1994 5.9 magnum upgrades?
#2182726
10/26/16 01:07 AM
10/26/16 01:07 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,437 Omaha Nebraska
Brian_wo
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,437
Omaha Nebraska
|
So I pulled the engine and trans from a 94 Ram that I originally bought for the overdrive but decided to use both the engine and trans in my 67. Today the new oil pan and pickup showed up and I am thinking I should have got a new oil pump and timing chain while I was at it,seems to me I saw some sort of chain for the sb with a tensioner?
I am going to go headers with an X pipe and 2.25 dual exhaust,can I do any others mods like maybe a little more cam or is it limited by the 94 computer?
I have never been much of a sb guy,am I missing anything in the way of upgrades or mods for nothing more than a good driver?
I am retaining the factory 94 computer and fuel injection.
who is that guy?
|
|
|
Re: 1994 5.9 magnum upgrades?
[Re: Brian_wo]
#2182743
10/26/16 01:44 AM
10/26/16 01:44 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,035 Missouri U.S.A.
71yelladustr
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,035
Missouri U.S.A.
|
I would consider a Hughes regrind cam. However, the SBEC controller is not going to support much altering of engine vacuum (long duration cam) so you mods will limited. Some have said truck V-10 rocker arms offer a small gain in performance as well. You may also consider popping the heads off and opening up the pushrod pinch in the intake ports and cleaning up the bowls for a noticeable improvement in power. The intake manifold could also be replaced a with a M-1 MPI (now obsolete) or a Hughes modded RPM air gap to yield a few ponies.
392 gen III hemi on E-85 727 trans Dana 60 10.02@134
|
|
|
Re: 1994 5.9 magnum upgrades?
[Re: 71yelladustr]
#2182818
10/26/16 08:16 AM
10/26/16 08:16 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,686 Buford, GA
I_bleed_MOPAR
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,686
Buford, GA
|
Was it on here or elsewhere that I read about replacing the stock air cleaner with a ram-air type dual snorkel w/ hoses? I'll see if I can find it. Price was kind of spendy as I remember but was thinking of doing something similar with pull-your-own on my Durango. Tim
'71 Charger 383/727 '17 Challenger SXT (Wifeys car )
|
|
|
Re: 1994 5.9 magnum upgrades?
[Re: 360view]
#2182854
10/26/16 10:33 AM
10/26/16 10:33 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,318 Manitoba, Canada
DaytonaTurbo
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,318
Manitoba, Canada
|
the factory full throttle air fuel ratio from a very rich 10.5 to 1 to about 12.8 to 1.
I have read this before as well, that the factory engineers calibrated the magnums rich enough at full throttle to be able to run without any exhaust system and still not lean out. Anything you can do to help flow is beneficial here. I have a digital copy of the MP porting templates for magnum if that's something you want to pursue you can PM me. I left my conversion basically stock, however everything I have read indicates the stock ECU, which is not able to be reprogrammed by the way, won't tolerate much in the way of mods. I would focus on cleaning up the heads, tightening quench and freeing up the exhaust, although if you don't plan on pulling the heads I'd leave it as-is. I don't think the stock ECU would like the aftermarket M1 efi intake, but I have no practical experience with it. I can tell you the stock intake is known leak oil into the intake tract, hughes sells a kit to remedy this. If you drill out the holes on your crank sensor, you can slot it and move it sideways, this will gain you a bit of ignition timing as playing with the distributor won't do it on the magnum engines.
|
|
|
Re: 1994 5.9 magnum upgrades?
[Re: DaytonaTurbo]
#2182876
10/26/16 11:03 AM
10/26/16 11:03 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 8,162 USA
360view
Moparts resident spammer
|
Moparts resident spammer
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 8,162
USA
|
I think Chrysler did the right thing when they set up the full throttle air to fuel ratio very rich at full throttle. As the graph below from a Porsche engineer shows, pinging can be surpressed with a very rich air fuel ratio This allowed a relatively high compression ratio for day to day part throttle driving. The Magnum 5.9 V8 is listed in the 1994-1995 FSM as 9.1:1 static But later advertised as 8.9:1 In the "real world" it is probably something like 8.7:1 static even counting carbon deposit build up. The MI Congressman John Dingle Jr "passing power emissions loophole" used to allow unlimited HC and NOx above 80% throttle, so 10.5 air to fuel ratio was legal. CO is very low at very rich mixtures anyway. Rep Henry Waxman and Rep Pelosi stripped Dingle of his chairmanship and did away with the passing power "loophole" about the year 2009. I have actually wondered "how high a dynamic compression ratio could a Magnum V8 run on 92 AKI gasoline" The "rich mixture spark miss-fire limit" or what the Germans call the "inflammabilty limit" is around 9 to 1 air fuel ratio, or 0.61 lamhda in the above Gruden graph from Porsche. Maybe if higher flow 30 to 32 lb/hr fuel injectors were fitted ( 1994-1995 Magnum 5.9 V8 #53030262 factory injectors are about 27.5 lb/hr at 3 Bar standard measuring pressure) maybe the compression ratio could be raised 2 numbers without pinging or detonation?
Last edited by 360view; 10/26/16 12:28 PM.
|
|
|
Re: 1994 5.9 magnum upgrades?
[Re: Brian_wo]
#2182898
10/26/16 11:37 AM
10/26/16 11:37 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 679 Los Osos, Ca
CKessel
mopar
|
mopar
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 679
Los Osos, Ca
|
When I had my 94, I put on Crower 1.7 rockers[cheaper and better hp wise than the overpriced MP cam] MP pcm, MP headers, V10 cat[ larger in and out and less dough than V8 unit], MP/Turbo Action shift kit, 1st design F&B throttle body[wow!], Ford Motorsport injectors[recommended by MP tech line because cheaper and have better spray pattern], K&N FIPK, modded TPS[made a huge difference in throttle response], 340 timing set[to take retard out of oe units].
Carl Kessel
|
|
|
Re: 1994 5.9 magnum upgrades?
[Re: Brian_wo]
#2183257
10/26/16 09:20 PM
10/26/16 09:20 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,437 Omaha Nebraska
Brian_wo
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,437
Omaha Nebraska
|
Thinking about replacing the heads after reading a bunch last night,I really don't want to get to crazy with this build as it is "supposed" to be my girlfriends car :-)
Is there a better timing chain for these things?
who is that guy?
|
|
|
Re: 1994 5.9 magnum upgrades?
[Re: Brian_wo]
#2183356
10/26/16 10:48 PM
10/26/16 10:48 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,791 Hamilton, Ontario Canada
Magnum
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,791
Hamilton, Ontario Canada
|
The factory Magnum engine is seriously choked for car duty. Scrap the intake and camshaft. Anything with more than .410" lift will be an improvement.
Get an carbureted intake and throw a Holley fuel injection or FiTech set up and you will have a wild combination.
69 Super Bee, 93 Mustang LX, 04 Allure Super
|
|
|
Re: 1994 5.9 magnum upgrades?
[Re: ahy]
#2183634
10/27/16 10:41 AM
10/27/16 10:41 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,318 Manitoba, Canada
DaytonaTurbo
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,318
Manitoba, Canada
|
Even if you run it "as is" it is the most durable and driveable SB made.
Yep, and if it's his girlfriend's car, best to leave it as-is. It'll start and run great and be dead nuts reliable while having more power than the SB engines back in the day. Bear in mind the 5.2 has 230 net hp as per stock ratings, the 340 had around 240 net hp.
Last edited by DaytonaTurbo; 10/27/16 10:42 AM.
|
|
|
Re: 1994 5.9 magnum upgrades?
[Re: Brian_wo]
#2183664
10/27/16 11:36 AM
10/27/16 11:36 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 679 Los Osos, Ca
CKessel
mopar
|
mopar
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 679
Los Osos, Ca
|
The other issue with the stock heads is that they like to crack. The Engine Quest units from Indy, Hughes or even your local machine shop are way better for the cracking issue and flow better. Flow is even better than the R/T heads that were sold by MP.
Carl Kessel
|
|
|
Re: 1994 5.9 magnum upgrades?
[Re: CKessel]
#2183837
10/27/16 03:51 PM
10/27/16 03:51 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,376
dogdays
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,376
|
The cracking issue has been beat to death. Most of the cracks don't leak. There must be hundreds of thousands of Magnum heads on the streets today with the famous crack. Of course if you have the $$$ the EQ heads are very nice. They can be had either Mag face or LA face. http://www.aamidwest.com/enginequest/cylinder-heads/chrysler-magnum-head/Now is the time for Blazin' Bob to jump in and warn you to get the heads either from EQ or a reputable dealer. There are lower quality Chinese castings out there. Caveat Emptor! R.
|
|
|
Re: 1994 5.9 magnum upgrades?
[Re: Brian_wo]
#2184169
10/27/16 10:23 PM
10/27/16 10:23 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,437 Omaha Nebraska
Brian_wo
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,437
Omaha Nebraska
|
Think I have a plan,now I just have to break the news to her that she needs to pony up for at least half the price of the new heads :-)
who is that guy?
|
|
|
Re: 1994 5.9 magnum upgrades?
[Re: dogdays]
#2186964
10/31/16 08:27 PM
10/31/16 08:27 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,437 Omaha Nebraska
Brian_wo
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,437
Omaha Nebraska
|
Ok,who do we trust? Thinking I will get the heads with the 2.02s
who is that guy?
|
|
|
|
|