are ways to express an opinion without adding a touch of 'rude'.
|
|
|
Re: Body color or ?????
[Re: AAR#2]
#2629098
03/05/19 12:37 PM
03/05/19 12:37 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,640 Nashville, TN
MOPARMIKE69
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,640
Nashville, TN
|
Niether does mine. The body and paint of a car is it's foundation, if you get that part correct you can change most anything else that bolts on fairly easily, whether that be a small item like hose clamps, or a major item like an engine swap, it's easy to go back to stock if you want. What hemi70se said makes sense, when you have a car with a major incorrect item like a perfectly painted floor pan (which is not original, it's custom), adding a bunch of production line detail items, inspection markings, paint daubs, etc. is a bit silly. If you want a customized car, build a custom car, if you want an original O.E. correct car, build it, nobody is knocking either one. But if you mix the two together you can expect mixed reactions and opinions if asked, just the way it is. .02 Good to see no shortage of strong opinion on this thread, do you boys feel the same about ALL the other incorrect feature you place on your cars?? Clear coat paint, electronic ignition, radial tires, how about the felt on rubber window stoppers or clamps with original markings. See, now I want to puke!! Good to see nothing less than perfection is what you all drive Before you get too worked up about the responses here keep in mind it's a restoration question on the restoration forum. Scott, I do understand, and no argument that the correct way to finish is as described with primer and overspray. I think what gets me most is todays anonymity that comes with the internet and everyones over the top opinions and lack of civility. There are ways to express an opinion without adding a touch of 'rude'. I see nothing rude on this thread. It's pretty straight forward. Like already said it's either original correct or it is custom. AAR#2 Yes I do have original down to the correct markings, nuts and bolts on all the cars I build. They are as correct as humanly possible and if someone can prove I am wrong then I change it to the most correct it can be. I appreciate all Mopars no matter what the condition. But if you are wanting information about these cars on the restoration forum, that's what you are going to get.
69 Road Runner vert 69 GTX hard top 70 Road Runner 4 speed 70 Hemi Cuda vert
|
|
|
Re: Body color or ?????
[Re: MOPARMIKE69]
#2629117
03/05/19 01:17 PM
03/05/19 01:17 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 768 Dry Heat AZ
AAR#2
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 768
Dry Heat AZ
|
Niether does mine. The body and paint of a car is it's foundation, if you get that part correct you can change most anything else that bolts on fairly easily, whether that be a small item like hose clamps, or a major item like an engine swap, it's easy to go back to stock if you want. What hemi70se said makes sense, when you have a car with a major incorrect item like a perfectly painted floor pan (which is not original, it's custom), adding a bunch of production line detail items, inspection markings, paint daubs, etc. is a bit silly. If you want a customized car, build a custom car, if you want an original O.E. correct car, build it, nobody is knocking either one. But if you mix the two together you can expect mixed reactions and opinions if asked, just the way it is. .02 Good to see no shortage of strong opinion on this thread, do you boys feel the same about ALL the other incorrect feature you place on your cars?? Clear coat paint, electronic ignition, radial tires, how about the felt on rubber window stoppers or clamps with original markings. See, now I want to puke!! Good to see nothing less than perfection is what you all drive Before you get too worked up about the responses here keep in mind it's a restoration question on the restoration forum. Scott, I do understand, and no argument that the correct way to finish is as described with primer and overspray. I think what gets me most is todays anonymity that comes with the internet and everyones over the top opinions and lack of civility. There are ways to express an opinion without adding a touch of 'rude'. I see nothing rude on this thread. It's pretty straight forward. Like already said it's either original correct or it is custom. AAR#2 Yes I do have original down to the correct markings, nuts and bolts on all the cars I build. They are as correct as humanly possible and if someone can prove I am wrong then I change it to the most correct it can be. I appreciate all Mopars no matter what the condition. But if you are wanting information about these cars on the restoration forum, that's what you are going to get. I think the point is being missed, I realize it’s the restoration forum, I realize right from wrong and not only support it but live for it. But I also realize that voicing an opinion that forces a violent body reaction (such as puking) to what one would choose to do, or not do to their car may be a bit extreme. Final post on the matter
|
|
|
Re: Body color or ?????
[Re: A12]
#2629507
03/06/19 08:43 AM
03/06/19 08:43 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,916 usa
lewtot184
master
|
master
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,916
usa
|
I have a '65 coronet and a '69 coronet r/t. both have the original underbody paint. looks to be a flat black to me. both have some body color overspray showing. Wouldn't by chance both are LA assembly plant cars? the '65 coronet came from LA. the '69 coronet r/t was lynch road,...I think?
|
|
|
Re: Body color or ?????
[Re: 69gtxvert]
#2768992
04/28/20 08:29 AM
04/28/20 08:29 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,390 Az
69hemibeep
pro stock
|
pro stock
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,390
Az
|
A little late to the party here but a follow up undercoating question....If a car was undercoated, was it done after the gas tank was installed? Should the bottom of the trunk floor just be the dark gray dip/primer color, regardless of the undercoating originally done? Mine had no undercoat above the tank.
1969 Hemi Roadrunner 2nd owner
|
|
|
Re: Body color or ?????
[Re: 69hemibeep]
#2769020
04/28/20 10:09 AM
04/28/20 10:09 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 606 Mass
charge70
mopar
|
mopar
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 606
Mass
|
My brothers 70 Charger was grey dip coat above the gas tank.
1970 Dodge Charger R/T S.E.
1969 Dodge Dart GTS 440 M-Code
1970 Dodge Charger 500 383/4-speed w/A.C.
|
|
|
|
|