Re: fried harness wires. Why?
[Re: eightlitermopar]
#2365728
09/05/17 12:17 PM
09/05/17 12:17 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 20,235 north of coder
moparx
"Butt Crack Bob"
|
"Butt Crack Bob"
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 20,235
north of coder
|
Ok, ran out of daylight but here are some photos that may be able to help us out. First picture is the battery compartment in the trunk. i am NOT a fan of those battery terminals that just sandwich the cable between a strap and the terminal. they promote corrosion to wick into the cable, plus only provide connection [properly] to the top and bottom of the cable. you need to source a crimp style, solder style, or a furl style set of terminal ends, then protect the connection with a good quality heat shrink, preferably the marine grade with the built in "sealant". plus, in doing so, it will look more professional. just my opinion, but nothing bothers me more than seeing those cheap battery terminals on an otherwise super nice engine bay. i have cured many an electrical gremlin by replacing that kind of terminal in my 50+ years of playing with cars.
|
|
|
Re: fried harness wires. Why?
[Re: eightlitermopar]
#2365747
09/05/17 01:02 PM
09/05/17 01:02 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889 up yours
Supercuda
About to go away
|
About to go away
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889
up yours
|
You problem is not oxidation or corrosion.
That would cause a localized overheating problem.
It's a short.
Find the short.
They say there are no such thing as a stupid question. They say there is always the exception that proves the rule. Don't be the exception.
|
|
|
Re: fried harness wires. Why?
[Re: Mattax]
#2365750
09/05/17 01:06 PM
09/05/17 01:06 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,645 Phila. Pa.
Mattax
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,645
Phila. Pa.
|
Regarding a new bulkhead, do I just pull out the old terminals and push them into the new one? I guess I can destroy the old one to get them if they are melted in there. The big bulkhead connector has the female terminals. They are released with a small flat tool. I've used cotter pins, small screw drivers and finally bought the correct tool. Again borrowed from the Civilian Jeep forum.. This shows the locking tab that must be released. This shows the tool in action: I have the multi-tool shown in that picture. Disadvantage over a single prong tool is that the extra prongs sometimes get in the way. My '67 bulkhead is a little different but similar enough I think the double prong gets in the way with the bulkead. These came from Basic Wiring 101 page 1. If you go there and have a slow connection, just know that site has lots of ads etc. No-script is one way to minimize the extra graphic downloads. CJ wiring is a little different than SJs and our mopars so you can skip the CJ specific stuff. He mentions Packard 59 connectors for the bulkheads. I don't know if that applies to any of our mopars, but if you see slightly larger terminals, then that's what they are. Nacho suggested an alternative to butt connector splice is crimping two wires onto the ammeters ring terminal. This avoids extra connections. Done properly, it will look like this. At least on my '67 Barracuda, that's how Chrysler joined the voltage regulator wire to the Ignition Run wire at the ballast resistor. To do this will require an ring terminal (for the ammeter) with large enough wire capacity. If you have trouble doing this well, then butt connector is better. Basically, use whatever method you can accomplish that provides good a connection. Every connection is location for problems, so generally the strategy is to minimize connections. But one bad connection is worse than two good ones.
Last edited by Mattax; 09/05/17 01:34 PM.
|
|
|
Re: fried harness wires. Why?
[Re: Supercuda]
#2365759
09/05/17 01:18 PM
09/05/17 01:18 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,645 Phila. Pa.
Mattax
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,645
Phila. Pa.
|
... It's a short.
Find the short. Yes. That is the source of the problem. I should have made those ? bigger. Whether its chafed insulation on a wire or internal to something, somewhere was a path to ground. Electricity is always seeking to find a way to lower voltage. With respect to the alternator output that Nacho mentioned. This may or may not be a longer term issue depending on how you use the car. The ammeter will show whether the alternator is providing sufficient power at idle. If you drive a lot in situations where the car is idling at lights on, or with AC, or heater fan runnng, that's when the situation he was describing most commonly happens.
Last edited by Mattax; 09/05/17 01:28 PM.
|
|
|
Re: fried harness wires. Why?
[Re: Mattax]
#2365760
09/05/17 01:20 PM
09/05/17 01:20 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,041 Lincoln Nebraska
RapidRobert
Circle Track
|
Circle Track
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,041
Lincoln Nebraska
|
X3, we need to find the smoking gun here.
live every 24 hour block of time like it's your last day on earth
|
|
|
Re: fried harness wires. Why?
[Re: eightlitermopar]
#2365770
09/05/17 01:42 PM
09/05/17 01:42 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,108 Valencia, España
NachoRT74
master
|
master
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,108
Valencia, España
|
My picture is an updated one, that is a new fuseable link. The picture is how it the old one looked. The insulation was cooked off.
amazed how it took so long to burnt giving time to burn the ammeter wires I was thinking, I may replace the bulkhead because it is over 40 years old and pretty brittle and abused. Regarding a new bulkhead, do I just pull out the old terminals and push them into the new one? I guess I can destroy the old one to get them if they are melted in there.
yes that's my advice, using or not the original ammeter paths through the bulkhead Mattax already explained how to remove the terminals, but destroy the old bulkhead is an option too LOL... maybe faster and won't be dealing with the tabs, being still on original angle to get them inserted on the new one. Terminals can be cleaned from grease and then soak them on a vinegar and salt solution for couple of hours. Then clean and soak in again on baking soda to eliminate the acids of the vinegar. This will clean the sulfating areas and rust As explained before, you can reuse your old engine and forward lighting harnesses plugs if you won't be reinstalling the original ammeter paths running through the bulkhead. If you will reinstall the original paths, will need the engine harness plug and mostly sure the forward lighting one too.
Last edited by NachoRT74; 09/05/17 01:53 PM.
With a Charger born in Chrysler assembly plant in Valencia, Venezuela
|
|
|
Re: fried harness wires. Why?
[Re: Mattax]
#2365771
09/05/17 01:45 PM
09/05/17 01:45 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,108 Valencia, España
NachoRT74
master
|
master
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,108
Valencia, España
|
... It's a short.
Find the short. Yes. That is the source of the problem. I should have made those ? bigger. Whether its chafed insulation on a wire or internal to something, somewhere was a path to ground. Electricity is always seeking to find a way to lower voltage. With respect to the alternator output that Nacho mentioned. This may or may not be a longer term issue depending on how you use the car. The ammeter will show whether the alternator is providing sufficient power at idle. If you drive a lot in situations where the car is idling at lights on, or with AC, or heater fan runnng, that's when the situation he was describing most commonly happens. agreed... find the short, but can be found after the wiring fixing just not hooking the batt after the fix, but making an ohm testing to ground on these wiring net aaand, well, I'm looking forward on the alt upgrade as Mattax mentioned to be safe on regular use with the equipment on car Mattax made the draw splicing the alt wire out of the bulkhead straight to the splice section, then an extra splice from there up to amm. If running the wire out of bulkhead ( not making a stock disposition ) I'd just make one splice between main splice and amm, and run the alt wire straight to the amm. This will save the batt recharge load from run through three splices on its run, will go straight through the ammeter... but, that's me. ( although the main one original wasn't a splice but actually a one piece run with peleed of cover and spliced the rest on it ) you can also disassembly the main splice and run the straight wire, peel off the wire without cut and attach the headlights ( black traced ), fuse box and ign switch ( Red ones ) from the existant splice into a brand new splice like factory did
Last edited by NachoRT74; 09/05/17 02:00 PM.
With a Charger born in Chrysler assembly plant in Valencia, Venezuela
|
|
|
Re: fried harness wires. Why?
[Re: NachoRT74]
#2365848
09/05/17 03:40 PM
09/05/17 03:40 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,630 North Central Florida
eightlitermopar
OP
top fuel
|
OP
top fuel
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,630
North Central Florida
|
Ok, I have most of the dash wires buttoned up and fixed. The ammeter wires are attached but obviously not to the bulkhead connector.
Could a short on the engine side of the harness cause this kind of short? If so, wouldn't the black wire to the alternator be cooked as well? Are we guessing the short is on the engine side?
I am trying to figure out what my next step would be. As far as tracing wires for a short. I will use my test light, hook up the battery ground and my light to positive and start tracing from my "battery stud" under the hood back.
Last edited by eightlitermopar; 09/05/17 04:11 PM.
Mopar or no car
|
|
|
Re: fried harness wires. Why?
[Re: eightlitermopar]
#2365876
09/05/17 04:20 PM
09/05/17 04:20 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889 up yours
Supercuda
About to go away
|
About to go away
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889
up yours
|
Could a short on the engine side of the harness cause this kind of short? If so, wouldn't the black wire to the alternator be cooked as well? Are we guessing the short is on the engine side?
Looks to me in your pictures that the black wire is melted too, it may not be melted all the way back to the alternator, but that wire is not hooked only to the alternator It feeds the fusebox as well. In order for it to melt the current had to flow thru it, so yeah, your problem is somewhere on the engine side of the ammeter, assuming stock wiring setup.
They say there are no such thing as a stupid question. They say there is always the exception that proves the rule. Don't be the exception.
|
|
|
Re: fried harness wires. Why?
[Re: eightlitermopar]
#2365880
09/05/17 04:29 PM
09/05/17 04:29 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,423 Weatherford, Texas
RapidusMaximus
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,423
Weatherford, Texas
|
There are people waaay smarter than me responding to this post, if I'm wrong maybe someone will correct me... but a method I have used to chase shorts is to disconnect the positive battery terminal and hook the test light clamp to the cable then touch the positive post with the test light probe (with the key off, doors shut, trunk shut, in other words, anything that would draw power has to be de-energized) if the test light illuminates you still have a short somewhere, for fused shorts I remove fuses one at a time until the test light no longer illuminates, thus at least isolating the system with the short, in your case I would leave the positive cable disconnected and hook up the wires in the engine compartment, hook the test light clamp to the positive cable then touch the positive post of the battery with the test light probe if it illuminates you still have a short, then one at a time disconnect the wires you just connected in the engine compartment until the test light goes out. Hope this helps.
1968 Plymouth GTX 1974 Dodge P/U Long Bed Stepside 318 2019 Ram 2500 6.4, auto, 4WD
|
|
|
Re: fried harness wires. Why?
[Re: Supercuda]
#2365898
09/05/17 04:51 PM
09/05/17 04:51 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,630 North Central Florida
eightlitermopar
OP
top fuel
|
OP
top fuel
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,630
North Central Florida
|
Ok, I am making little progress. thanks for your patience everyone, seriously I appreciate it.
So this is where I am. My battery is in the trunk, and I didn't want to drag wires to the front of the car, so I got a lawnmower battery and placed up front on the radiator support. I hooked jumper cable (negative) and clamped the other end of the cable (negative) to a bolt holding the radiator.
Mopar or no car
|
|
|
Re: fried harness wires. Why?
[Re: eightlitermopar]
#2365902
09/05/17 04:53 PM
09/05/17 04:53 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,630 North Central Florida
eightlitermopar
OP
top fuel
|
OP
top fuel
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,630
North Central Florida
|
positive side got the test light, but now.....naturally anywhere I touch on the engine block or frame.....the light turns on.
At first I got excited because it lit up with the starter wire from the relay.....until I realized it was just completing the circuit through the engine block, starter wire, back to the starter relay.
The key is to just trace and check the WIRES and see if they light up, correct?
Last edited by eightlitermopar; 09/05/17 04:58 PM.
Mopar or no car
|
|
|
Re: fried harness wires. Why?
[Re: eightlitermopar]
#2365907
09/05/17 05:14 PM
09/05/17 05:14 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,423 Weatherford, Texas
RapidusMaximus
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,423
Weatherford, Texas
|
If I'm thinking right...with the positive cable disconnected from the battery the test light should be between the positive cable and the positive post, everything should be de-energized...the light should not come on, if it does disconnect one wire at a time until it goes out, when the light goes out that would indicate your power drain/shorted circuit.
1968 Plymouth GTX 1974 Dodge P/U Long Bed Stepside 318 2019 Ram 2500 6.4, auto, 4WD
|
|
|
Re: fried harness wires. Why?
[Re: RapidusMaximus]
#2365910
09/05/17 05:19 PM
09/05/17 05:19 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,630 North Central Florida
eightlitermopar
OP
top fuel
|
OP
top fuel
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,630
North Central Florida
|
If I'm thinking right...with the positive cable disconnected from the battery the test light should be between the positive cable and the positive post, everything should be de-energized...the light should not come on, if it does disconnect one wire at a time until it goes out, when the light goes out that would indicate your power drain/shorted circuit. Are you talking about disconnecting one wire at a time along the wire harness? Here is where I am. The engine side harness is not connected to the firewall bulkhead at all, yet I am getting light when probing the ballast resistor, the horns and the alternator wire. I disconnected them from the actual devices to so the power is through the wires. I also probed the bulkhead for kicks and giggles and have SEVERAL that light up. EDIT and UPDATE: Started checking wires from the furthest away from the firewall and started probing. Horn wires lit up, alternator wires lit up, etc. Long story short. One little wire from my tachometer had burned through and was exposed against the intake manifold. this is connected to the coil which was lighting up. Short story: Tachometer is now gone. I have been meaning to do that for a while anyway. However, a wire to the distributor still lights up. See picture. The female end that connects to the ignition control box on the firewall.
Last edited by eightlitermopar; 09/05/17 06:51 PM.
Mopar or no car
|
|
|
Re: fried harness wires. Why?
[Re: eightlitermopar]
#2365953
09/05/17 06:56 PM
09/05/17 06:56 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,630 North Central Florida
eightlitermopar
OP
top fuel
|
OP
top fuel
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,630
North Central Florida
|
Ignition control module removed and visually inspected. Looks good initially, back is not melted or bubbled like it got hot. I have had several of these fail over the years.
Mopar or no car
|
|
|
Re: fried harness wires. Why?
[Re: eightlitermopar]
#2365966
09/05/17 07:27 PM
09/05/17 07:27 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,630 North Central Florida
eightlitermopar
OP
top fuel
|
OP
top fuel
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,630
North Central Florida
|
Here is my voltage regulator test. I think it is shot, reading only 0.55 ohms. I think normal is 1.75 ish? The other picture is the back side which appears it got a little hot and bubbly?
Could this be part of the smoking gun?
Mopar or no car
|
|
|
Re: fried harness wires. Why?
[Re: eightlitermopar]
#2365986
09/05/17 07:54 PM
09/05/17 07:54 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,645 Phila. Pa.
Mattax
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,645
Phila. Pa.
|
The key is to just trace and check the WIRES and see if they light up, correct? It sounds like you are checking for wire continuity. Really what you want to look for is short to ground. I did explain that (or tried) on the previous page https://board.moparts.org/ubbthreads/ubbt...tml#Post2365540 but that assumed a self powered light. So one lead on the Battery Plus, Other lead on the Alternator Bat terminal.* I beleive that's about all that can be tested until repairs are made. As far as the various wires go, even when everything is perfect some will show continuity and some won't. It depends on whether they are switched or not. Download the shop manual and if its easier, start with Nacho's or my '67 diagram. Draw in or erase whatever is different. Since you have some modified stuff there, such as the Chrysler electronic ignition, you can draw that in too. If its too messy or confusing, drawing the ignition circuit seperate from the charging circuit. That's why my posted '67 diagram shows points. I have a seperate diagram for the ignition circuit with the modifications I made for the MSD 6T. This will help both trouble shoot and making repairs. After all, why is that terminal holder empty (20). What is the blue wire with trace? What is the heavy pink wire with trace? For chasing questions about whether something should light up, the diagram will show what circuits are from the main junction, and which ones are only on when ignition switch is in start, run, or accessory. Most will have fuses. A few won't but have circuit breakers. *edit: Gosh since you have a multimeter, just use that. There should be infinite resistance between alternator output (Bat) and ground.
Last edited by Mattax; 09/05/17 08:02 PM.
|
|
|
|
|