Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: M1 vs. RPM [Re: Von] #2440228
01/24/18 09:10 PM
01/24/18 09:10 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,317
State of confusion
T
Thumperdart Offline
I Live Here
Thumperdart  Offline
I Live Here
T

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,317
State of confusion
Originally Posted By Von
Originally Posted By Cab_Burge
Von, the RPM is a great intake for the street up No matter what C.I on anything that has less than a all out solid roller cam with 440 size port heads shruggy scope
I've dyno tested multiple RB and B motors with a bunch of different intake, the RPM is the best over all for low RPM HP and torque, especially with light part throttle driving below 3500 RPM scope
I haven't done any same day at the track tests on BB 440 intakes in a long time so no valid feedback on that blush


I still venture that overall...a RPM is a choke on 500 plus inches, unless we are talking a super heavy/pulling type application.



iagree drinking


72 Dart 470 n/a BB stroker street car `THUMPER`...Check me out on FB Dominic Thumper for videos and lots of carb pics......760-900-3895.....
Re: M1 vs. RPM [Re: OhioMopar] #2440262
01/24/18 10:19 PM
01/24/18 10:19 PM
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,696
jersey
S
Spaceman Spiff Offline
master
Spaceman Spiff  Offline
master
S

Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,696
jersey
My wagon, 4600lbs, 526 inches, unported rpm heads, 10.6 compression, mild cam. 2600 stall, 3.73's.
had a rpm w/ 850 holley. ran ok. changed to an M1, and a 1000cfm 4150 quick fuel carb.
HOLY CRAP. a difference of night and day. car feels like an animal now.
go with the M1.


526 cubes of angry wedge, pushbutton shifted, 9 passenger killer!
Re: M1 vs. RPM [Re: Spaceman Spiff] #2440319
01/25/18 12:16 AM
01/25/18 12:16 AM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,157
Bend,OR USA
C
Cab_Burge Offline
I Win
Cab_Burge  Offline
I Win
C

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,157
Bend,OR USA
Do you think the 150 CFM bigger carb. didn't help? work
I haven't seen or heard of any BB Mopar, B or RB , that didn't go quicker and faster with a bigger carb work


Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
Re: M1 vs. RPM [Re: Cab_Burge] #2440322
01/25/18 12:21 AM
01/25/18 12:21 AM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,698
NE Oklahoma
V
Von Offline
master
Von  Offline
master
V

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,698
NE Oklahoma
Originally Posted By Cab_Burge
Do you think the 150 CFM bigger carb. didn't help? work
I haven't seen or heard of any BB Mopar, B or RB , that didn't go quicker and faster with a bigger carb work


I'd say some. But considering the actual flow difference between a 850 and 1000, is not near 150 cfm, ,I'll say not that much.


72 RR, Pump gas 440, 452s, 3800 lbs, Corked, ET Radials,. 11.33@117.72. Same car, bone stock 346s, 9.5 comp, baby solid. 12.24@110.
Re: M1 vs. RPM [Re: Von] #2440330
01/25/18 12:27 AM
01/25/18 12:27 AM
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 784
Liverpool, NY
S
SILVER67 Offline
super stock
SILVER67  Offline
super stock
S

Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 784
Liverpool, NY
Originally Posted By Von
Silver,

Exhaust is costing you a solid tenth, (maybe .15) , it looks like?


Yea, the coronet did seem to like the open exhaust.
The exhaust system is full 3" to the bumper with Flowmaster's
I guess the cam is somewhat healthy so i've been told


When i went open header i also put on 16" extensions
But i just used 3-1/2" for the extensions as thats the collector size.

Re: M1 vs. RPM [Re: Von] #2440356
01/25/18 02:04 AM
01/25/18 02:04 AM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,157
Bend,OR USA
C
Cab_Burge Offline
I Win
Cab_Burge  Offline
I Win
C

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,157
Bend,OR USA
Originally Posted By Von
Originally Posted By Cab_Burge
Do you think the 150 CFM bigger carb. didn't help? work
I haven't seen or heard of any BB Mopar, B or RB , that didn't go quicker and faster with a bigger carb work


I'd say some. But considering the actual flow difference between a 850 and 1000, is not near 150 cfm, ,I'll say not that much.

You need to remember that not all carbs. of the same CFM size built by a different company flow the same, some flow more and some flow less as another company same size rated CFM shruggy
The true test is either on the same bench the same day tested by the same tech or tested back to back to back to the original carb. at the track within 1.5 hours of each other at the track tracking the weather changes and adjusting for that twocents
I had three carbs flow tested by the same tech on the same bench within 30 minutes of each other, one barrel at a time and the B.G. Stage # 3 modified Holley 750 CFM flowed 1020 CFM shock The stock Holley 950 HP #80496 flowed 880 CFM and the stock Holley 4781-2 850 CFM D.P. flowed 880 CFM also work shruggy
The B.G. was the fastest of the three at the track up


Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
Re: M1 vs. RPM [Re: Von] #2440376
01/25/18 02:34 AM
01/25/18 02:34 AM
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,319
Puyallup, WA
S
StealthWedge67 Offline
master
StealthWedge67  Offline
master
S

Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,319
Puyallup, WA
Originally Posted By Von
Originally Posted By Cab_Burge
Do you think the 150 CFM bigger carb. didn't help? work
I haven't seen or heard of any BB Mopar, B or RB , that didn't go quicker and faster with a bigger carb work


I'd say some. But considering the actual flow difference between a 850 and 1000, is not near 150 cfm, ,I'll say not that much.


IMO You’re kidding yourself. These two manifolds are very very close by all accounts including Dyno tests. Going from a standard 850dp to a quickfuel 1000 is light years. I’d guess the difference in that swap is 90% carb. In fact, In a heavy wagon, I wouldn’t be surprised if you’re still leaving performance on the table with the single plane.

Last edited by StealthWedge67; 01/25/18 02:36 AM.

LemonWedge - Street heavy / Strip ready - 11.07 @ 120
Re: M1 vs. RPM [Re: OhioMopar] #2440382
01/25/18 03:08 AM
01/25/18 03:08 AM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,698
NE Oklahoma
V
Von Offline
master
Von  Offline
master
V

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,698
NE Oklahoma
Lightyears?

I don't see lightyears. Just my .02...

On my junk...i saw exactly .07 difference between a 40 year old 800dp and a high dollar carb 950 carb. Just my experience.

Yes. I know...every combo is different...

If we're talking 4150 to 4500, then I would agree, no doubt.



Last edited by Von; 01/25/18 03:10 AM.

72 RR, Pump gas 440, 452s, 3800 lbs, Corked, ET Radials,. 11.33@117.72. Same car, bone stock 346s, 9.5 comp, baby solid. 12.24@110.
Re: M1 vs. RPM [Re: Von] #2440396
01/25/18 03:27 AM
01/25/18 03:27 AM
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,319
Puyallup, WA
S
StealthWedge67 Offline
master
StealthWedge67  Offline
master
S

Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,319
Puyallup, WA
Originally Posted By Von
Lightyears?

I don't see lightyears. Just my .02...

On my junk...i saw exactly .07 difference between a 40 year old 800dp and a high dollar carb 950 carb. Just my experience.

Yes. I know...every combo is different...

If we're talking 4150 to 4500, then I would agree, no doubt.



Fair enough. Do you still have the RPM? Just like I mentioned to Ohio, I’d love to see a back to back test with no other changes with these two manifolds.


LemonWedge - Street heavy / Strip ready - 11.07 @ 120
Re: M1 vs. RPM [Re: SILVER67] #2440407
01/25/18 04:05 AM
01/25/18 04:05 AM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,698
NE Oklahoma
V
Von Offline
master
Von  Offline
master
V

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,698
NE Oklahoma
Originally Posted By SILVER67
Originally Posted By Von
Silver,

Exhaust is costing you a solid tenth, (maybe .15) , it looks like?


Yea, the coronet did seem to like the open exhaust.
The exhaust system is full 3" to the bumper with Flowmaster's
I guess the cam is somewhat healthy so i've been told


When i went open header i also put on 16" extensions
But i just used 3-1/2" for the extensions as thats the collector size.


Sorry to hijack one more time, but...Silver was is the LSA of your cam?


72 RR, Pump gas 440, 452s, 3800 lbs, Corked, ET Radials,. 11.33@117.72. Same car, bone stock 346s, 9.5 comp, baby solid. 12.24@110.
Re: M1 vs. RPM [Re: OhioMopar] #2440416
01/25/18 05:19 AM
01/25/18 05:19 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421
Balt. Md
3
383man Offline
Too Many Posts
383man  Offline
Too Many Posts
3

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421
Balt. Md
I can say we had a pretty good comparison on my sons Dart between the RPM and the Holley street Dominator. But his eng is only a .030 over 400 (406 cubes). But you could really see the RPM was much better in the 1/8 and 60 ft. I know in the 1/4 he ran at that time 11.59 @ 117 with the SD and 11.55 @ 116 with the RPM. The single plane SD had more mph in the 1/4 but the RPM still had the better et. And you could see in the timeslip how the RPM won all over in the 1/8 and how the SD was coming on in the 1/4 but ran out of realestate. So if had a bigger eng like a 499 or something then the SD may have won in the 1/4 with an eng with more cubes and torque. Course much depends on the combo as we all know. I run the Indy dual plane on my 493 and it looks to have larger ports then the RPM. I do want to try a single plane one day but a friend I know with a combo very close to mine ran 10.98 with the Indy Dual plane and then he switched to a single plane (Victor I think) and ran a 10.90. So he picked up almost a tenth. But then he took his 850 DP off and went to a Dominator and then ran 10.60's as it really liked the more carb.
So to me it all depends on the combo as the dual plane is better down low and may be faster in the 1/4 on some combo's until you have enough eng , gear and converter so the single plane will be the best and fastest. Ron

Last edited by 383man; 01/25/18 05:20 AM.
Re: M1 vs. RPM [Re: Von] #2440435
01/25/18 08:45 AM
01/25/18 08:45 AM
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 784
Liverpool, NY
S
SILVER67 Offline
super stock
SILVER67  Offline
super stock
S

Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 784
Liverpool, NY


Sorry to hijack one more time, but...Silver was is the LSA of your cam? [/quote]


No worries bud,
.585/.600 1.5 rocker
260@50-268@60
109 lsa
104-105 installed

Re: M1 vs. RPM [Re: OhioMopar] #2440436
01/25/18 08:50 AM
01/25/18 08:50 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 17,918
Akron, Ohio
ProSport Offline
I Live Here
ProSport  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 17,918
Akron, Ohio
I would definitely run the M1 single plane on that motor.


1970 Challenger, all aluminum 528 Hemi, HDK suspension, Tremec 5 speed manual
Re: M1 vs. RPM [Re: OhioMopar] #2440500
01/25/18 12:42 PM
01/25/18 12:42 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 17,918
Akron, Ohio
ProSport Offline
I Live Here
ProSport  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 17,918
Akron, Ohio
Love the SuperBee by the way!

Last edited by ProSport; 01/26/18 10:25 PM.

1970 Challenger, all aluminum 528 Hemi, HDK suspension, Tremec 5 speed manual
Re: M1 vs. RPM [Re: OhioMopar] #2440528
01/25/18 01:32 PM
01/25/18 01:32 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,094
central texas
K
krautrock Offline
top fuel
krautrock  Offline
top fuel
K

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,094
central texas
run the M1 and a good annular booster carb, best of both worlds???

Re: M1 vs. RPM [Re: ProSport] #2440532
01/25/18 01:40 PM
01/25/18 01:40 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,362
Marion, South Carolina [><]
an8sec70cuda Offline
I Live Here
an8sec70cuda  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,362
Marion, South Carolina [><]
500+ inch motor = single plane intake. twocents

My only on track comparison that might be somewhat relevant here was on a mid 11 sec stock stroke 440 combo in a 3700 lb cuda. I tested the RPM vs. a Holley SD and the timeslips were almost identical.


CHIP
'70 hemicuda, 575" Hemi, 727, Dana 60
'69 road runner, 440-6, 18 spline 4 speed, Dana 60
'71 Demon, 340, low gear 904, 8.75
'73 Chrysler New Yorker, 440, 727, 8.75
'90 Chevy 454SS Silverado, 476" BBC, TH400, 14 bolt
'06 GMC 2500HD LBZ Duramax
Re: M1 vs. RPM [Re: Von] #2441277
01/26/18 11:51 PM
01/26/18 11:51 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,779
Mt.Gilead, Ohio
OhioMopar Offline OP
master
OhioMopar  Offline OP
master

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,779
Mt.Gilead, Ohio
Originally Posted By Von
Really don't see why a RPM would even be mentioned on a 512?

Merely because Cab and I talked about it the other night and I respect his opinion and experience a great deal. Just getting some opposing views on it. I feel that the M1 is the best fit for my car, but I would like to put them both on and do some street duty with both and possibly find time to do a same day shootout with both intakes.


1969 Dart GTS 340
1969 Super Bee X9 N-96
1969 Coronet R/T X9 N-96
2015 Dodge Dart GT
2019 Ram 2500 Big Horn.
Looking for the original block for my Bee. The last 4 are 7449
Re: M1 vs. RPM [Re: OhioMopar] #2441295
01/27/18 12:27 AM
01/27/18 12:27 AM
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,857
Pattison Texas
CSK Offline
master
CSK  Offline
master

Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,857
Pattison Texas
on the street my 512, max wedge ,Indy 400-2 ran great, 3.54 gear.


1968 Charger COLD A/C Hilborn EFI
512ci 9.7 compression, Stealth heads, 4.10 gear A518 ODtrans 4100lb,10.93 full street car trim
2020 T/A 392 Stock 11.79 @ 114.5

Page 2 of 2 1 2






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1