|
Re: 2946186 CA332 Air Filter
[Re: 6pktgo]
#2597710
12/27/18 07:45 PM
12/27/18 07:45 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 18,157 Mass
DAYCLONA
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 18,157
Mass
|
Did I get taken 30 years ago, when I bought 3 of these, for my V code 70 Charger? I was told ,back then they were factory original parts. Pretty sure I paid $100 a piece. Thoughts Anyone ?? Yep you got taken 30 yrs ago, they're just FRAM replacements that retailed between $30-$50 dollars back then, but you'll be able to recoup, but your probably not going to see no more than $250 each if you Ebay them, quite a few of them out there to market against...
|
|
|
Re: 2946186 CA332 Air Filter
[Re: 6pktgo]
#2597713
12/27/18 07:48 PM
12/27/18 07:48 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 18,157 Mass
DAYCLONA
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 18,157
Mass
|
Ever seen a parts label like that? Seems like a lot of trouble to go through to fake a label?? So is this whole filter/box ,a fake? Nobody said you bought a fake dude! just that you overpaid back in the day, probably dealer mark up if you bought them thru Chrysler, that's the same box and filter I could buy at my local Sears Automotive store back in the day...
|
|
|
Re: 2946186 CA332 Air Filter
[Re: ScottSmith_Harms]
#2597978
12/28/18 02:14 PM
12/28/18 02:14 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,674 California
biggE
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,674
California
|
The problem is the screen. The round punched hole style are what people restoring cars pay up for. The cross hatch style bring a LOT less. Yes, as Scott pointed out they have the wrong screen. They're not what people are restoring cars with.
|
|
|
Re: 2946186 CA332 Air Filter
[Re: 6pktgo]
#2598134
12/28/18 09:02 PM
12/28/18 09:02 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,806 Northern NJ
StukaJU87
master
|
master
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,806
Northern NJ
|
One of those sure would look a LOT better in my car than the ugly ass K&N that is in there now.
Scott
1969 Super Bee, 383/4 speed
|
|
|
|
|
|