Re: E-body trunk torsion springs
[Re: cudaized]
#237282
09/09/09 03:45 PM
09/09/09 03:45 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,133 Chicago Blackhawks
hemicar1971
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,133
Chicago Blackhawks
|
Nice car Ola, thanks for the CD.
My 1971 Challenger Convt. early built car with a luggage rack uses one bar. My 1971 Challenger Hardtop Begining of June built car that came with a wing uses one Bar. At Carlisle a friend that has a 1971 Challenger that was built about 8000 cars behind mine told me he has the two bar system. I do not know the reasoning of why but Chrysler did start to change over to 1972 model parts around this time. My June built Challenger has many 1972 type parts. Slotted bumpers, 1972 trunk floor pan, etc. If this thread sticks around I will look at both my Nov. built 1971 Cudas and see what is in there trunks for a trunk bars.
1971 HEMI E BODY REGISTRY
|
|
|
Re: E-body trunk torsion springs
[Re: cudastruction]
#237284
09/10/09 06:04 PM
09/10/09 06:04 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 89 oregon
ramcharger1964
member
|
member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 89
oregon
|
Is there a tool for removing these bars from the holes? I had a @#$% of a time on my 64 Polara - I ended up cutting them out and then re-welding them back in (the mounting plates not the bars)!!!
Hell B!tch Racing Co.
|
|
|
Re: E-body trunk torsion springs
[Re: ramcharger1964]
#237285
09/10/09 08:28 PM
09/10/09 08:28 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,802 Ontario, Canada
mccannix
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,802
Ontario, Canada
|
Also of note is the fact that Challenger torsion bars will not interchange with Cuda. They are 44 inches long on the straight measurement. Cuda are 39 inches. This is a 71 Challenger decklid, May SPD car, no wing or rack, has one rod and it is heavier than a Cuda rod. Rod is in the third slot in, possibly because a Challenger lid is heavier than Cuda Also Challenger htp mounting brackets are different than Cuda htp.
|
|
|
Re: E-body trunk torsion springs
[Re: B5TA]
#237291
09/11/09 10:41 AM
09/11/09 10:41 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 883 Ohio
B5TA
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 883
Ohio
|
|
|
|
Re: E-body trunk torsion springs
[Re: burdar]
#237293
09/12/09 07:10 AM
09/12/09 07:10 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 287 Greenville, N.C.
BarrsRestoration
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 287
Greenville, N.C.
|
Quote:
Not only is that a 71 and it has two springs but...the orange body plugs for shock access, aren't on the top of the trunk pan. I thought 70-71 had the plug on top and 72-74 had it on the side. Maybe that's just on the Challengers?
That car started life as a 70 (2 springs!), owner wanted a 71. Trunk pan was aftermarket and pre-drilled for shock bolt holes.
|
|
|
Re: Mopar trunk torsion springs - Torque adjustment?
[Re: 70440+6bbl]
#237297
02/06/10 08:27 PM
02/06/10 08:27 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 292 State of Flux
Dodge Don
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 292
State of Flux
|
So for adjusting the decklid tosion bars, which holes create more torque, the ones furthest to rear or the ones furthest toward the front?
Last edited by Dodge Don; 02/06/10 08:33 PM.
|
|
|
|
|