Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 6 of 10 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp [Re: 62maxwgn] #2308039
05/20/17 05:19 PM
05/20/17 05:19 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,248
fredericksburg,va
C
cudaman1969 Offline
master
cudaman1969  Offline
master
C

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,248
fredericksburg,va
Originally Posted By 62maxwgn
Originally Posted By NachoRT74
Originally Posted By cudaman1969
On the air cleaner, air comes in from the bottom edge, the cover is a larger diameter than the base.


Gotcha, just detailing some dissasembled cleaners at nicksgarage website and can note now you mention the base is just about the filter element diameter due the recession shape I seeing, and the top supports over the element not over the base, then get an extra room after the support area for it.



Originally Posted By cudaman1969
No cast cranks till the 400.


Pretty sure on 70 and 71 383 2 bbls got cast


Non HP in 71 but forged in 70.

Humm. I do have a 71 fury in the back with the 383-2 bbl. I'll that check out. Factory service manuals are pretty thorough.

Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp [Re: NachoRT74] #2308041
05/20/17 05:21 PM
05/20/17 05:21 PM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095
Valencia, España
NachoRT74 Offline OP
master
NachoRT74  Offline OP
master

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095
Valencia, España
Per damper table here, it seems also 70s

http://www.440source.com/dampers.htm


With a Charger born in Chrysler assembly plant in Valencia, Venezuela
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp [Re: NachoRT74] #2308087
05/20/17 06:44 PM
05/20/17 06:44 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,691
MO
C
cdp Offline
master
cdp  Offline
master
C

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,691
MO
"383 4 bbl 330
Standard camshaft standard valve springs, windage tray ( still debating ), high compression pistons, dual snorkel air cleaner, HP exhaust manifolds ( seems to be a standard agreement but still some doubts ), forged crank. No Magnum/supercommando denomination so, no HP stamp? Turquoise paint, I guess double timing chain ?"

I have a 69 Charger, H-code, 330 horse 383. Was 95% original when I got it. Engine is turquoise, not stamped as an HP motor. Factory HP manifolds, small round 340/383/440 HP air cleaner (no snorkels) with red 383 4-barrel pie tin . Standard 4v intake, and of course the car has A/C. I think the 69 manual states a specific carb...compared to HP stamped 383's (like 6 numbers listed). Did not have a double roller chain.

When I pulled the heads, they had red valve springs, and factory details that it had a standard 2v camshaft.

Essentially, it seems its a 2v- base motor with nothing more than a 4v intake, and HP exhaust manifolds. And all should have had AC.

Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp [Re: cdp] #2308105
05/20/17 07:30 PM
05/20/17 07:30 PM
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,856
Pattison Texas
CSK Offline
master
CSK  Offline
master

Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,856
Pattison Texas
Originally Posted By cdp
"383 4 bbl 330
Standard camshaft standard valve springs, windage tray ( still debating ), high compression pistons, dual snorkel air cleaner, HP exhaust manifolds ( seems to be a standard agreement but still some doubts ), forged crank. No Magnum/supercommando denomination so, no HP stamp? Turquoise paint, I guess double timing chain ?"

I have a 69 Charger, H-code, 330 horse 383. Was 95% original when I got it. Engine is turquoise, not stamped as an HP motor. Factory HP manifolds, small round 340/383/440 HP air cleaner (no snorkels) with red 383 4-barrel pie tin . Standard 4v intake, and of course the car has A/C. I think the 69 manual states a specific carb...compared to HP stamped 383's (like 6 numbers listed). Did not have a double roller chain.

When I pulled the heads, they had red valve springs, and factory details that it had a standard 2v camshaft.

Essentially, it seems its a 2v- base motor with nothing more than a 4v intake, and HP exhaust manifolds. And all should have had AC.


And flat top pistons instead of dished.


1968 Charger COLD A/C Hilborn EFI
512ci 9.7 compression, Stealth heads, 4.10 gear A518 ODtrans 4100lb,10.93 full street car trim
2020 T/A 392 Stock 11.79 @ 114.5

Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp [Re: 62maxwgn] #2308106
05/20/17 07:40 PM
05/20/17 07:40 PM
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 259
Khemi, Stygia
Mebsuta Offline
enthusiast
Mebsuta  Offline
enthusiast

Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 259
Khemi, Stygia
Originally Posted By 62maxwgn
Boy,all this for 5 hp,glad it isn't 50 hp !! rolleyes


ikr. All to go as fast as a Nissan Altima. lol.


68 Roadrunner. 383 4-spd. Beat up.
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp [Re: NachoRT74] #2308111
05/20/17 07:45 PM
05/20/17 07:45 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,691
MO
C
cdp Offline
master
cdp  Offline
master
C

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,691
MO
"And flat top pistons instead of dished."

Yes, mine is in the garage with original pistons. Did a basic rebuild/re-ring. Tall flat tops.

Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp [Re: NachoRT74] #2308127
05/20/17 08:01 PM
05/20/17 08:01 PM
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 784
Florida
cbusters Offline
super stock
cbusters  Offline
super stock

Joined: May 2005
Posts: 784
Florida
I scanned through the posts in the thread and didn't notice anyone mentioning the fact that the 69 335hp 383 motor had positive deck height flat top pistons originally. It wasn't much but it kept anyone from just doing a quick bolt on of the 67 440 closed chamber heads to increase compression. You had to make sure your head gasket was thick enough to keep the piston from hitting the combustion chamber. When rebuilding the engines in the 70's, the catalog had a listing for both pistons, neutral and positive height. Consider this as a possibility as to why the horsepower rating was different. Eventually the taller pistons were just dropped from the books and like now only one is shown.

I recall this was one of the tips mentioned in the big yellow Direction Connection Racing Manual.

Perhaps Plymouth converted to the open chamber heads for emissions or some other Federal Mandate and the piston change was a little cheat to help performance.

Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp [Re: cbusters] #2308131
05/20/17 08:10 PM
05/20/17 08:10 PM
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 259
Khemi, Stygia
Mebsuta Offline
enthusiast
Mebsuta  Offline
enthusiast

Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 259
Khemi, Stygia
Originally Posted By cbusters
I scanned through the posts in the thread and didn't notice anyone mentioning the fact that the 69 335hp 383 motor had positive deck height flat top pistons originally.


If you mention that, somebody will insist that they weren't +dh, so I never say anything.


68 Roadrunner. 383 4-spd. Beat up.
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp [Re: NachoRT74] #2308153
05/20/17 09:04 PM
05/20/17 09:04 PM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095
Valencia, España
NachoRT74 Offline OP
master
NachoRT74  Offline OP
master

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095
Valencia, España
How much over DH got your pistons?

( yes somebody mentioned about that )

Did 2bbl engines get dished instead lower CH pistons? I thought they were simply lower ones.


With a Charger born in Chrysler assembly plant in Valencia, Venezuela
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp [Re: Mebsuta] #2308246
05/21/17 12:08 AM
05/21/17 12:08 AM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,313
Prospect, PA
BSB67 Offline
master
BSB67  Offline
master

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,313
Prospect, PA
Originally Posted By Mebsuta
Originally Posted By cbusters
I scanned through the posts in the thread and didn't notice anyone mentioning the fact that the 69 335hp 383 motor had positive deck height flat top pistons originally.


If you mention that, somebody will insist that they weren't +dh, so I never say anything.


How much + have you measured them?

Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp [Re: BSB67] #2308286
05/21/17 01:14 AM
05/21/17 01:14 AM
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 784
Florida
cbusters Offline
super stock
cbusters  Offline
super stock

Joined: May 2005
Posts: 784
Florida
Originally Posted By BSB67
Originally Posted By Mebsuta
Originally Posted By cbusters
I scanned through the posts in the thread and didn't notice anyone mentioning the fact that the 69 335hp 383 motor had positive deck height flat top pistons originally.


If you mention that, somebody will insist that they weren't +dh, so I never say anything.


How much + have you measured them?


Long ago, far far away. It was less than .100 , if my yellow book surfaces I will check to see if it mentions it.

Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp [Re: Mebsuta] #2308310
05/21/17 02:14 AM
05/21/17 02:14 AM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,205
Someplace you aren't
S
SomeCarGuy Offline
I Live Here
SomeCarGuy  Offline
I Live Here
S

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,205
Someplace you aren't
Originally Posted By Mebsuta
Originally Posted By cbusters
I scanned through the posts in the thread and didn't notice anyone mentioning the fact that the 69 335hp 383 motor had positive deck height flat top pistons originally.


If you mention that, somebody will insist that they weren't +dh, so I never say anything.


Paging johnrr


I want my fair share
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp [Re: cbusters] #2308323
05/21/17 02:50 AM
05/21/17 02:50 AM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,157
Bend,OR USA
C
Cab_Burge Offline
I Win
Cab_Burge  Offline
I Win
C

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,157
Bend,OR USA
Originally Posted By cbusters
I scanned through the posts in the thread and didn't notice anyone mentioning the fact that the 69 335hp 383 motor had positive deck height flat top pistons originally. It wasn't much but it kept anyone from just doing a quick bolt on of the 67 440 closed chamber heads to increase compression. You had to make sure your head gasket was thick enough to keep the piston from hitting the combustion chamber. When rebuilding the engines in the 70's, the catalog had a listing for both pistons, neutral and positive height. Consider this as a possibility as to why the horsepower rating was different. Eventually the taller pistons were just dropped from the books and like now only one is shown.

I recall this was one of the tips mentioned in the big yellow Direction Connection Racing Manual.

Perhaps Plymouth converted to the open chamber heads for emissions or some other Federal Mandate and the piston change was a little cheat to help performance.

Me thinks your source got it wrong on the year of the positive deck height pistons on the 383 Magnum motor, I'll swear it was only the 1970 383 magnum motors that had the Holley carbs also that where listed by Chrysler to NHRA tech. department with + .005 deck height, just like the 390 HP 440 6 pack motors where scope


Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp [Re: cbusters] #2308353
05/21/17 08:09 AM
05/21/17 08:09 AM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,313
Prospect, PA
BSB67 Offline
master
BSB67  Offline
master

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,313
Prospect, PA
Originally Posted By cbusters
Originally Posted By BSB67
Originally Posted By Mebsuta
Originally Posted By cbusters
I scanned through the posts in the thread and didn't notice anyone mentioning the fact that the 69 335hp 383 motor had positive deck height flat top pistons originally.


If you mention that, somebody will insist that they weren't +dh, so I never say anything.


How much + have you measured them?


Long ago, far far away. It was less than .100 , if my yellow book surfaces I will check to see if it mentions it.


I've measured a few unaltered originals, they were all below the deck. The NHRA spec is like 0.020" proud, I have never seen one from the factory like that.

I knew a guy that ran an A body 383 car in Super Stock had to actually grind on the pistons to clear the 906 heads where the head overhung the bore.

The 1.932" CH piston was used in at least 1968 and 69 383, maybe 1970 too.

Last edited by BSB67; 05/21/17 08:13 AM.
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp [Re: Cab_Burge] #2308355
05/21/17 08:21 AM
05/21/17 08:21 AM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,313
Prospect, PA
BSB67 Offline
master
BSB67  Offline
master

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,313
Prospect, PA
Originally Posted By Cab_Burge

Me thinks your source got it wrong on the year of the positive deck height pistons on the 383 Magnum motor, I'll swear it was only the 1970 383 magnum motors that had the Holley carbs also that where listed by Chrysler to NHRA tech. department with + .005 deck height, just like the 390 HP 440 6 pack motors where scope


I think the 440 6 bbl blueprint was -0.001".

Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp [Re: NachoRT74] #2308371
05/21/17 09:51 AM
05/21/17 09:51 AM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 90
sweden
C
carter Offline
member
carter  Offline
member
C

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 90
sweden
I had seven or eight virgin 383 past the years, two was -71 (G) One 2bbl and one was a 4bbl both painted blue. All had forged cranks.

My match# 383 4bbl Non-HP for my -70 E-body ( N-code) Is painted blue, has HP manifold, 402 oil pan without vindage tray, Carter carb # 4736s. (G9)

Last edited by carter; 05/21/17 09:55 AM.
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp [Re: NachoRT74] #2308448
05/21/17 01:03 PM
05/21/17 01:03 PM
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 784
Florida
cbusters Offline
super stock
cbusters  Offline
super stock

Joined: May 2005
Posts: 784
Florida
Here you go, fresh from the DC Racing Manual circa 1979.

Pos Deck.JPG
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp [Re: cbusters] #2308490
05/21/17 01:53 PM
05/21/17 01:53 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,157
Bend,OR USA
C
Cab_Burge Offline
I Win
Cab_Burge  Offline
I Win
C

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,157
Bend,OR USA
Originally Posted By cbusters
Here you go, fresh from the DC Racing Manual circa 1979.

Let me clarify that I didn't doubt that you read that in a Mopar manual, what I should have said that I jhave never seen a production 383, from 1959 to 1971, that had the stock OEM piston tops above the decks shruggy You need to remember that the original beaded steel head gaskest where .022 thick and had a smaller bore size than the later 440/400 bore size .017 thick beaded steel head gaskets work
Which leads me to say do not believe every thing you see in print tsk Have you heard the old adage to not believe any thing you hear and only half of what you see work
Many myths out there. Mopar, Chevy and Ford provided many false specs. to NHRA, NASCAR and other sanctioning racing organizations on many different parts they made for racing only that where not used on production cars shock shruggy

Last edited by Cab_Burge; 05/21/17 02:29 PM.

Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp [Re: cbusters] #2308500
05/21/17 01:59 PM
05/21/17 01:59 PM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095
Valencia, España
NachoRT74 Offline OP
master
NachoRT74  Offline OP
master

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095
Valencia, España
interesting reading from the DC book. I have the book but never advertised that... will search and read


Originally Posted By cbusters
Originally Posted By BSB67
Originally Posted By Mebsuta
Originally Posted By cbusters
I scanned through the posts in the thread and didn't notice anyone mentioning the fact that the 69 335hp 383 motor had positive deck height flat top pistons originally.


If you mention that, somebody will insist that they weren't +dh, so I never say anything.


How much + have you measured them?


Long ago, far far away. It was less than .100 , if my yellow book surfaces I will check to see if it mentions it.


less than .100"??? still being .050 sounds a bit of too much for a factory assembly!!! I have had constanty bad decking jobs on my 400 and I'm worried now will have to cut it again and hoping will be getting around 0.020. on one of the sides. The other side seems to be at zero. Will use the felpro brass shim on that side to get both sides equalized.

well that was a bit off topic.


With a Charger born in Chrysler assembly plant in Valencia, Venezuela
Re: 383 HP 330vs335 hp [Re: NachoRT74] #2308525
05/21/17 02:42 PM
05/21/17 02:42 PM
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,893
michigan
7
70 buzz Offline
top fuel
70 buzz  Offline
top fuel
7

Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,893
michigan
Would all this mean if you have a ramcharger hood you would be looking at around 340 hp suppose it added 5 hp if that is true for a 1970 super bee

Page 6 of 10 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1