|
|
Re: EB 340 Torker II Single Plane Intake Any Good?
[Re: ScottSmith_Harms]
#252079
03/12/09 09:26 PM
03/12/09 09:26 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,826
las vegas
70AARcuda
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,826
las vegas
|
had a torker 2 and it ran the same ET as a holley strip dominator..
Tony
70 AARCuda Vitamin C
71 Dart Swinger 360 10.318 @ 128.22(10-04-14 Bakersfield)
71 Demon 360 10.666 @122.41 (01-29-17 @ Las Vegas)
71 Duster 408 (10.29 @ 127.86 3/16/19 Las Vegas)
|
|
|
Re: EB 340 Torker II Single Plane Intake Any Good?
[Re: ScottSmith_Harms]
#252083
03/13/09 09:34 PM
03/13/09 09:34 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,200
Upper Midwest
MoparforLife
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,200
Upper Midwest
|
Quote:
One just fell in my lap, are these a good intake for a street/strip car? Where do the fall in line as compared to the better similar application SB intakes available?
The 340 Torker is an abortion in the enth degree. The Torker II is a different animal and works much better. I prefer the results of the RPM, Airgap or even teh LD340. 
|
|
|
Re: EB 340 Torker II Single Plane Intake Any Good?
[Re: MoparJim]
#252085
03/13/09 10:03 PM
03/13/09 10:03 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,616
Kissimmee Fl.
dusturbd340W5
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,616
Kissimmee Fl.
|
I cant say I had a 68 cuda with a 360 and a original torker that car ran real well.
70 duster full chassis super pro 416 CNC Indybrock heads 727 w/brake
best so far 1.212 60 6.219 in 1/8 at 110.88 9.768 at 137.81 1/4
|
|
|
Re: EB 340 Torker II Single Plane Intake Any Good?
[Re: MoparforLife]
#252087
03/14/09 12:34 PM
03/14/09 12:34 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,327
Glendale, AZ
69L78Nova
Banned. Forever.
|
Banned. Forever.
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,327
Glendale, AZ
|
I was NOT happy with the one I ran for a short time. And I had MANY intakes to compare it to
1969 Nova
454/M21/3.31
Mild mid-11 second weekend cruiser
1994 F150 XLT Super Cab 2WD
5.0/4R70W/3.55
(Daily driver)
|
|
|
Re: EB 340 Torker II Single Plane Intake Any Good?
[Re: 69L78Nova]
#252088
03/15/09 12:59 PM
03/15/09 12:59 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,586
Tampa, FL
tpabayflyer
pro stock
|
pro stock
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,586
Tampa, FL
|
I really don't have anything to compare it to as I had to use one as it was the only performance intake that would fit using the stock AC..... It was either this single plane or a regular performer intake and that would have strangled my combo for sure......... It seems to have quite a bit of plenum area and provides plenty of upper rpm power. It is a bit soggy down low but not too bad. I run a 390 stroker in a 4140LB 83 Cordoba with me in it and my best time was 13.2@105mph... TBF
71 Challenger 528 Hemi project
09 Gr Cherokee 5.7 hemi in da house!!
|
|
|
Re: EB 340 Torker II Single Plane Intake Any Good?
[Re: tpabayflyer]
#252089
03/15/09 01:27 PM
03/15/09 01:27 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,266
Renton Washington
Triple Threat
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,266
Renton Washington
|
The majority of your street/strip oriented crowd will say the Air gap intake is your best choice, good low end from its dual plane design with still enough plenum and runner volume to run well up top.
Torker 2 is a single plane intake, so expect a little less low end, but maybe a bit more up high depending on if the engine combo can use the bigger intake.
Depending on what its going on, it might not be the best intake available, but If one fell into my lap, I would probably use it.
-Dustin
67 Dart, 9 second, 392" G3 Hemi
68 Barracuda 340 F/SA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
